@redeemed_zoomer@ladies4pd Nobody says psychosis justifies murder. The issue is whether or not the person had the capacity to understand what they were doing. Someone who knows fully well what they are doing and commits murder should be punished differently than someone who does not have mental capacity.
Testimonies of young boys and girls whose lives were almost taken by evil. Equipping the Persecuted is giving food and medical aid to help these families as they navigate this difficult time. Please go to https://t.co/fcNLL7fq6M to help them today.
https://t.co/fcNLL7fq6M
#nigeria #mission #hospital #prayers #hope
He accomplished two important things with this line of questioning: 1) He exposed abortion for what it really is, stripping away the euphemisms that hide its barbarity, and 2) he revealed that abortion's proponents are too embarrassed and uncomfortable to have the conversation without the euphemisms because it makes them look monstrous. In other words, they care more about how they're perceived than anything else, including the wellbeing of innocent, defenseless babies. So they are, in fact, monstrous — and terrible at hiding it.
Very well done.
A number of these alleged fascist groups materialized for a single event and then disappeared without a trace during Trump's first term. It was always odd that nobody had heard of them beforehand.
I always thought the aesthetics were a bit too on the nose to be real.
Nigerian Christians bury their brothers and sisters martyred by Islamic ideology with songs of praise.
song Translation:
Jesus Jesus I love you
You are the only savior
Jesus Jesus I follow you
Today and forever
Candace Owens has repeatedly told her audience that Erika Kirk is a hybrid robot - “not human” - one of these supposed sentinel machines living among us, and that if you “STABBED THEM,” they wouldn’t bleed.
This is exactly the kind of dehumanizing, paranoid and psychotic rhetoric that can push people toward doing something truly dangerous.
Let me jump in here to answer this question.
Yes, the gospel is genuinely offered to all, yet Scripture does not require that Christ died with the same saving intent for every individual.
Scripture holds two truths together. First, the call to salvation is universal. God commands all people everywhere to repent, and all who come to Christ will be received. The offer is real, sincere, and without qualification.
Second, the work of Christ is effective and it actually secures the salvation of His people. Christ lays down His life for His sheep, and His death does not merely make salvation possible; it accomplishes it.
So the offer goes out freely to all, and anyone who believes will be saved. At the same time, those who come do so because God, in His grace, draws them. The difference is not in the sufficiency of Christ’s work, but in the saving purpose of God and the response of the human heart.
For those of you considering Orthodoxy
Just realize that once a year you will have to curse and anathematize all of your Protestant or Catholic relatives, friends, and neighbors… simply for disagreeing with the EO teaching.
The document is called the synodikon. Look it up
Nick Fuentes: Jewish people, although they appear to be white - when they’re accosted, they say, ‘I’m not white, I’m Jewish!’
VS.
Nick Fuentes, when confronted by a cop and challenged: I’m not white, I’m Mexican!
It’s not hard to figure out the Dale is wrong here but I expect I’ll hear his false claim restated over and over in coming months.
Just look up the word in the Gospel of John before making wild claims like this.
It's already happened. A great deal of people who were openly anti-Semitic ten years ago have moved back towards neutrality/peaceful coexistence with Zionists because anti-Zionism/anti-Semitism is now brown-coded and left-coded.
I'm one of them. I was notorious enough during the alt-right era to get defamed in an ADL profile. One of my old videos on the subject was cited in a Netflix special about "online hate" several years back which caused a bunch of people in the lit scene (several of whom I considered friends) to turn their backs on me. Genuinely surprised I never ended up on Canary Mission. What changed?
After 10/7, the anti-Semitic/anti-Zionist discourse was revealed to be a fig leaf for Marxism and anti-white hatred. The same people chanting "FREE PALESTINE" vote for Democrats, support DEI and mass immigration, and want to kill me for being white. The Israel/Palestine conflict is just an extension of their desire for a Rwanda-esque genocide, because they see Jews as white and Israel as a mini-America. Spare me your genetics charts "proving" that Jews aren't white. The left believes they're white and they've imposed this view as a reality that you must deal with.
Does that mean Israel is ARE GREATEST ALLY or there aren't problems with our relationship? Absolutely not. But when one side is aligned with you on some issues and the other wants you DEAD, it's obvious who your true enemies are. In the wake of Charlie Kirk's assassination, it wasn't people with Israeli flags calling for me to be next. It was Palestine supporters. This is a very basic friend/enemy distinction that large numbers of the right have failed.
