@Imran8820139 @ExcessiveFarce@ezraklein You should look at his subreddit if you believe this. It would seem the majority of his fanbase disagree with him on this. There are of course sycophants, but I don't think that describes everyone that agrees with Harris.
@seriouspod I respect that. That’s what I appreciated in your first episode. Now that it’s been a couple weeks since the article, I feel the broad consensus is pretty agreeable. The initial reactionary defences of LK seems to have receded.
@NiceMangos These people have such a lack of self-awareness to accuse others of making 'emotional' decisions, as if their right wing perspective is crafted wholly of out logic, devoid of any inferior human qualities. Laughably obvious example of the Fundamental Attribution Error.
@seriouspod@RandyLaMonda@CaraSantaMaria I remember her saying he acted inappropriately during an interview she had with him in the early days of her podcast, but I don’t remember her ever elaborating. It wasn’t self evident in the audio, but that doesn’t mean something didn’t happen before or after the recording.
@BmansourB Foreskin exists to serve a useful purpose. It reduces friction during sex and also protects the glands, the most sensitive part of the penis, from being de-sensitized. By removing the foreskin a person foregoes these benefits.
@kramnivel81 @nickshutup @arteagajorge3 @NegrofuXiouss@DatLuthor@benshapiro No, but you are the one that diverted the conversion about the utility of prayer to the ultimate question about the origins of the universe. As if not having an answer to that mystery is an indication of a creator and a validation of prayer.
@PhillyGameday @Arxl_Blacktip @FightInequalit1 Jeff Bezos. A seriously demanding boss no doubt, but you don't have to take the job with him. He has created new markets around the world. Massive net good.
@Majority54 ep.4 Appreciate the valuable insight into Salam's life experience, but with respect, if your goal here is to wade into the controversy, you have only wrestled with paper tigers. Take on the oppositions best arguments, not Fox's blatant ignorance.
@seriouspod re: Laurier I agree with & value all of your conclusions, but–and maybe this is just tone policing– it seems like you are at pains to make these concessions. I respect that your skepticism > your bias, but I think the partisan undertones are dissuasive. 2¢
@Majority54 Enjoyed the podcast, but if the goal is to represent the Right Wing argument then I think you missed something important. Please engage with the “hands up don’t shoot” narrative vs. the cop acting in self-defence.
@Rob_Reid Really impressed with the podcast! Question: If you had to make a short list of the smartest people ever, who would you include that is not directly affiliated with the world of maths or hard science? Thank you.