@daily_wire_fan @BoringLegalNerd Seems so? I don’t know if they’ve developed informal rules on it or not (certainly no formal ones), but I’m sure a majority can do really anything at all.
@daily_wire_fan @BoringLegalNerd Hasn’t happened. The Court has issued its own administrative stay when the Circuit Justice refused to do so, but that happened for the first time in May - to Justice Alito.
@Vibutler_@Micah_Escobedo The only thing the Chief seemed to care about was if “what if it went beyond talking” and he was assured that would be a different case multiple times
SUMMARY OF H-1B EXECUTIVE ORDER
- ENTRY BAN: No H-1B visa holder may enter the United States beginning Sunday September 21st, including current visa holders, unles they pay $100K to enter.
- VISA FEE: New H-1B and H-1B extensions must pay 100K to be processed and 100K per year every year thereafter to maintain them.
This will effectively end the H-1B program completely. No one, even the highest paid at 500K will be paying an extra 100K a year to the government.
It will destroy the health care, higher education, and technology sectors as we know them if this isn't struck down in court.
I haven't been as critical of Noem v. Vasquez Perdomo as some (and have agreed with a lot of what @OrinKerr and @RichardMRe have written) but the latest @steve_vladeck post makes some really powerful points. E.g.:
@neocasarvatism@ch_rvn But, in that scenario:
Heterosexual couples have Option A and Option B to get married.
Homosexual couples have Option B to get married.
@neocasarvatism@ch_rvn If it’s a different system, how does that abide Obergefell’s command that marriage licenses be provided on the same terms and conditions as opposite sex couples?
@neocasarvatism@ch_rvn I mean, it seems like there would automatically be all sorts of questions that would need to be dealt with. Like if they don’t have the technology to do that for some reason.
@neocasarvatism@ch_rvn What if it’s a rural area and there’s only a few people all of whom have alleged objections?
Seems like an unacceptable patchwork that courts would have to start policing.