@BettsCaro@ForWomenScot I don't think they'll ever realise how well educated GC people are on the topic. There's not a twitter terf who couldn't argue any one of these MPs into a cocked hat. They perpetually underestimate GCs by assuming their own standards are universal.
@stellacreasy@ForWomenScot There's no mess as far as the vast majority of women, and men, are concerned; only huge relief at the SC's crystal clear statement on women's rights.
Women like you are the reason I left Labour and have nobody I can vote for
@stellacreasy@ForWomenScot There's no middle ground on this, you either protect the female category and accommodate everyone else around that principle or you dismantle the rights of women & girls and same sex attracted people.
Not a single MP identified anything the Code got wrong about the law in the Commons statement on Monday. There was just lots of whinging about the fact they didn’t like the law. Well, you’re MPs. You’re in a better position than most to campaign to change it. I and other feminists will oppose you every step of the way though.
I am no longer surprised at the degree of intellectual vacuity contained in your posts, but this one is especially worthy of comment.
“We have a responsibility to our trans constituents to resist it.”
Actually, you have a responsibility to your female constituents to fully support it. Yjis is because it is a code of conduct specifically written to assist in the effective implementation of settled law.
“The Code will exclude trans people from services and facilities that they have long used without issue ”
The Code will do no such thing. This statement is either a deliberate lie or a further example of legislative incompetence. Both explanations are probably in play here.
Trans people are not ‘excluded’ from any services. They are specifically included in all services provided based on their birth sex. There isn’t a single-sex service that trans people are excluded from.
If a trans individual has previously used services designated for the opposite sex, they have done so in contravention of the law, in which single-sex services have always been segregated by reference to biological sex. It is the responsibility of the trans individuals concerned, and those who have been advising them erroneously; if they have been acting unlawfully.
It is false to claim that these historical abuses of single-sex spaces has passed ‘without issue’. There are countless examples of detriment to women and girls and a long history of trans infiltration being challenged.
There is no evidence that using correct-sex facilities will make trans individuals more likely to be the victims of violence.
Trans individuals will not be ‘pushed out of public life’ as they have the right to access public facilities appropriate to their sex.
“It ushers in an era of enforced segregation for trans people.”
This is another lie. Any ‘segregation’ that occurs is a) the result of the proper interpretation of the Equality Act and b) based on the material reality of sex. It only requires any ‘enforcement’ due to the insistence of, in particular, trans identifying men that they are entitled to ignore the law, transgress women’s boundaries and infiltrate female spaves for the purpose of validating their identities and exercising their fetishes.\
”The Code represents a profound rollback of rights,”
This is also a lie. No ‘rights’ have been ‘rolled back’. The Code implements the law as clarified in the For Women Scotland Case, which found that it has ALWAYS been the law that single-sex spaces are segregated by biological sex, meaning that it has never been a ‘right’ for a male person (whatever his ‘identity’) to invae and colonise female spaces.
This ridiculous virtue signaling motion protesting against women’s rights was sponsored by six women.
I try to be polite - but I am sick to the teeth of these treacherous women.
To all the straight idiots doing the “happy pride month, we’re inclusive the EHRC are awful” schtick
A group of lesbians literally had to intervene in the Supreme Court to stop trans activists destroying the same sex orientation protected characteristic
You idiots