@agniyuta Swami and Harris have had conversation. But the thing harris agrees is negation of self. Ie in much contmperory context I is an illusion
Is this possible under advaita? Both Vishishtadvaita and Advaita affirms a self but it's not an illusion. I is Brahman.
@star_stufff I think this view is old. Kerr spacetime has difficulties in deriving kerr space time and for instance ADS 3 BH can't exist in Kerr spacetime.
@agniyuta Even to argue for continuous negation untill Brahman you need justification for neti neti that is given by Najarjun actually. Without void you can't have epistemic grounding for neti neti. Nagarjun don't argue for reduction. What he actually argues for is Dependent arising
@star_stufff Usually people would say landau at extreme cases Pauli but extremely rarely Sommerfield. It's good I don't obejct it but not common. An anomaly 😭😎
@LongFormMath Once mathematican ms raghunathan told.There are two kinds of mathematican one looks to attack problems and other builds a theory inwhich many problems can be resolved like Galois Dr jay do you think ai replace the first type of mathematican but not the second one