Mark Curran @Mark_Curran_ - Twitter Profile

This is Rocky, the goodest German shepherd Dad checking his tiny pups for the first time and it's pure magic. already dad of the year, no DNA test required. What a gentle giant! He’s gonna be a good Dad

78

11K

721

630

793K

Mark Curran @Mark_Curran_

3 months ago

@BomberBanter_au Don’t do it. Go to the pub 🙃

0

32

Mark Curran @Mark_Curran_

4 months ago

@TurkTalksFC It has been evident in recent weeks that Shaw can’t get up the pitch and assist in attacking. A more dynamic full back required, with Shaw becoming a squad player. Defensively, Shaw still good. Can’t lose all our experienced players.

0

117

Mark Curran @Mark_Curran_

4 months ago

@SwedishRumble Profit is sanity but cash is king. Could you image have decent owners that put cash in…

0

1

0

426

Mark_Curran_ retweeted

The Swedish Rumble 🔰

@SwedishRumble

4 months ago

🚨The "Three years on..." part needs some context -- in reality its "Seven years and two months on..." 🔺The Premier League's investigation started in December 2018. 🔺City refused to give the PL the requested information to conduct the investigation -- which in itself is a breach of the rules. 🔺This forced the PL to appoint a panel that could force City to hand over information to the PL (or sanction them if they didn't). 🔺City however immediately launched a legal assault against the PL's appointment of the panel intended to force City to hand over information. 🔺At the center of City's case, initiated in November 2019, was the fact that the PL kept a long list of high-ranking barristers or retired judges from which the "judges" of the panel, that will decide the case, could be chosen from. City claimed that this made the judges for the panel impartial. This objection was shot down by English courts in March 2021. While City "lost" the objection, they manage to delay the charges from December 2018 to March 2021 -- by not handing over the requested information. 27 months. 🔺City then fought the courts to keep the proceedings confidential (a view shared by the PL, i.e. that they should be kept confidential). In July 2021, Lord Justice Males issued the ruling with the below famous statement. 🔺After more litigation in the English courts, battles to prevent information being handed over to the PL, and information that to this day has not been handed over by the account of the charges being increased from "115" to "130", the charges were made public three years ago. God knows what else has gone on behind the scenes.

SwedishRumble's tweet photo. 🚨The "Three years on..." part needs some context -- in reality its "Seven years and two months on..."
🔺The Premier League's investigation started in December 2018.
🔺City refused to give the PL the requested information to conduct the investigation -- which in itself is a breach of the rules.
🔺This forced the PL to appoint a panel that could force City to hand over information to the PL (or sanction them if they didn't).
🔺City however immediately launched a legal assault against the PL's appointment of the panel intended to force City to hand over information.
🔺At the center of City's case, initiated in November 2019, was the fact that the PL kept a long list of high-ranking barristers or retired judges from which the "judges" of the panel, that will decide the case, could be chosen from. City claimed that this made the judges for the panel impartial. This objection was shot down by English courts in March 2021. While City "lost" the objection, they manage to delay the charges from December 2018 to March 2021 -- by not handing over the requested information. 27 months.
🔺City then fought the courts to keep the proceedings confidential (a view shared by the PL, i.e. that they should be kept confidential). In July 2021, Lord Justice Males issued the ruling with the below famous statement.
🔺After more litigation in the English courts, battles to prevent information being handed over to the PL, and information that to this day has not been handed over by the account of the charges being increased from "115" to "130", the charges were made public three years ago.

God knows what else has gone on behind the scenes.

27

733

254

78

63K

Mark_Curran_ retweeted

The 1958

@The__1958

5 months ago

🗣️DO NOT GET DISTRACTED BY CLUB & PRESS PR Intended to move the narrative away from the real issues at the club. Glazers, Ratcliffe and INEOS We deserve better and our traditions need to be respected. •⁠ ⁠Show fans are important with actions and not platitudes •⁠ ⁠Reward loyalty stop exploiting it •⁠ ⁠Act as the blueprint for other clubs to follow in protecting loyalty and fan culture •⁠ ⁠Sort the ticketing and fairness system out •⁠ ⁠Remove the profit and loss mandate for the ticket office its the wild west. •⁠ ⁠Start acting like a bastion of the premier league Performances on the pitch, signings, managers and a Disneyland circus stadium experience are secondary. The 1958🇾🇪