@DerekPederson3 Well, not exclusively. Being able to send $1m across the world in five minutes isn't going to destabilize the economy, but it is sometimes convenient.
@xwanyex It's insane how common covers used to be. I guess if the choices are "write boring, non-single songs" or "do boring covers" and you need to fill up an album, the latter is easier. And probably more fun to do live.
@DerekPederson3 I feel like controlling the Senate and thereby being able to stop every appointment makes a difference in the long term. Federal judges matter, and it would be good if fewer of them came from the Federalist society
@EricHogue0@rwlesq@alwaysadblock And I don't think anyone is actually doing that, to be clear. But we should build systems that are robust to what people could do, not just to what they are actually doing. Assume maximum malevolence at all times.
@EricHogue0@rwlesq@alwaysadblock I don't think that's true. Let's say I'm on the fence about cheating. It would be difficult and dangerous. Seems smart to wait and try to figure out if my cheating will tip the election. The longer I wait, the more information I have.
@gametheory101 Maybe the value of a signal degrades in an iterated game where you keep not using them. Nuclear crying wolf.
But the natural question is: would conventional deployment do better? Is conventional war w/ Russia really any less of a bluff than nuclear?
@LinkofSunshine He wasn't right in a useful sense. A shift from spending $500 at a travel agent to $500 at Expedia should be counted as $1000 of impact instead of $0.
@xwanyex I think you're giving too much credit for precision to Hasan. Himbos don't know about logical quantifiers. And Nick is making a much stronger claim than "there is nonzero change." "I think we know...what works" is, in fact, risible.