@scooter_burn23@Scopuli@Sunny_DeeLit3@briankeepsworth "the dog is not evil for doing so"
And would humanity be evil for following their instinct, if there was no moral compass?
Again, you are comparing punishing a dog to punishing people, based on the fact that humans are "higher creatures". What makes us higher, if not morality?
@scooter_burn23@Scopuli@Sunny_DeeLit3@briankeepsworth Genesis was not written as a literal account of how God created the world and how humanity fell, and that's alright. The meaning of the text remains unchanged.
@scooter_burn23@Scopuli@Sunny_DeeLit3@briankeepsworth That explanation falls absolutely short when you compare how God deals with human beings as compared to how you deal with your dog.
Would you condemn your dog to face the consequences that Adam and Eve faced for their sin? Would that make any sense to you?
@Scopuli@Sunny_DeeLit3@briankeepsworth I'm sorry about the terrible answers you received for a very valuable question
My honest answer: that question demonstrates why the first chapters of Genesis should not be read as a literal description of facts
Even so, they are still useful, deep and relevant for christianity
Tem mais minutos ouvidos que eu na retrospectiva Spotify: vagabundo encostado, vida mansa, faz nada da vida
Tem menos minutos ouvidos que eu na retrospectiva Spotify: aculturado, não sabe aproveitar a vida, alienado, não aprecia arte, massa de manobra