Internationally unfamous artist, outdoorsey Chislehurstian and quiff headed amateur Daddy. As La Rochefoucauld said 'Modesty is the worst form of conceit'.
🚨 Did Andy Burnham breach the Ministerial Code?
The timeline behind No 10 North raises serious questions.
Today I’ve written to Sir Laurie Magnus and Dame Antonia Romeo asking them to investigate.
As a member of the public I can’t force an investigation…
…so hopefully an MP picks this up and demands answers.
🚨 WHY did Manchester City Council approve a lease for the exact Heron House suite now used as No.10 North on 10th June 2026?
Andy Burnham wasn’t even an MP until the Makerfield by-election on 18th June.
He didn’t become Prime Minister until 20th July.
So why was the temporary headquarters for “No.10 North” being signed off weeks before he was even elected to Parliament?
How does a serving Mayor “know” he’s about to win a by-election, get parachuted into the leadership, and be crowned PM within weeks — unless the entire sequence was already locked in?
If you’re not asking these questions, you’re choosing not to see it:
The by-election was engineered.
The MPs who voted him in were already aligned.
The system was primed and ready.
Burnham wasn’t elected into No.10. He was placed.
Demand answers. Share this. Force the media to confront the timeline.
The public record is right here:
https://t.co/T7c7qdAmpF
An estimated 40 million tons of wind turbine blades will end up in landfills by 2050.
Each modern blade weighs around 10 to 15 tons--mostly fiberglass and epoxy composites with 1 to 2 tons of carbon fiber, balsa and foam, plus roughly a ton of steel and copper for structural support and lightning protection.
All mined, smelted and transported using fossil fuels.
Then once they wear out, after just 15 years, those complex materials are almost impossible to recycle, so most are simply buried.
It's another hidden cost of green energy and the complete opposite of sustainable.
New research claims human emissions are not driving atmospheric CO2.
A paper by Dai Ato ran multiple linear regressions for 1959 to 2022, testing two predictors of the annual CO2 increase: sea surface temperature and human emissions.
The result was clear: when the oceans warmed, CO2 levels rose almost exactly in step - about two to three parts per million for every one degree Celsius of warming.
Adding human emissions to the model didn't change the outcome.
Using only ocean temperature, the model reproduced global CO2 levels with near-perfect accuracy - a correlation of 0.995 and an error of just one to two ppm by 2022.
The main factor governing the annual increase in atmospheric CO2 concentration is sea surface temperature rather than human emissions.
Earlier studies have shown the same pattern. Temperature changes first, CO2 follows.
If Ato is correct, cutting human emissions won't lower atmospheric CO2 because it's the oceans that set the pace.
Occasionally (not too often)...I share a video clip that should really be shared with every human on the planet. Seriously.
This is one of those - the only clip people need to see, on Rockefeller's Climate Change project:
This is nonsense.
Over the last century, there has been no increase in heatwaves in the United States, as confirmed in a new paper just published in the Journal of Theoretical and Applied Climatology. Christy (2026) states very clearly,
🗨️ “𝘛𝘩𝘦 𝘳𝘦𝘴𝘶𝘭𝘵𝘴 𝘪𝘯𝘥𝘪𝘤𝘢𝘵𝘦 𝘵𝘩𝘢𝘵 𝘦𝘹𝘵𝘳𝘦𝘮𝘦𝘴 𝘪𝘯 𝘩𝘦𝘢𝘵-𝘳𝘦𝘭𝘢𝘵𝘦𝘥 𝘮𝘦𝘵𝘳𝘪𝘤𝘴 𝘧𝘰𝘳 𝘥𝘢𝘪𝘭𝘺 𝘛𝘔𝘢𝘹 𝘪𝘯 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘴𝘶𝘮𝘮𝘦𝘳 𝘩𝘢𝘷𝘦 𝘯𝘰𝘵 𝘪𝘯𝘤𝘳𝘦𝘢𝘴𝘦𝘥 𝘢𝘯𝘥 𝘪𝘯 𝘧𝘢𝘤𝘵 𝘰𝘧𝘵𝘦𝘯 𝘴𝘩𝘰𝘸 𝘮𝘰𝘥𝘦𝘴𝘵 𝘥𝘦𝘤𝘭𝘪𝘯𝘦𝘴 𝘴𝘪𝘯𝘤𝘦 1899, 𝘥𝘶𝘦 𝘮𝘰𝘴𝘵𝘭𝘺 𝘵𝘰 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘦𝘢𝘳𝘭𝘺 𝘩𝘦𝘢𝘵 𝘦𝘷𝘦𝘯𝘵𝘴 𝘥𝘶𝘳𝘪𝘯𝘨 1925–1954.”
