For years, we have used encryption and other math to secure communications over the internet, making them tamperproof, and protecting privacy
ICP (Internet Computer Protocol) is a bet that the same needs to be done for compute and data. Cloud engines will now take it mainstream
@celticway1888 Maybe the agents aren’t the problem…on many occasion the problem is looking right back at you in the mirror, and you just don’t want to see it, in fact you refuse to see it.
$ICP Signal ♾🚨
Every country on earth is trying to build a sovereign cloud no one else can control. Almost none can.
France's "sovereign cloud" runs on Microsoft.
Germany built two. One on Microsoft, one on Google.
The EU poured €300 billion into EuroStack and GAIA-X.
Even the European Commission's own websites run on AWS.
The EU Parliament voted 471 to 68 to cut its dependence on US tech. Then kept renting it anyway.
You cannot build sovereignty on rented ground. And you cannot build it by swapping one landlord for another.
Every nation is chasing the same thing. Not one has caught it.
Who really owns the internet, and the one exit every country keeps missing....Which nation takes it Next?
See the signal♾🚨
Link in comments
🚨 WHY ISN’T THE $ICP COMMUNITY SHOUTING ABOUT THIS? 🚨
We keep asking what the catalyst for mass adoption looks like.
Then someone builds an AI platform that automatically migrates existing Web2 applications onto the Internet Computer…
…and hardly anyone is talking about it.
This technology delivers on its stated capabilities, developers could potentially take existing applications and migrate their backend, frontend, authentication and data into $ICP canisters with dramatically less engineering effort than a traditional rewrite.
Think about what that could mean.
• Existing Web2 businesses exploring blockchain without starting from scratch.
• Lower migration barriers.
• Faster adoption.
• More applications deployed on-chain.
• More canister creation.
• More compute demand.
• More cycles consumed.
• More network activity.
This is exactly the type of infrastructure the ecosystem has been asking for.
The conversation shouldn’t only be about token price.
It should be about the engineering being built.
Every week there seems to be another major development:
✅ AI development tools
✅ Autonomous agents
✅ Confidential computing
✅ Multi-chain integration
✅ Enterprise infrastructure
✅ Web2 migration platforms
The pace of development around $ICP is extraordinary.
Huge credit to @mingleberrymedi@dominic_w, @PierreSamaties and @dfinity for continuing to push the boundaries of what’s possible.
The community needs to amplify developments like this. If we don’t tell the world what is being built, nobody else will.
#ICP #InternetComputer #DFINITY #AI #Web3 #Blockchain #CloudComputing #DigitalSovereignty #OnChainAI #Canisters #BuildOnICP #WorldComputer #SovereignCloud #DecentralizedCloud
If you enjoy my research and posts, you can support me with ICP:
1e672d038cebc619d93186418fa98f6499dbdb9cfdfac54f366c61a4a4ee4362
https://t.co/l9yEdI3PHy
On the 9th June 2026 we wrote an open letter to the board of @CelticFC Plc.
We asked for one thing: a meeting. Us, or a delegation of the board, to sit down and discuss The Celtic Paradox, our review of the club built entirely on Celtic's own audited accounts, ahead of the AGM.
We said we would publish their reply, whatever it said.
A month on, there has been no reply. No, yes, no no, not even an acknowledgement.
So here is the letter, in full. Read it and judge for yourselves.
We are supporters and shareholders asking, in good faith, for a conversation about the club we all own a part of. That should not be too much to ask.
#CSL
🚨 JULY COULD BE THE MONTH EVERYTHING CHANGES FOR $ICP. 🚨
(Please repost) let’s flood X with the truth)
The watchlist is stacked:
🚢 Cloud Engines
☕ Caffeine
🌐 OISY
💹 MULTI/DEX
🇨🇭 Swiss Subnet
…and we’ve also been told to expect a special announcement before the end of the month. @PierreSamaties
Individually, each of these has the potential to expand what the Internet Computer can do.
Together?
This starts looking less like a blockchain roadmap and more like the rollout of a complete sovereign cloud, AI, identity and DeFi ecosystem.
The market is still valuing $ICP at around a $1B market cap while the technology is targeting problems measured in trillions of dollars.
Sometimes the market takes time to catch up.
If this roadmap starts landing over the coming weeks, I genuinely believe many people will wish they’d paid more attention.
I’m staying patient.
I’m staying staked.
I’m staying bullish.
Conviction > Noise.
#ICP #InternetComputer #DFINITY #Web3 #AI #CloudComputing #DeFi #Blockchain #Crypto #CaffeineAI #OISY #MULTIDEX #CloudEngines #Swiss #BuildOnICP
💙 ICP Donations:
1e672d038cebc619d93186418fa98f6499dbdb9cfdfac54f366c61a4a4ee4362
@Justin_Bons My assessment of you and your $ICP knowledge.
Meet your maker.......what ever you type further, I can technically counter with FACTS... Keep Jogging...
