Combinotourist

[Combinotourist @MarchtoCharm]

@shahlock 12345!

[Combinotourist @MarchtoCharm]

@shahlock 12334 123 1234

[Combinotourist @MarchtoCharm]

@CesarVMB @jamestanton This gives the x value, not the y value.

[Combinotourist @MarchtoCharm]

@DeeSTEM_Teach My hometown is 20 minutes from Lima, Ohio. Why was he in that area?

[Combinotourist @MarchtoCharm]

The public persona of Elon Musk is a fictional fucking character who would do a better job.

[Combinotourist @MarchtoCharm]

Hey @RavensburgerNA, I bought and put this puzzle together, but it was missing a piece (top border). What the heck? Isn't Ravensburger supposed to be the best?

[Combinotourist @MarchtoCharm]

@davidwees The first example is actually because multiplication is associative and commutative!

(80 * 1/100) * 25 = 80 * (25 * 1/100)

[Combinotourist @MarchtoCharm]

@AlanMackeyJr @GoodPoliticGuy Apparently you love talking about getting off a lot. Perhaps you should log off and go outside for a while?

[Combinotourist @MarchtoCharm]

@TheIndianRed @sonukg4india C could be negative.

[Combinotourist @MarchtoCharm]

@davidwees Because students need to pass state-mandated tests.

[Combinotourist @MarchtoCharm]

@DavidKButlerUoA @nathanday314 This is my hands-down favorite Desmos graph ever. :)

[Combinotourist @MarchtoCharm]

@CmonMattTHINK Something like f(x) = {0 when x = -2, |tan(pi/4 x)| on (-2, 2), 0 on [2, 4]}?

[Combinotourist @MarchtoCharm]

@kait_nova What could go wrong?

[Combinotourist @MarchtoCharm]

@GarthIorgy @ACTBrigitte 50 is a bit young, but I think once you collect SS, maybe you don't get to vote anymore? 🤷‍♀️

[Combinotourist @MarchtoCharm]

@CihanPostsThms Proof? I played with condition (1) for a bit and it seems like e is the only one that works, but it's such a weird condition.

[Combinotourist @MarchtoCharm]

@Mrs_Meowmerz Remember the chain rule on the first summand! (needs to be times'd by 3)

[Combinotourist @MarchtoCharm]

@oscarmom355 @KefTheBeerMan @GriffVulture @POTUS That's just naive and stupid.

[Combinotourist @MarchtoCharm]

@DavidKButlerUoA OK. So would it not be possible to evaluate for odd numbers based on the definition?

[Combinotourist @MarchtoCharm]

@DavidKButlerUoA Oh nice! Good to know.