In which an anonymous Twitter account with 250 followers is doing far better journalism than a NY Times writer.
You are still welcome to any show, @JessicaValenti. You don’t even have to say hi to me or @jordanbpeterson!
One of the best analyses I’ve seen on journalistic credibility! Kudos to @pragmatometer — and give the red bird a follow if you enjoy thoughtful dissections of opinion pieces!
Thread by @pragmatometer:
https://t.co/sSRMWi54sK
@cheapandvulgar @stormynormy42@emac_v@RubinReport Someone learned a new word recently,and thinks it can be spewed out to win arguments—without actually making a point.
@NomadTommyb@Inhisownwrite_@rickygervais For someone preaching about narrow-mindedness, you sure do have quite the all-encompassing list of “it’s a joke” outcomes.
Other than this I agree with you.
@t4llbot @RogerVoltaire @Naryanoodle @jordanbpeterson However, where I think you’re misinterpreting him is when you say that he is advocating such a hierarchy. That’s not his point at all. He’s saying that the hierarchy is not a social construction, and in order to address it we need to understand that.
@t4llbot @RogerVoltaire @Naryanoodle @jordanbpeterson I actually hold a bachelor’s degree in evolution and ecology from UC Davis (one of the top ecology schools in the world I might add) and I can say without a doubt that Peterson’s argument that dominance hierarchies are biological intrinsic is absolute fact.
@jordanbpeterson Absolutely wonderful article. Hard to imagine anyone reading it in its entirety and not being able to agree with its reasonable and well articulated arguments.
@t4llbot @RogerVoltaire @Naryanoodle @jordanbpeterson There are plenty of reasons to justly criticize the man, he’s by no means perfect. However, the points you’ve laid out aren’t exactly solid.
@t4llbot @RogerVoltaire @Naryanoodle @jordanbpeterson So you’re criticizing him for acknowledging his negative subconscious thoughts on air and intentionally steering clear of them?