Michael Aaron Cody

The published voice for static cosmology. First continuum failure mechanism for black holes. Contributor to @RCScience & @FPIF

[Michael Aaron Cody @MichaelCody]

If you haven't already, check out my predatory publishing op-ed and new outlandish piece that builds on it. It was even featured by the man himself, Dr. Donald Ingber, head of the Wyss Institute at @Harvard.

[RealClearScience @RCScience]

"The Big Bang is a remarkable theory, the best account we have, but exactly what it tells us about the whole universe is still open to the rigor of science and debate." by @MichaelCody https://t.co/inIWXBFvnm

[Michael Aaron Cody @MichaelCody]

New piece in @RCScience. @Britannica said the Big Bang happened everywhere at once. We have evidence for a hot early universe, but how do we know it happened everywhere, including places we cannot observe? I wrote about that.

https://t.co/rd48ARKaCE

[Michael Aaron Cody @MichaelCody]

@Britannica Hey @Britannica. Just published this piece in @RCScience about this exact tweet. Have fun reading.

https://t.co/rd48ARKaCE

[Michael Aaron Cody @MichaelCody]

The algorithm on X sucks @elonmusk can we do better please.

[Elon Musk @elonmusk]

Easy way to see how the 𝕏 algorithm works

[Michael Aaron Cody @MichaelCody]

@elonmusk It sucks Elon. 😕

[Michael Aaron Cody @MichaelCody]

Interesting paper by Anto Lonappan, @BrianKeating and Kam Arnold. A twist in the CMB's light could come from space (β) or from a detector pointed slightly off (α). Comparing detectors checks their alignment, since the shared twist cancels out. They found the two methods agree, which is good news for the birefringence measurements built on this data.

https://t.co/Khr36duiWl

[Michael Aaron Cody @MichaelCody]

@Briankeating Good paper. I enjoyed reading it. The degeneracy is fascinating. It feels like the question of what an observation actually tells us is coming up more often in cosmology.

[Michael Aaron Cody @MichaelCody]

@TotalPhilo I wrote about this. No, not even close.

https://t.co/AWzuI7pQT1

[Michael Aaron Cody @MichaelCody]

New paper by Kroupa, @eda_gjergo & Samaras,

"The relevance of the cosmic microwave background for cosmology."

Great paper, but incomplete. Section 4.6 cites everything but the one paper proving the CMB doesn't require an expanding universe.

https://t.co/NYvJlNMLog

[Michael Aaron Cody @MichaelCody]

@Math_files Don’t worry about it. Math is a false god anyway.

https://t.co/AWzuI7pQT1

[Michael Aaron Cody @MichaelCody]

Flexible Static Cosmology.

No cosmological constant.
No post-hoc dataset tuning.
No assumed redshift mechanism.

1st principles redshift transport law within General Relativity. Step by step.

Four papers. Two journals. Ten referees.

https://t.co/k9j5nos3Pj

[Michael Aaron Cody @MichaelCody]

@Wikipedia has a 3-part checklist for static universes. Flexible Static Cosmology has rigorous results on 2 of 3.

1 - Redshift. Derived.
2- CMB spectrum. Preserved.

The third isn't a rule for all static models. FLSC allows a hot early universe.

[Michael Aaron Cody @MichaelCody]

@realDonaldTrump Supreme intelligence to what? LLM's are as dumb as box of rocks. Don't be so quick to surrender human intelligence to a mimic that is good at math. And I wrote about this across fields.

[Michael Aaron Cody @MichaelCody]

@RCScience @McGillOSS I’d love to see the counter-report on cardiovascular effects, sleep disruption, and caffeine dependence.

[Michael Aaron Cody @MichaelCody]

@_tanviir It is. Once you separate what was derived from what was assumed, physics starts looking very different.

[Michael Aaron Cody @MichaelCody]

Static universes were declared dead around 1930. In 2026, they are back.

Flexible Static Cosmology derives geometry and a first-principles redshift mechanism within GR. Expansion is sufficient, not uniquely necessary. Published and peer-reviewed.

Paper-https://t.co/5kD7qzK12H

[Michael Aaron Cody @MichaelCody]

@swapcherrycom No. Expansion was treated as necessary. Showing that it is not uniquely necessary is the result.

[Michael Aaron Cody @MichaelCody]

@AnAnNguyenn98 @chikoevm It is already published and peer-reviewed. The DOI links directly to the paper.

[Michael Aaron Cody @MichaelCody]

@chikoevm Skepticism is fair, but read the paper. FLRW redshift follows from an assumed scale-factor geometry. Here, K(t) is derived as a transport law within ordinary GR.

[Michael Aaron Cody @MichaelCody]

@Harvard https://t.co/huiO6VUB23

[Michael Aaron Cody @MichaelCody]

If you haven't already, check out my predatory publishing op-ed and new outlandish piece that builds on it. It was even featured by the man himself, Dr. Donald Ingber, head of the Wyss Institute at @Harvard.