Janine 🚜

Supports the farmers, no farms no food. Will never eat bugs.

[Janine 🚜 @MullinerJanine]

@julesserkin @theprepperguy @GOVUK Hi Jules, I live in Northern Ireland now and I purchase Organic German flour from a local organic farm shop where we also get our raw milk. Maybe try the Polish grocery shop. The Good food project have a supplier of unfortified flour you can order online. Check them out.

[Glenn Meder @GlennMeder]

12/ Not enough people are talking about this.

Age verification laws are passing in state after state right now. The infrastructure to end anonymity forever is being built while most people are not paying attention.

We have to wake people up. Fast.

Share this thread. Show people what happens when anonymous speech dies. Make them see what their children will inherit if we do not stop this now.

Follow me for the warning. For the context that makes you see what is being built. For the alarm bell that will not stop ringing until this threat is understood.

The window is still open. But it will not stay open much longer.

Preserve Liberty by Preserving Privacy.

[Adam Wren @aswren]

£350k, the cost per asylum seeker is the entire lifetime tax of the median taxpayer.

Each boat that arrives wipes out the contributions of an entire street of people

[Adam Brooks AKA EssexPR 🇬🇧 @EssexPR]

NO !!!!
This is what Tony Blair has been trying to force for 20 years.
Digital I.D is one step closer to communist China, say something bad online, you don’t get benefits or access to travel.

NO TO DIGITAL I.D - @Togetherdec

[Zia Yusuf @ZiaYusufUK]

NO to digital ID.

[Together @Togetherdec]

👉 Why A Compulsory Digital ID Card Is Nothing Like Your Passport - And Far More Dangerous

Keir Starmer & the UK government are trying to present digital ID cards like they're just "modernized" versions of a passport or driving licence. But they’re not - they’re far more risky. Here are 5 reasons why:

👉 1. Passports & driving licences are fixed records - a digital ID could track your every move

Passports/Licences: Your UK passport or driving licence is just a piece of paper or plastic with your name, photo, and date of birth. It doesn’t follow you around or update itself.

Digital ID: A state-controlled, compulsory digital ID card would almost certainly connect to government databases. Every time you use it - for example at a shop, GP surgery, or online - it could record where you were, when, and what you did. For example, India’s Aadhaar digital ID logs when people use it for things like banking or benefits, creating a trail of their lives. A compulsory digital ID card could track your daily activities in a way passports never could.

👉 2. Passports & driving licences have specific uses - a digital ID could control your whole life

Passports/Licences: You use your passport to travel abroad or your driving licence to drive. That’s about it - they’re not needed for everyday tasks.

Digital ID: A compulsory UK digital ID could become required for opening a bank account, renting property, getting healthcare, or even getting online or accessing venues. Imagine needing it to log into online services or prove your identity at work. In Estonia, their digital ID is used for banking, taxes, and more. If the UK makes a digital ID the key to everything, you might not be able to live normally without it. Think of the millions of people who already struggle with tech. Only a few short years ago in Covid, we saw how digital ID “passes” were used to restrict your access to society for the “wrong” behaviour.

👉 3. Passports & driving licences can’t be mass-tracked - a digital ID makes surveillance simple

Passports/Licences: Your passport gets checked at the airport, or a police officer looks at your licence. The government can’t instantly see everywhere you’ve been.

Digital ID: A digital ID tied to a database could let the government - or hackers, fraudsters, stalkers or other criminals - check your movements, purchases, or even who you meet, all in seconds. In China, digital IDs are linked into a wider patchwork of surveillance systems. Travel, spending, and even online activity can be monitored and used in various local or national “social credit” schemes, which punish or restrict people for rule-breaking. No-one should want the UK allowing a similar system of surveillance and control to develop.

👉 4. Losing a passport or driving licence isn’t catastrophic - but a digital ID breach could expose everything

Passports/Licences: If you lose your UK passport or driving licence, you report it, get a new one, and move on. No one learns your medical history or bank details.

Digital ID: If a UK digital ID database gets hacked, it could potentially leak your NHS records, benefit claims, travel history, or more. Journalists reportedly bought admin access to India’s Aadhaar digital ID database on the black market - for about £6! Personal data from millions was exposed: names, ID numbers, even bank accounts. A UK system could hold just as much sensitive information, and you can’t simply “replace” your entire life’s data if it’s stolen. And the UK state has shown time and again it cannot keep data safe - the Afghan data breach scandal is only the most recent example.

