John Doe

Just a man of the people

[Nelson Rodrigues @NelsonRedPill]

A Europa será destruída por mulheres que projetam naqueles animais a maternidade que cabia aos filhos que elas abortaram.

[John Doe @manofthepeopl3]

@AntiCNtheonomy @JoelWebbon That I am not sure of. I was simply making sure people knew where he got the ideas from. I myself and not sure I agree with Traducianism anyway.

[John Doe @manofthepeopl3]

@suzania Traducianism is the minority view, sure, but it isn't heresy lol

[John Doe @manofthepeopl3]

@elimcgowan Traducianism, even if it is incorrect, is not heretical, or even unbelievable.

[John Doe @manofthepeopl3]

@Djkeene1 @DavidAFrench hardest hit

[John Doe @manofthepeopl3]

@jjones9 @TheAthletic In fairness, we are dealing with outcome bias. We know after the fact that the clot became a DVT and went into his lungs, but the more important question is what did they know at the time, and did they act appropriately based on that knowledge?

[John Doe @manofthepeopl3]

@DavidAFrench It is also what happens when the youth are majority non-white

[Dre Baldwin | #WorkOnYourGame @DreAllDay]

The Jalen Hurts situation is a textbook example of Outcome Bias.

A superficial blood clot before the London game.
Doctors cleared him. He played.

Suddenly, everybody knows the Eagles should’ve never let him play.
Based on what…

Original diagnosis was not a guarantee that playing = worsening.

Doctors evaluated the risk. Made a decision.

Had Hurts played, recovered and never had another issue, nobody would care.

But because the outcome is what it is, people are treating the original decision as obviously wrong.

That’s Outcome Bias. It wasn’t wrong.

Bad result ≠ bad decision.

You judge decisions by the information available when they were made.
Not by information you only gained afterward.

Otherwise, every risk that works is smart.
And every risk that fails was stupid.

That’s not judgment. That’s hindsight.

[vittorio @IterIntellectus]

“Your universe has no meaning to them. They will not try to understand. They will be full of energy, they will be warm and fed, they will destroy your beautiful oak door because they hate you”

[John Doe @manofthepeopl3]

@ScooterMagruder Turns out when he was in London he was advised by doctors NOT TO SLEEP, and so he was up for 36 hours straight before the game against the Jaguars.

[John Doe @manofthepeopl3]

@Romans8Shaman @PerfInjust We also didn't actually fight to stop abortion either. We could have ended it 50 years ago, but our leaders didn't have the courage, and we didn't have the courage or discipline to get new leaders. As a whole we were apathetic, and we let 80 million babies die

[John Doe @manofthepeopl3]

@PerfInjust God's judgement has political manifestations. The immediate solutions are political, but will only last if there is repentance because unless the Lord builds the house those who labor labor in vain.

[John Doe @manofthepeopl3]

@JoelWebbon They aren't speaking French either

[fr3tus — 🇺🇸/acc ⏩ @Icalbert101]

The slow blade penetrates the shield

[Eric Conn @Eric_Conn]

Many in the pro-life lobby want job security. Making it illegal and prosecuting those responsible would put them out of a job.

[Eric Conn @Eric_Conn]

This isn’t complicated. The reason it doesn’t happen is because we let the Longhouse rule society and dictate morality.

And a key rule in the Longhouse is that women can never be held responsible for their own wicked behavior.

[Stephen Wolfe @PerfInjust]

The Baptist Faith and Message says, “The state has no right to impose penalties for religious opinions of any kind.”

One might say, "Polygamy and human sacrifice are kinds of religious opinions denied public expression."

But they would respond: "Those are penalized not as religious acts but as public harms."

So, the question is whether the religious act is publicly harmful or injurious to persons.

Atheism, polytheism, demon-worship, statues to Hindu warrior monkey gods, blasphemy, undermining Christian national culture, etc. are publicly harmful.

Therefore, a Baptist may affirm the confession while also calling for the suppression of everything from atheism to the undermining of Christian national culture.

They just can't call for penalties for religious opinions as religious opinions but as they undermine civil goods.

[Matt Walsh @MattWalshBlog]

This kind of sloppiness is inexcusable. Why would you publicly announce something as dramatic as a live-streamed execution if you weren’t absolutely sure you wanted to do it and hadn’t already thought through all of the very predicable and inevitable blowback you would get? This makes it seem like they just kind of off the cuff floated the idea of killing someone on a live stream and then changed their mind when people were upset about it. Totally ridiculous, no matter how you feel about the public execution idea. No excuse to handle it this way. You need to go into something like this very thoughtfully, with seriousness of purpose and a sense of the gravity of the situation. Instead we get a casual announcement of a public execution and then a casual retraction on social media a few days later. Absurd.

[John Doe @manofthepeopl3]

@GMRench Amen!