@StevePalazzolo_ The old + - grades made so much more sense than 0-100. Easier to explain/defend too. Also unrelated but never made sense to me that 60 is the default average instead of 50 if we’re going off of a 0-100 scale
Counter point, it was never supposed to be treated as the “end all be all” in evaluating players, they themselves will say that, but rather a context based metric.
The article was fair and logical, Caleb played well and his PFF grade makes sense given the reasoning they gave
PFF tried to explain why Caleb Williams’ Week 1 grade is so low, but we’re not buying it. They expect us to believe that he didn’t have a single play worth a +1.5 all afternoon? And no mention of his elite scrambling?
JJ Watt was right when he went on that rant about PFF grades a couple years ago on the Pat McAfee show. It’s a deeply flawed system that should not be treated as the end all and the be all of evaluating NFL players.
https://t.co/4KLNIh5FDH