Moreover, I'm tired of the easily debunked conspiracy theories about Jews. Crap like "Greater Israel." Ooooh, some minor Likud functionary talked about "Greater Israel." Clearly the war in Iran is about lebensraum for the Zionazis! Or fabricated quotes from the Talmud. Buddy, you've never read the Talmud. I've never read it. I'm not GONNA read it. If I wanted to experience a bunch of Jews arguing about minutia, I'd go to the Spring Valley Mall. At least there I can get lunch. Back in 2017, some guy on Facebook was demanding I unfriend Jews I was IRL friends with because "you're endangering your comrades." Yeah sure I'm gonna cut off actual friends who've always had my back to mollify some weirdo who'd stab me in the back.
Anti-Semitism is an affectation for brownoids and irony leftists who were afraid to say "retard" until the right made it edgy and cool. It's Sneako and Nick Fueñtes: gross, low-IQ brownoids that normal people find repulsive. And it always results in turning people into libtards. Fueñtes is now telling people to vote Democrat. The scattered remnants of the 2016 alt right were defending those losers in Minnesota who got shot by ICE because ICE are "ZOGbots." Vote for Zohran Mamdani so some homeless schizo can shove you in front of a train, all because we need to own the Jews. This level of mental illness needs a DSM entry.
I'm neither an anti-Semite or a philo-Semite. Israel is just another country to me, one that can (and does) help further American goals. It is not the axis on which the world turns and the Jews are not the Borg. You don't have to choose between Ben Shapiro and Nick Fueñtes. You can choose your own side. Mind-blowing concept to groypers, who basically have a George W. Bush view on the JQ: "if you're not with us, you're with the Zionists." I'm with America.
🚨 EXCLUSIVE — Tucker Carlson just said that Bibi Netanyahu's rhetoric is worse than Hitler's ever was.
This was two hours after the terrorist attack targeting the Detroit-area Jewish preschool.
Tucker said that Hitler hadn't "ever" called to "exterminate" the Jews.
Like with so much of what Tucker says these days, this is a sadly common theme in white nationalist and neo-Nazi circles.
In order to believe this insanity, let alone repeat it out loud, however, one would have to be intentionally ignorant of history.
Tucker somehow tops this, though, by fusing it together with a stunning level of Biblical illiteracy.
Pretending not to understand that Bibi Netanyahu's references to "Amalek" are simply a political ralling cry to define the Iranian Mullahs as determined enemies of Israel, Tucker claims Bibi is somehow calling for the murder of all Iranian civilians.
Never mind that Bibi Netanyahu and the vast majority of pro-Israel accounts on X have not only supported, but openly praised the brave Iranian people who have continued protesting the regime despite the 40K+ protesters murdered by the Mullahs.
But nothing compares to Tucker's glazing of Hitler.
In a January 1939 Reichstag speech, Hitler explicitly called for "the annihilation of the Jewish race in Europe."
Almost four years later, as the Holocaust was in full swing in November 1942, Hitler took a victory lap regarding his own "prophecy" from 1939.
In a speech in Munich commemorating the anniversary of his failed 1923 "Beer Hall Putsch," Hitler said:
"You will remember the Reichstag session at which I declared that if Jewry succeeded in bringing about a world war, the result would be the annihilation of Jewry in Euroape.
This prophecy is now being fulfilled.”
There is substantially more evidence, of course, not that it would matter to Tucker or others echoing this bizarre Hitler denialism.
Just as this evidence hasn't mattered to the legions of neo-Nazis and others who have parroted this exact claim for decades.
It was given the thinnest possible veneer of legitimacy from infamous Holocaust denier "historian" David Irving, a facade that long ago was shattered.
But in recent years, the falsehood that Hitler didn't call for exterminating the Jews has been peddled by the Institute for Historical Review, which is funded by Ron Unz of the Unz Review.
Perhaps not coincidentally, @buckleycarlson loves the Unz Review — as he discussed when interviewed by his brother Tucker.
In short, Tucker glazing Hitler was not some mistake or momentary spell of ignorance.
Just like when Tucker held up Bonhoeffer as a warning of the worst example people could choose to follow.
This is all part and parcel of who Tucker has become.