👉 5. Passports & driving licences are offline - a digital ID lives online

Passports/Licences: Your passport or licence sits in your wallet, unconnected to anything until you show it.

Digital ID: A UK digital ID would likely work online or on your phone, sending your data across networks every time you use it. Even if it works offline, it might sync data later. This constant connection makes it easier for someone to track or steal your information, unlike a passport that stays in your pocket.

👉 In short:

👉 Your UK passport or driving licence is a bit like a library card - you use it for one specific job, then put it away.

👉 Compulsory digital ID cards could be like a GPS tracker on your life, recording and linking everything you do.

👉 With powerful modern technology, the risks aren’t just bigger than a passport - they’re on a completely different scale…

...and far greater even than the last time Tony Blair tried to impose compulsory ID cards, scrapped in 2010 at a cost of up to £20bn to the taxpayer.

[Queen Bee @KingBobIIV]

Like I refused the masks, the lockdowns, the floor arrows, the sanitiser - I will refuse digital ID.

Learn from Covid. Do not be a coward. Do not use self service tills, or shops that scan your face. I refuse to be punished, and have my freedoms taken from me, because the government have deliberately created an immigration catastrophe, that they seek to "solve" by removing my freedoms.

If I have to starve, so be it. I am prepared to die on this hill, because life isnt worth living under their dystopian nightmare.

If there is any hope, it lies with the Proles.

We are many. They are few.
Refuse to comply.

[leilani dowding 🌸🚜 ☮️ @LeilaniDowding]

Digital ID that goes on your phone is insane! The amount of phone theft and phone hacking that goes on is out of control!!

I will NEVER CONSENT

What a lie this about boats, that’s easy to stop

They will lie and say it’s about crime. That’s easy to stop if you actually punish criminals

They said it with Covid and we Said NO

[Ros Maidment @MaidmentRos]

Starmer planning mandatory digital ID. It’s invasive & irrelevant to illegal migrants. Right now it's just an idea - we need to stop it becoming a reality. Join me and sign the petition now! https://t.co/w0Xbs72J6H via @38degrees

[Wide Awake Media @wideawake_media]

Yesterday, I had an absolutely MIND-BLOWING conversation with ChatGPT.

To my amazement, it exposed—in unnervingly precise detail—the technocratic agenda to enslave humanity, how all the different pieces fit together, and why it's essential that we put a stop to it.

THREAD 🧵

[Korvet @ Reform @reggkain]

@UkandNireland @AllisonPearson @YvetteCooperMP https://t.co/U0ze7KSc5I

Please sign & share this petition & make doorstep deliveries to our most vulnerable people safer. To get a DBS you need 5 yrs address history. If this was law it would remove the Blackmarket & illegals from the industry Sign & Share force Starmer to act!

[Bernie @Artemisfornow]

Oh BRILLIANT … it’s another cringingly embarrassing outing by London’s deputy mayor.

Another outstanding performance being questioned about the decision to CLOSE manned front desks in police stations in London as crime figures rocket.

Yes, seriously she’s that important 🤡

[James Melville 🚜 @JamesMelville]

He absolutely nails it. 🎯

“We end up with economically illiterate people in the government. There are not fit for office. This is our money. And I’m sick of being asked to pay more and more for less and less.”

[Queen Bee @KingBobIIV]

HOW DARE you and your party have the audacity to claim YOU know how to keep OUR children safe better than we do? Who the literal hell do you lot think you are? You and you colleagues and your boss, downgraded the online sexual exploitation of children to non custodial sentences, you and your grifting pedo enabling friends ignored, facilitated and were complicit in the mass rape of tens of thousands of little girls up and down the country, for decades, you and your pervy pedo Labour pals, have sent countless thousands of gay and autistic children through the trans meatgrinder to be medicated and sterilised, your pals oversaw Jimmy Saville never facing consequences for his perversions, and now you tell US parents, that YOU care more about OUR children than we do?

You make me spit. Absolutely disgusting. When PARENTS in this country were absolutely distraught, and overcome with grief after three beautiful little girls were murdered in Southport, your response was to lock them up. When little children were blown up at Manchester Arena, you told us not to look back in anger. YOU and your mates have deliberately and willfully flooded this country wirh aggressive, angry, sex starved men, who are literally raping and pillaging their way through every town and city, and you answer is to lock US up for being pissed off about on social media?

