It’s not all Sikhs, it’s the Khalistanis.
It’s not all Asians, it’s the Pakistanis.
It’s not all immigrants, it’s the Muslims.
It’s not all black people, it’s the Somalis.
The British Empire mastered this divide and rule tactic during the Raj.
The same mindset still exists in Britain.
They’ve got minority groups pointing fingers at other minorities hoping to win acceptance.
But history shows how this always ends.
One by one, every community gets targeted eventually.
Go speak to your grandparents and learn a thing or two.
Over the past two years, the latest conflict in Sudan is estimated to have claimed at least 150,000 lives.
Now, human rights organisation FairSquare has provided the latest calls for the British government’s Foreign Office to consider sanctions and investigate the role of Sheikh Mansour bin Zayed Al-Nahyan — owner of Manchester City and deputy prime minister of Abu Dhabi — in the UAE government's alleged support of a paramilitary group accused of committing war crimes in the country.
This follows on from former leader of the Conservative Party Iain Duncan Smith stating in parliament in January that Mansour was “possibly the most high-profile UAE investor in the UK economy” and arguing that the Foreign Office should undertake a “full assessment of whether representatives of the UAE Government may meet the criteria for sanctions”.
The UK government has already sanctioned several private individuals and organisations in connection to the atrocities taking place in Sudan, which UN officials have stated carry “hallmarks of genocide”.
The UAE strongly denies being a party to the conflict or supporting either side.
@jwhitey98 explains why there have been calls to investigate potential sanctions against Man City's owner and what the possible consequences would be.
🔗 https://t.co/eObOUNRBjz
Two things are being dangerously conflated here the legitimacy of the Sudanese Armed forces as the military arm of the Sudanese Sovereign Republic (not constitutionally open to dispute) and the legitimacy of members of the Sudanese Army leadership to Govern.
Burhan (the legitimately appointed head of the Sudanese Army) is an unelected Head of State who ousted an unelected Prime Minister (Hamdok) and replaced him with another unelected Prime Minister (Kamil Idris). The fact that Hamdok was favoured by Western Governments does not magically grant him legitimacy, especially given how monumentally unpopular Hamdok is in Sudan. True legitimacy can only be granted by the Sudanese people via free elections. Which given that the Sudanese State is fighting an existential War against a proxy genocidal militia, can’t happen right now even if the Sudanese Army leadership are truly supportive of a democratic transition in the long run.
The sleight of hand by a handful of Western Governments however, is to call for a civilian Government and not a democratically elected Gov. That way they can reject the Sudanese Govs they don’t like and bestow recognition and faux legitimacy on the Gov and PM they do like.
Sudanese in the long run deserve a Government of their own choosing but right now the focus has to be completely on defeating this genocidal Janjaweed militia
This is completely false information.
According to reporting by MEE, several soldiers and officers who had to withdraw from the city because of UAE jamming of communications and turning off the Satellite phones "Thuraya" which made it "impossible to defend the city".
Dear Yousra,
These forces withdrew only after 269 fierce battles defending the historical city and its remaining citizens. Why were you so quick to accept and amplify an easy inaccuracy when the reality of documented testimony, satellite imagery and the scars on the city itself pointed absolutely the other way?
As a Sudanese journalist, you carry more than the obligations of a Western correspondent observing "another African war".
You carry the responsibility of telling a story that protects the truth of a nation under an unprovoked geopolitical assault.
The war in Sudan is not a contest of elites, nor a simple struggle between a "government" and a "rebel force". It is an existential fight over dignity, unity, and sovereignty, it's over the survival of our ancient people and their historical right to remain on their homeland.
You have every right to critique the current leadership and hold those in power accountable, that is part of a continuous democratic struggle. But to reduce this moment to anonymous whispers of "a deal" is to echo the narrative of those seeking to delegitimize the resistance of an entire nation defending itself against occupation and dismemberment.
#BoycottUAE
#الامارات_تقتل_السودانيين
It’s interesting how history is selectively remembered here. The groups that fought the Sudanese Armed Forces in the past, such as SPLA, JEM, and SLA, etc. had clear political agendas and represented real communities with genuine demands rooted in decades of marginalization, or at least what they and their supporters perceived as such. Their causes were openly discussed on regional and global platforms, and they maintained political offices abroad, engaged mediators, and received diplomatic attention as actors in a national conflict.
The Rapid Support Militia (Janjaweed), on the other hand, stands apart. It was never a movement born from political struggle or social exclusion, but from a legacy of violence, plunder, and ethnic targeting. No country today is willing to be associated with it, and even the UAE, its main sponsor, hides its support behind secrecy and deniability, fully aware of the reputational and legal consequences.
If we are to draw from history, then honesty demands recognizing that the Janjaweed is not a continuation of Sudan’s armed politics. It is a distortion of it, sustained only by foreign sponsorship. Once that sponsorship ends, so will the militia.
🇬🇧 Investigation reveals that the fall of el-Fasher was engineered through a UAE-backed electronic warfare campaign
The collapse of el-Fasher was not merely a battlefield loss—it was a calculated tech siege. On 26 October, all communication systems in the besieged city went offline. Radios, Thuraya phones, and even Starlink terminals suddenly stopped working.
Sudanese soldiers were cut off from command, unable to regroup, retreat, or even receive orders. Chaos ensued. Hundreds died unaware they had been abandoned. Commanders fled. RSF forces moved in swiftly, committing atrocities and massacres.
Exclusive testimonies confirm that the blackout was caused by high-grade jamming technology—Chinese-made, but financed, supplied, and trained on by the United Arab Emirates.
Images obtained show RSF fighters using Wolves Team and Norinco multi-band jammers, including backpack-mounted systems capable of disrupting satellite communications. Telecom engineers verified that the outages were targeted, powerful, and unprecedented.
This was not an accident. It was a foreign-funded experiment in digital warfare.
Since April 2023, the UAE has poured advanced tools into the RSF’s hands: drones, logistics, and now electromagnetic dominance. El-Fasher was their battlefield lab—and it worked.
Sudan’s defenders were not just outgunned. They were blinded, silenced, and digitally erased by one of the wealthiest regimes in the region.
This is not just Sudan’s tragedy—it is a blueprint for proxy warfare in the 21st century.
More: https://t.co/Uy99r0BYCv
#Sudan #Darfur #elFasher #RSF #UAE #SudanWar #ProxyWars #DarkBox #MilitaryTech #DigitalWar
Proud of the Mauritanian contestant that withdrawing from the match against the Emirati 🇦🇪 in support of the Sudanese people. What a fantastic show of solidarity to his brethren in Sudan 🇸🇩.