🔗 https://t.co/DSJXxVVKZa
Torpenhow Hill, England
When the Saxons arrived and asked the locals what that hill was called, the Welsh replied, “Pen,” which simply means hill in Welsh.
The Saxons, apparently not spotting they’d already been given the full answer, added their own word for hill: tor. So it became Torpen - literally Hill Hill.
A few centuries later, the Norse turned up and repeated the exercise, adding haugr, their word for hill. Now it was effectively Torpenhaugr - Hill Hill Hill.
Then the English arrived, looked at the whole thing, shrugged, and added “Hill” on the end for good measure.
Thus we ended up with Torpenhow Hill:
Hill Hill Hill Hill.
It’s comforting to know that for over a thousand years, successive generations have been independently deciding that the previous lot hadn’t made it quite clear enough that it was, in fact, a hill.
Language is magnificent.
Humans… less so.🤷🏻♂️🤣
I have been trying tell people this for years…
The key take away, is that the starting point for the modern warming trend, was the end of a very cold period, that spanned centuries & is commonly known as the Little Ice Age.
It’s not a crisis 🙄
Warren Buffet: "I can end the deficit in five minutes. You juts pass a law that says that anytime there is a deficit of more than 3% of GDP, all sitting members of Congress are ineligible for reelection."
Questo è il fiume Elba nel 1904: Il letto del fiume è in gran parte asciutto, le persone passeggiano al di sotto.
Oggi viene spacciato come "catastrofe climatica" senza precedenti.
I livelli d’acqua estremamente bassi ci sono sempre stati, molto prima dei SUV e della CO₂.
Torniamo ai fatti e lasciamo l'isteria agli isterici.
Produzieren Windräder unterm Strich überhaupt Energie?
Es gibt viele Kritiker, die bezweifeln, dass Windräder im Endeffekt überhaupt nennenswert Energie „erzeugen“.
Ein großer Teil der Windräder in Deutschland stammt ganz oder teilweise aus China. Das zur Herstellung beispielsweise benötigte Eisenerz muss gefördert werden, zu Eisen verarbeitet, transportiert, dann zu Stahl (unter Zusatz u.a. von Stickstoff) veredelt werden, aus dem Stahl muss das Windrad in Großanlagen geschmiedet, anschließend mit Schwertransporten zum nächsten Hafen transportiert, dann nach Europa verschifft und mit Riesenkränen aufgestellt werden. All die hierfür benötigte Energie wird in China größtenteils in Kohlekraftwerken erzeugt.
Ob ein Windrad also „netto“ tatsächlich deutlich mehr Energie produziert, als zu seiner Herstellung und Aufstellung verbraucht wurde, wird beispielsweise von D. Weißbach u. A. in der Studie „Energy intensities, EROIs … and energy payback times of electricity generating power plants“ angezweifelt.
Für Windräder kommt Weißbach auf ein „buffered EROI“ von 4, traditionelle deutsche Kernkraftwerke kamen auf ein EORI von 75 bis 105.
EROI zwischen 3 und 5 gelten als „kaum sinnvoll für eine moderne Gesellschaft (außer als Nischenlösung).“
50 years ago UK saw 104F/40C. Met office have erased & adjusted data to make the past seem cooler, & put thermometers next to runways & in amongst acres of greenhouses at Kew gardens to make today seem warmer. But after 50 years of CO2 emissions it's still not as hot as 1976.
Deze foto is de stalen wapening van de basis van een windmolen. Er zal nog tussen 600 en 800 M3 beton moeten worden toegevoegd dat is een gewicht van bijna 2000 ton!
Als de windmolen is ontmanteld, blijft deze basis voor altijd begraven in de grond.
Tijdens de exploitatie van de windturbine zal de mast door de wind op een zeer lage frequentie trillen en deze trillingen worden via de sokkel overgebracht in een straal van meer dan 100 meter rond de sokkel. Dierenleven wordt binnen deze zone hierdoor onmogelijk gemaakt.
De bladen van de turbine werken tegelijkertijd als gehaktmolen voor vogels.
Andy Burnham's wife secured the contract to supply EV infrastructure and energy supply to Greater Manchester!
She is Marie-France van Heel, she is a director of Be.EV & Iduna Infrastructure, she is also Chief Marketing Officer for Octopus Energy.