HOW DARE ALL OF YOU profess to care about OUR children more than we do. Who the HELL do you think you all are?

[Basil the Great @BasilTheGreat]

If you haven't signed the petition.

Do so now.

https://t.co/xwkMMWxqyz

[Basil the Great @BasilTheGreat]

🚨THE PETITION TO REPEAL THE ONLINE SAFETY ACT IS NOW AT 350,000 SIGNATURES

Will the Labour Government listen to the people?

[Michael O'Deira @rogue_male1]

🎯 The Police have a duty to serve the British people. This was established long ago in 1829. Here they are. What becomes immediately apparent is how those principles have been abused and are trodden down by the criminal-state-sponsored jackboot.

"The 9 Principles of Policing were, apparently, established by Robert Peel and his associates back in 1829, with the “General Instructions” being issued to each constable. The policing principles were expanded, as below, in the 1948 book,  A Short History of the British Police by Charles Reith.

1. To prevent crime and disorder, as an alternative to their repression by military force and severity of legal punishment.

2. To recognise always that the power of the police to fulfil their functions and duties is dependent on public approval of their existence, actions and behaviour, and on their ability to secure and maintain public respect.

3. To recognise always that to secure and maintain the respect and approval of the public means also the securing of the willing co-operation of the public in the task of securing observance of laws.

4. To recognise always that the extent to which the co-operation of the public can be secured diminishes proportionately the necessity of the use of physical force and compulsion for achieving police objectives.

5. To seek and preserve public favour, not by pandering to public opinion, but by constantly demonstrating absolutely impartial service to law, in complete independence of policy, and without regard to the justice or injustice of the substance of individual laws, by ready offering of individual service and friendship to all members of the public without regard to their wealth or social standing, by ready exercise of courtesy and friendly good humour, and by ready offering of individual sacrifice in protecting and preserving life.

6. To use physical force only when the exercise of persuasion, advice and warning is found to be insufficient to obtain public co-operation to an extent necessary to secure observance of law or to restore order, and to use only the minimum degree of physical force which is necessary on any particular occasion for achieving a police objective.

7. To maintain at all times a relationship with the public that gives reality to the historic tradition that the police are the public and that the public are the police, the police being only members of the public who are paid to give full-time attention to duties which are incumbent on every citizen in the interests of community welfare and existence.

8. To recognise always the need for strict adherence to police-executive functions, and to refrain from even seeming to usurp the powers of the judiciary of avenging individuals or the State, and of authoritatively judging guilt and punishing the guilty.

9. To recognise always that the test of police efficiency is the absence of crime and disorder, and not the visible evidence of police action in dealing with them."

Full article here: https://t.co/EHQbL9413i

[Merseyside Police @MerseyPolice]

Earlier, Assistant Chief Constable Jenny Sims and Chief Crown Prosecutor Sarah Hammond spoke at a press conference to provide an update on Monday’s incident on Water Street in Liverpool.

Paul Desmond Sanders Doyle, 53 years, of Burghill Road, West Derby has this afternoon been charged with two counts of unlawful and malicious wounding with intent to cause grievous bodily harm; two counts of causing unlawful and malicious grievous bodily harm with intent to cause grievous bodily harm; two counts of attempted unlawful and malicious grievous bodily harm with intent to cause grievous bodily harm, all contrary to Section 18 of the Offences Against the Person Act 1861. He has been charged with one count of dangerous driving contrary to Section 2 of the Road Traffic Act 1988.

Doyle has been remanded into custody and will appear at Liverpool Magistrates Court in the morning.

This continues to be a large and complex investigation and detectives are reviewing a huge volume of CCTV and mobile phone footage submitted by the public and businesses, as well as footage from our own body worn cameras and dashcams.

As always, our thoughts remain with victims and everyone impacted.

You can read the full transcripts from the press conference via the ‘news’ section our website here ➡️ https://t.co/8EKBEJisEL

[The Vigilant Fox 🦊 @VigilantFox]

Trump just played his ace card.

The media spent years covering up the targeted killings of White farmers in South Africa——because it didn't fit their narrative.

He confronted the issue head-on beside President Ramaphosa, under the bright lights of live TV.

What happened next left the press scrambling for cover.

🧵 THREAD

[God Save Great Britain @GSGB01]

🚨BREAKING: A petition has been set up to grant the vote for London mayor to ALL UK residents.

This would HUGELY increase @antmiddleton's chance of being elected.

Please sign and share far and wide⬇️