@MrsEmmaWebber My brother has the same diagnosis (for 15 yrs) and I believe he is increasing dangerous. There is no help or support. I live near Nottingham, he lives in London. We genuinely don’t know what to do. He can present very well, and flip the next minute. What should we do as a family?
New Motion filed by Proctor
(Myles King case)
Most notably, Proctor replaced his phone in February 2024 and didn’t keep the old one. (Remember Proctor testified at the federal grand jury on 2/1/2024, so it’s likely he replaced his phone after his testimony). Also, he doesn’t want to share any communications with Elizabeth Proctor (I wonder why).
@moving_charlie@Matt_Pinner My landlords agent visits every 6mths. We tell them about the decaying property, loose bricks on walls, damp rotting. They spent £3.5k replacing the shower unit (and only that) and expect us to do floor and decorating. Then rent goes up to pay back the repairs. Cycle goes on.
There is no reasonable basis to conclude that an attorney as aggressive, prepared and meticulous as Brennan sincerely "didn't know" that the holes from the back of the hoody were created by his own witness who documented them in a report, already testified and is slated to testify again as a rebuttal witness. It is hard to fathom that he could have sincerely believed the holes came from an alleged car accident. If he did, this would have been a part of Dr. Wolfe's cross rather than re-cross. The holes would have been shown to the jury when he introduced the hoody. Mistakes do happen. But Brennan appears to have held this back and then pounced to give the jury the implication that the holes were consistent with an alleged car accident and that a key opinion of Dr. Wolfe was wrong. Put simply, he tried to end the examination with a huge "gotcha" moment but instead was caught red handed in conduct, that if unchecked, would have intentionally and materially mislead the jury. The instruction by the judge was rather weak and the jury should be told about the exhibits not offered into evidence and they should be allowed to conclude that that was a deliberate attempt by the prosecutor to mislead them. Finally, it was very telling that as Bob slammed Brennan with very serious ethical violations, the prosecutor never once tried to defend himself or push back other than sheepishly claiming he made a mistake. Attorneys whose ethics are unfairly maligned always push back--particularly when slammed publicly.
Welcher reminds me of my ex-husband. He is condescending, pompous, bossy af, talks over everyone else, and gaslights the hell out of you with everything he says.
As the new trial begins, I need to state the perhaps unpopular opinion that I believe Jennifer McCabe. Yes, I do. She called 911, and when asked how long John had been out on the front lawn, she said “a couple of hours.”
Thank you for your honesty, Jen.
As usual, Auntie Bev just wanted to take the chance to shit on Alan Jackson on national television. She was never going to do anything, but she wanted to remind the defense team that she's completely in the tank for the Commonwealth.
Absent collusion, conspiracy, or affirmative participation in a crime, you have to be an absolute piece of shit to call a dad to testify against his daughter.
It’s made worse by the fact they didn’t list him the first time. It’s a spite move. I’m ashamed to live in this state.