The so called author understands some general blockchain concepts, but shows weak knowledge of how $ICP actually works.
The repeated issue is comparing $ICP to Ethereum-style PoS and then claiming $ICP is broken because it does not use the same architecture.
That is not analysis.
That is category error.
Examples:
• Subnets are treated as if they are simple weak validator sets.
• Chain-key ECDSA is compared to Ethereum contracts, which do not provide the same native protocol-level signing model.
• HTTPS outcalls are dismissed because external data still needs trust, while ignoring that $ICP removes a separate oracle dependency layer.
• Canisters, NNS, SNS and neurons are called “technobabble”, despite being defined technical components.
• “Nothing at stake” is claimed, while ignoring node-provider economics, governance staking, NNS admission, subnet distribution and protocol-level consensus.
There are fair criticisms to make about $ICP.
Subnet security assumptions should be discussed.
Node-provider governance should be discussed.
Controller/admin risk should be discussed.
Oracle data-source trust should be discussed.
But this thread repeatedly mixes valid risk topics with inaccurate conclusions.
My verdict
He knows enough crypto terminology to sound technical.
He does not appear to understand $ICP’s architecture deeply enough to fairly assess it.
Different does not mean dishonest.
Different does not mean insecure.
Different does not mean fake.
If you want to criticise $ICP, bring precise claims, evidence, and architecture-level comparisons.
Not vibes dressed up as security analysis.
@Marmightlite@EsselLeroy@ICPapprentice@BobbyO_
Farage said his car brakes had been tampered with - didn't happen
His house was firebombed - didn't happen
Parliament security told him not to hold surgeries - didn't happen
His phone was hacked - didn't happen
Etc, etc....
🚨 MASSIVE $ICP ANNOUNCEMENT PART 2 ;-) 🚨
THE INTERNET COMPUTER IS NO LONGER JUST BLOCKCHAIN INFRASTRUCTURE.
IT IS BECOMING THE FULL AI ENTERPRISE STACK.
Dominic Williams has just made it unequivocally clear,
Following MULTI/DEX, Cloud Engines, and an Open SaaS suite, all built using $ICP’s AIware technology, the Internet Computer is positioning itself as the new stack for enterprises that want AI at the core of their operations.
Read that again.
MULTI/DEX
Cloud Engines
Open SaaS
AIware
Enterprise AI infrastructure
On-chain execution
Sovereign compute
Tamperproof backends
Ownerless autonomous systems
This is not another DeFi app.
This is not another L2.
This is not another blockchain chasing memecoins and hype cycles.
$ICP is building the infrastructure layer for the next era of software:
AI-native
On-chain
Autonomous
Serverless
Sovereign
Tamperproof
Enterprise-grade
Enterprises do not need another chatbot wrapper.
They need secure infrastructure where AI can run real software, manage real data, execute real workflows, and operate without depending on fragile centralised cloud stacks.
That is exactly where $ICP is heading.
MULTI/DEX shows DeFi can move toward CEX-level functionality without giving up decentralisation.
Cloud Engines show that applications can be deployed as sovereign serverless backends.
Open SaaS shows that software itself can become open, verifiable, composable, and autonomous.
AIware shows where the whole thing is going.
This is the new stack.
Not rented cloud.
Not closed SaaS.
Not fake decentralisation.
Not token theatre.
TRUE AI + TRUE DeFi + TRUE ON-CHAIN SOFTWARE.
Built on $ICP.
Big summer?
No.
This is the start of the Internet Computer becoming the operating layer for AI-driven enterprise software.
Most chains are still trying to scale transactions.
$ICP is scaling computation, software, AI, and ownership.
The market has not priced this in.
Not even close.
@dominic_w@dfinity@PierreSamaties@Marmightlite@caffeineai
ICP donation address:
1e672d038cebc619d93186418fa98f6499dbdb9cfdfac54f366c61a4a4ee4362
Real Web2 site → fully on-chain on the Internet Computer - 20 min
🌐 Web2 → ⛓️ $ICP
React/Vite → Served from Caniser
Supabase Postgres → Motoko stable storage
Supabase Auth → II 2.0
Supabase Storage → asset canister
Edge Functions → Motoko methods
https://t.co/QxiTXFNzBg
🚨 CLAUDE GOES DOWN. AGAIN. 🚨 The solution is $ICP
Claude, one of the world’s leading AI platforms, suffered a major outage, leaving users unable to access services until Anthropic restored operations.
This is the problem with centralized infrastructure.
As AI becomes embedded into banking, healthcare, government, logistics, defence, and critical infrastructure, outages are no longer just an inconvenience — they become operational and financial risks.
The question isn’t how smart AI becomes.
The question is:
Who controls the infrastructure that AI runs on?
Most AI systems today still depend on centralized cloud providers and centralized architectures. A single failure can impact millions of users simultaneously.
This is why decentralized compute matters.
