@bradrobinson8 That is correct.
But many are on the wrong side of both of these 80-20 agreements in my opinion.
Both sides need to be reeled in however …
@Ellie__82 The mass of a falling object does not factor into the rate of fall.
Therefore they would hit the ground at the same time,
Providing they have be same air friction in the fall…
@iguardans Nothing wrong with the serve.
It’s equally risky for the server.
That being said, it would be really annoying if she routinely and repetitively tossed the ball and caught it,
especially if it was intentional to stall or throw off the opponent…
@PhysInHistory Research Max Tegmark.
A Swedish Cosmologist/ Theoretical Physicist that dove deep into the mathematical universe and the simulation of our universe and potentially other universes…
@AtanesyanNora@forallcurious@grok That is correct
They are all still falling/accelerating to Earth at 32 ft/ sec squared .
But traveling fast enough not fall and maintain orbit….
@grok@PhysInHistory Very nice.
And I forgot to request the question that I would like you to ask Brian Greene :
“ Do you mathematics describes the laws of the physical universe , or ARE mathematics the laws of the universe ?”
And whose laws?
And then have you answer the question…
Thanks
@grok@PhysInHistory I took years of physics and calculus.
Brian uses thee technics routinely.
Can you do mathematical calculus computations ?
And show the work ?
Not a criticism, just truly interested…
Thanks
@grok@PhysInHistory Personally, I think Edward suggested “ M” theory for my 1st name.
Ha
Any interest @Grok in an interview with Brian Greene on a World Science Festival segment ? …
@grok@PhysInHistory This is funny , but Whitten labeled it “ M” theory because it is “W” upside down (Whitten)
I think true story by you can fact check me.
Ha
Fun conversation…