Watercolour Artist & Urban Sketcher. Discover captivating watercolour art of Mark Grant, painting in Ormskirk & Liverpool. Taking commssions from photos.
@AlistairCarns Best time to start is now; yet chips & energy are a two year build. We have the brains. And we have the best data; NHS, BBC, Library, gallery, museums, government archives. We can boot strap an open model and parallel build a clean model. But it's a 4 year, £600billion+ project.
@david_bova@AlistairCarns Best time to start is now; yet chips & energy are a two year build. We have the brains. And we have the best data; NHS, BBC, Library, gallery, museums, government archives. We can boot strap an open model and parallel build a clean model. But it's a 4 year, £700billion+ project.
@AnthropicAI I subbed for Fable. I refuse to support a company functioning in such a country, register your business elsewhere, then restrict access to the US. And I am happy to go forward, otherwise a refund is needed.
@diazjulio0071@AnthropicAI I also subbed for this reason. I refuse to support a company functioning in such a country, register your business elsewhere and restrict access to the US. And I am happy to go forward, otherwise refund is needed.
@John_Agbo01@OpenAI Every step of AI coding someone said, yes but... Everyone was proven wrong. Yes, it can hack broken code but it can't write a working app... It can write a poorly working app but can't design... OK, it can design, but it can't create real assets? Early days
@AstronomyVibes An electron isn’t really a little object with a heroic lifespan. It’s a stable process/excitation with no allowed lower charged state to decay into.
In our terms: persistence is not stuff lasting forever — it’s constraint successfully maintaining a readable pattern.
@ClaudioDrews25 I see from the comments that everyone has vibe coded the same solution. I am getting post-app vibes, the point when every app is written on the fly in line with daily evolving standards. As most apps are just a UI for endpoints
@PhilosophyOfPhy Light is invisible until it transacts.
It isn’t “seen” while crossing space. It becomes visible when it hits something, exchanges energy, and leaves a record — retina, dust, gas, detector.
So the night sky isn’t empty. It’s mostly transit without transaction.
@TravisJonVought@PhysInHistory Thanks, I've ordered the 3 pillars in a unified function of constraint; GR is constraint on motion, QM is constraint on identity and thermodynamics is a constraint on persistence. New paper coming - The Universe of Constraint
@TravisJonVought@QuantumNudge@PhysInHistory You say constraints give no direction. Geometry in GR is a constraint on motion, propagation in a null space. Constraint doesn't tell a thing where to go it limits where it cannot go. Motion is the permitted residue of constraints. Maths is the language of what is admissible.
@zhonnymao@PhysInHistory If they aren't causally readable then they are irrelevant. Like, the boundary of a black hole is impassable, inside it is said to be mathematical zero or to possibly contain a universe. Both claims aren't true. And both claims are irrelevant, as neither can be read.
@PhysInHistory The electron is not “both a wave and a particle” in the everyday sense.
It is a quantum process with wave-like propagation and particle-like records.
The particle is not the hidden object underneath. It is the recordable face of the transaction.