$ICP is building something fundamentally different:
✅ Decentralized global infrastructure
✅ Applications running directly on-chain
✅ No dependence on a single cloud provider
✅ Tamper-resistant execution
✅ Real-time performance with web-speed user experience
✅ Infrastructure designed to survive beyond a single company, server, or region
The world is obsessed with AI models.
Few are paying attention to the infrastructure layer that must support them.
As AI adoption accelerates, resilience, security, and decentralization will become just as important as intelligence itself.
The future of AI cannot rely on single points of failure.
$ICP is already building for that future.
☕ Support my work on $ICP and decentralized computing
1e672d038cebc619d93186418fa98f6499dbdb9cfdfac54f366c61a4a4ee4362
#ICP #InternetComputer #DFINITY #AI #Claude #Anthropic #ArtificialIntelligence #CloudComputing #CyberSecurity #Web3 #Blockchain #DigitalSovereignty #Decentralization
Turns out, the rumours of Elvis Costello’s demise have been greatly exaggerated. He was excellent last night. A setlist to die for, a perfect mix of faithful renditions and new arrangements. I actually preferred hearing the new takes. When he moved to the acoustic guitar and did a stripped down Beyond Belief into Clubland it was magic, Who Will The Next Fool Be was mesmerising. Best of all, highlight of the night, was this aching, slowburn Everyday I Write the Book. Spine-tingling stuff.
His voice? I thought it held up well. In fact, there was points he seemed to be showing off to let us know he could still do it. He started I Can’t Stand Up For Falling Down as a torch song, encouraging the crowd to join in and I thought, “listen, mate, nobody in here is singing like that!” There were a lot of moments he really went for it and it was glorious.
Was it always there? Nope, there were a few times his voice didn’t quite do what he wanted it to. But they would be followed by him taking a sip from one of the drinks he had dotted round the stage and going again. I like that. Shows he’s willing to suffer a bit to put on a great show. The first few songs it seemed to be more the sound mixing letting things down than EC. Once that was sorted, I thought he was in fine voice for most the gig.
The thing is, as much as it’s about Costello, there is also a thrill in watching those musicians on stage. Davey Faragher’s bass playing is fluid and full of feeling. Charlie Sexton is a blinding guitarist, a real privilege to see and hear. It was pretty funny when Costello remarked that he didn’t know how to play the intro to the next one but Sexton did, leading straight into the aching guitar lines of Alison. Steve Nieve is a wizard. Surrounded by instruments, he spends the gig jumping between them, often mid song. Pete Thomas is an absolute machine. That guy can play like few others. So inventive, a fantastic drummer. It’s a great band Costello has, as he always has had, and it’s a joy to spend time with them.
Overall, a great gig, by a man who never takes the easy route. When he launched into Little Triggers early doors, you could tell he was up for it. And that is something I thought about afterwards. There is a setlist amongst that material that he could play without a bit of strain. There are songs he clearly copes with easier than others. Especially when he does the hard hitting tunes, he has to rise above them. But still he goes for it. I guess he’s just never lost his love for playing a bit of rock n roll. And I’ll always love hearing it.
On a side note two things.
One, Chris Difford was fantastic. A natural raconteur, he was genuinely hilarious. His between song patter had the audience in stitches. And the songs, well, it goes without saying they are top drawer. But hearing these versions was a real pleasure. He did Up the Junction, one of my all-time favourite songs, and I had that familiar feeling I get at gigs “that’s that song I love. Thats the guy that wrote it. I’m hearing it right now, live” A wonderful moment.
Lastly, fair play to the wee guy in front of me, who looked like he just stepped out of the I Can’t Stand Up For Falling Down video. He had the hair, the sharp suit, the glasses, and he danced just like EC in that video. And he was there himself, not a solitary fuck given, seeing his hero. Respect.
Una Comisión de Investigación concluye que Israel está cometiendo actos de genocidio al matar deliberadamente a niños y niñas palestinos en Gaza.
https://t.co/z5b6dGua1J
Une commission d’enquête internationale mandatée par le Conseil des droits de l’homme de l’@ONU_fr a accusé, mardi 23 juin, Israël de « cibler » les enfants palestiniens dans la bande de Gaza, dénonçant une fois encore un « génocide » en cours.
#HRC62
https://t.co/OV0DdwCBQ9
#Israeli authorities & security forces have deliberately targeted #Palestinian children resulting in #genocide, crimes against humanity & war crimes, the @UN Commission of Inquiry on the Occupied Palestinian Territory & Israel says in new report. #HRC62
➡️ https://t.co/IWsZkK7eh7
استهدفت #السلطات وقوات الأمن الإسرائيلية الأطفال الفلسطينيين عمداً مما أدى إلى ارتكاب #جريمة الإبادة الجماعية وجرائم ضد الإنسانية وجرائم حرب حسب تقرير جديد صادر عن @لجنة الأمم المتحدة المعنية بالتحقيق في الأرض الفلسطينية المحتلة وإسرائيل. #HRC62
https://t.co/15XwJqsK7n