ERIKA. ANDREW. BLAKE
TEN MONTHS AFTER CHARLIE KIRK’S MURDER, CAN ANY OF YOU NAME A SINGLE SIGNIFICANT LEAD YOU HAVE PUBLICLY DEMANDED BE INDEPENDENTLY INVESTIGATED—RATHER THAN SIMPLY ASSEMBLING PEOPLE TO CONTRADICT, DISCREDIT, OR SUPPRESS THE EVIDENCE AND QUESTIONS RAISED BY CANDACE OWENS?
Erika has met with Candace. She knows what has been uncovered. Yet she has not publicly pursued a single independent lead that challenges the official narrative. That is not merely difficult to reconcile with a grieving wife’s determination to discover who murdered her husband. It appears to be the direct opposite of it.
Why should the public believe that your work since Charlie’s death has been about honoring his memory when you have completely abandoned the positions he expressed near the end of his life concerning Israel and the influence of major Jewish donors?
And why should anyone believe that you have genuinely pursued justice by seeking everyone responsible for his murder, when your visible effort has been directed instead toward sealing an official narrative built on weak and inconclusive evidence?
From the outside, this looks far less like a search for truth than an effort to protect your positions, preserve the flow of money, and transform Charlie’s organization into the very reverse of what he stood for before his death.
If that judgment is wrong, destroy it with one fact: name one serious thing you have done to uncover the whole truth—other than silence, discredit, or attack the people still searching for it.
@MrsErikaKirk@AndrewKolvet@BlakeSNeff@TPUSA@JackPosobiec@megynkelly@RealCandaceO@baroncoleman@TuckerCarlson@JohnMappin@ImMappin@RealAlexJones@IanCarrollShow@jimmy_dore@DonaldJTrumpJr@TimJDillon@OwenBenjamin@LionelMedia@realDonaldTrump@JDVance@joekent16jan19
#CharlieKirk #JusticeForCharlieKirk #CharlieKirkMurder #CharlieKirkInvestigation #JusticeForCharlie #TPUSA #TurningPointUSA #CandaceOwens #ErikaKirk #TylerRobinson #Israel #MiriamAdelson #FollowTheEvidence #DueProcess #TruthMatters
I don't understand how we let "buying a house" turn into a 30 year debt sentence that requires two incomes, perfect credit, and a small miracle. Our grandparents did this on a single factory wage with a handshake. We need a PhD and three co-signers.
men are so convinced they suffer in silence meanwhile it's actually everybody around them that bears the brunt of their emotions. it almost always visibly reflects on how they treat people
I read somewhere that "When you choose a life partner you're choosing your eating companion for about 20,000 meals, your travel companion for about 70 vacations, your retirement friend, career therapist, & someone whose day you'll hear about 18,000 times" and I really can't stress this enough.
Zohran Mamdani says his wife, Rama Duwaji, won't take on a formal First Lady role, emphasizing that her focus is her own career as an artist. He added that she "deserves to be known in her own right" rather than through his political office.
Europe spent 400 years using slave labour in colonies to build its wealth, rebranded this extraction model in the 20th century and somehow its citizens still believe their social conditions are a result of some superior intellect rather than inhuman violence.
Andrew
Let me offer advice.
Experienced investigators pay close attention not only to what a person says, but to what they avoid, what provokes disproportionate anger, and where they repeatedly try to redirect attention.
When someone confronted with factual questions responds by attacking the questioner’s character, motives, sanity and reputation, that behavior does not make the questions disappear. It makes investigators more interested in why those questions produce such an extreme reaction.
Your response is not the language of a man calmly confident that the evidence supports him. It is the language of someone desperate to control the frame: Charlie’s death must be discussed only on your terms, Tyler Robinson must be accepted as the killer, alternative explanations must be ridiculed rather than examined, and anyone who refuses to comply must be publicly destroyed.
That is not a rebuttal. It is containment.
Candace has been conducting what every genuine investigation requires: collecting testimony, crowdsourcing information, following leads, testing theories and discarding those that fail. Some leads will inevitably reach dead ends. That is not proof of dishonesty; it is the nature of investigation. What matters is whether substantial questions remain unanswered—and they do.
Yet instead of answering those questions with evidence, you substitute moral outrage, mockery and character assassination. You invoke Charlie, Erika and the children as emotional shields, as though grief grants you exclusive authority over the facts or makes scrutiny immoral. It does not.
You claim Candace lacks proof while demanding that everyone accept Tyler Robinson’s guilt despite evidence that remains weak, contested and inconclusive. You therefore apply one standard to Candace and another to the official narrative: absolute proof is required before she may ask questions, but certainty is demanded from the public before the case itself has established it.
That contradiction is becoming impossible to miss.
So here is the advice an experienced interrogator might give you: stop attacking the person asking the questions and start answering the questions themselves. Stop repeating certainty where certainty has not been earned. Stop behaving as though investigation is a threat.
Because every time you respond to evidence with sarcasm or moral outrage, to questions with insults, and to uncertainty with enforced certainty, you do not make Candace look less credible.
You make yourself look more concerned about where the investigation may lead.
@RealCandaceO@baroncoleman@JohnMappin@ImMappin@joekent16jan19@TRobinsonNewEra@LionelMedia@IanCarrollShow@AwakenWithJP@jimmy_dore@OwenBenjamin@leahfiles@realstewpeters@EstulinVz@RealAlexJones@HarrisonHSmith@BlakeSNeff@TPUSA@DonaldJTrumpJr
#TylerRobinson #CharlieKirk #TPUSA #Israel
It has been incredibly satisfying to see the US and Israel find out in real time that you can't just bully the whole world, and especially not a 6000 year old nation that has been largely isolated by sanctions and learned to support itself, and does not give up.
That one of the great tragedies of life is the paradox of wisdom and age. As you become wiser about life and the world, you have less time to apply it yourselt. So you try to pass it down, but some things just can't be heard in youth. It only comes through the experience of living. And then the cycle repeats: you remember that someone tried to give you some gems and you didn't listen, so you try to do the same. It's a somewhat cruel time loop of sorts, and I ponder over the design sometimes.
Get over being called a nigger. Get over slavery. Get over Jim Crow era lynchings. Get over redlined communities and modern housing discrimination. Get over mass incarceration, police brutality. Get over medical and environmental racism. White people, you have a lot of nerve
I’ve never seen people advocate for disabled people as much as when it’s defending and explaining someone saying the N word.
People aren’t being ableist towards one man for saying it, they’re questioning a culture that always has a justification for anti-Blackness.
So my takeaways are,
1. If we have a disability we don’t have to apologize when we harm people.
2. You can’t be racist if you have a disability.
3. As a Black person I should have an unlimited capacity of empathy, grace and understanding while receiving none.
4. Impact of our actions don’t matter as long as that wasn’t our intention.
Did I miss anything?
Overcommunication works because your manager’s biggest fear is being surprised by your failure in front of their boss.
Every “just keeping you posted” message does the same thing: it transfers risk. When you update your manager, you’re giving them time to course-correct, pre-spin the narrative, or escalate before it becomes a crisis they own.
The people who get managed out are almost always the ones whose managers had to explain problems they didn’t see coming. That’s what triggers the “I don’t trust this person” instinct. Surprise, not incompetence.
And here’s what most people miss about overcommunication: it also shapes how your manager talks about you in rooms you’re not in. If they always have fresh context on your work, you show up in talent reviews, resourcing conversations, promo discussions. If they don’t, you’re just a name on a spreadsheet.
The real hack is making your manager feel like they’ll never be caught off guard because of you. That feeling compounds into trust, which compounds into opportunity.