Saurophaganax

Christian, BA in Philosophy, Student at Baylor Law School, Gig 'em Aggies, Gig ‘em Bears 🐻

[Ratio Christi TAMU @RChristi_TAMU]

New Semester, New RC
Here’s the first meeting of our Fall semester with Julie, who has been promoted from Assistant CD to the new Chapter Director.
https://t.co/Mo591KlbLW

[Saurophaganax @MichaelBir8003]

@solo1y Draper himself???

[Saurophaganax @MichaelBir8003]

@analyticatheism As Millican notes in his own work on lotteries though, the change to comparative positive vs false positive rates cannot serve as “absolute proof” in the sense that Hume himself intended.
More on this one day on my blog

[Saurophaganax @MichaelBir8003]

It’s not April 1. Haven’t watched but sounds real. Very, very big if true. Everyone’s favorite agnostic philtuber may now be everyone’s favorite Christian philtuber
@majestyofreason
https://t.co/Kd5aR2J5mr

[Saurophaganax @MichaelBir8003]

@worldviewdesign 1. Thoughts on Bliss’s argument that derived existence is not a substantial kind in “Grounding, Fundamentality and Ultimate Explanations?”
2. Would you say Lewis’s Modal Realism has arbitrary limits to it?
3. Do you still like your ontological argument?

[Saurophaganax @MichaelBir8003]

@Alfredovich65 Low Christology as the NT standard (or sole) viewpoint

[Saurophaganax @MichaelBir8003]

@SimonSchfe45703 The belief that worship is done to the referent indifferent to the sense is far more insane and brainrotted. Particularly when the Bible says God does not accept that kind of worship

[Saurophaganax @MichaelBir8003]

@JosiahKissinger Mixed bag. Lots to like.

[Saurophaganax @MichaelBir8003]

I was reading the new book on moral apologetics and Paul Copan’s chapter is accidentally hilarious. Did no one tell him about Aesthetic Deism?
1/2

[Saurophaganax @MichaelBir8003]

It’s been kinda fun to watch the Redditors on here fighting over R/AcademicQuran recently
🍿

[Saurophaganax @MichaelBir8003]

@JosiahKissinger Moral Arguments for God's Existence: Navigating the Terrain

Currently only available online

[Saurophaganax @MichaelBir8003]

@lolophilo77 https://t.co/wHlbM7PG5Z 6.3

[Saurophaganax @MichaelBir8003]

@SteveMcRae_ I struggle to see how an abstraction can be a substance.

[Saurophaganax @MichaelBir8003]

@SteveMcRae_ Why are you using physical as synonymous to ontology? Those are completely different things

[Saurophaganax @MichaelBir8003]

@SteveMcRae_ Your mind and, frankly, the OPs mind are assuredly not abstractions

[Saurophaganax @MichaelBir8003]

https://t.co/OKD0TTvcl2
I have been slacking on announcing these on X recently.
Here’s the new sub chapter, we’re almost done with the problem of the best

[Saurophaganax @MichaelBir8003]

@ArminiusFan @WriterJohnBuck @Philip_Goff That’s Goff’s whole theology…