Mark David Ledbetter, history writer channeling Martin Van Buren. Matty was antiwar, pro small decentralized government, a sophisticated free market thinker.
@areyoureal2019@ErrolWebber@elonmusk@TheDemocrats Yep. The Reps and Dems are the two halves of the Uniparty. Fortunately, Trump is not actually a member. He is, come to think of it, a RINO, but in a good way.
@hvdm1987@Amina_io@hvdm1987
Herman, are you in Malta? This is a Waymo in SF. Autonomous Vehicle. No driver. She has no control over the car and the car is programmed to not move as long as anyone or anything is in front of it. She has no way to ‘get out of there.’
@Victorshi2020 “Take it from the people who knew him best.”
Consider who these people are and the threat they describe. Neocons dedicated to forever wars and the Deep State. If Trump is a threat, he’s my man.
If Harris is their protector, she is an existential threat to core Americanism.
@harris_wins She was not bad. But hard to judge since it was so carefully staged.
Learned little about actual policy, just her “values haven’t changed.”
And learned from the build up that she can’t make a spontaneous decision without a team to spend several weeks on rules and logistics.
@BrandtRobinson @AGAndrewBailey @BrandtRobinson
Brandt: “The rule of law HAS been followed.”
Actually, no. If the rule of law is followed against one side but not the other, it’s no longer the rule of law.
@tedlieu@VivekGRamaswamy If it surprised you, it’s because you don’t understand Vivek. He is so confident and grounded in his beliefs that he is not personally bothered by other people’s beliefs. He disputes them rationally. That’s good enough. In fact, it’s perfect. No intellectual’s typical hyperbole.
@EudaimoniaEsq@VivekGRamaswamy@AnnCoulter When you’re supremely confident and grounded in your beliefs, you have no need to “stand up for yourself.” You only need to let her express what she believes and then counter with what you believe. Vivek handled it perfectly.
@TKearns11 @Woofkoof@Phil_Lewis_ It’s not a “put up or shut up” situation because he isn’t claiming to have the evidence. He’s claiming the government is hiding the evidence. Which makes it a release the evidence situation.
@realandrealoko_@delk@DavidZipper @realandrealoco_
Okay, so lives saved are a side effect rather than the number one priority. Are you not ok with that?
@zippkode@realandrealoko_@delk@DavidZipper@zippkode
Karl, I am guessing you are pro military and anti-free markets, a weird new trend in this age of the neocon/liberal alliance.
True, radically rising lifespans are not the goal of “capitalist investment strategies,” just a side effect.
I’m ok with that.
@IrishCowboy13@jessethebuilder@xaviaer@Jringo1508 I know such people, too. But it’s still largely ancient history. Neither the times nor people will ever become perfect. But they can and have become better.
@IrishCowboy13@xaviaer@Jringo1508 True. But Xaviaer isn’t really minimizing these factors. He’s pointing out that here and now, for most people, the real problem is MAXIMIZING these factors. History has shifted quite a bit. You’ll be happier living in the here and now than in a different era.
@PatrickW@WalshFreedom Patrick, you may be right but for the wrong reason. Yes, the split kind of started with Trump. But not because he was right or wrong. It was because those infected with TDS couldn’t support ANYTHING that had a whiff of Trump, no matter how reasonable.
@WalshFreedom Joe, events have proven that human nature infects the best of us. To preserve personal beliefs and ideology, scientists reject science; health officials reject health. Example: they turned the Great Barrington doctors (Oxford, Harvard, Stanford) into “fringe epidemiologists.”
@juanguitarskate@MorosKostas@kirk_bowman@streak69@WalshFreedom Juan, your three factors are valid. But there’s more to consider. The number of at risk retirees means Florida SHOULD have more Covid deaths. Also in Florida expect: fewer deaths of despair from lockdown. Longer and better lives for kids not locked out of school.
@EdKrassen Depends on how old you are, Ed. If you’re 62, you probably won’t approve, whether you’re a Dem or a Rep. If you’re 25 and staring at an insolvent system that won’t be there for you, I bet you’ll find it a dandy idea, again whether you’re a Dem or a Rep.
@krassenstein That is to say, Brian, if you simply made an appeal for all people to recognize the humanity of all people, I’d be with you. But denying the humanity of those who don’t agree with you pulls you towards ignorance and hate.
@krassenstein You lost me at “ignorant” and “hateful,” Brian.
My starting assumption for people who proclaim “we are loving and compassionate” and “they are ignorant and hateful” is that those proclaiming this divide are so blinded by ideology they can’t see their own ignorance and hate.