@noahsarkscans AiG - not Noah's Ark, ICR - not Noah's Ark, CMI - not Noah's Ark. If you can't convince those that accept the history of Noah there is no reason to take this seriously.
@TheDavidRives Well, except your example has 0 fish in it. Those are all cephalopods and I would put some decent odds on the plate being fake as well. Belemnites are frequently found in large groupings as the result of mass death or from vomitting sharks.
@ApoloJedi_@Conserberal No need to overcome any math. The 85% number is a different formula. If we use that same formula you and I may only be 90% the same and two gorillas may only be 85% the same. You and CMI never grapple with what that means. Are you and I different species?
@creationtoday Must we really be ignorant of the exceptional circumstances of the Antarctic ocean and dating of organisms that feed on its bounty. Nothing absurd about these results if you have done any reading.
@OklaInspector Hi Corey, I'm a follower of Dr. Carter and have watched almost all of his videos. Not sure I've directly responded to any of these but have talked Neaderthals quite a bit. Carters videos are some of the best by creationists.
@NickCaminoWKYC This Guardian pitching is insane! BTW, even the top wild card spot is now in play though it they win enough to get that, they also win the central so that would be moot.
Check out the view from up here! As the Curiosity rover continues to climb the flanks of Mt. Sharp, it has captured an extraordinarily clear panorama of Gale Crater's rim...and even the lands beyond. Details:
https://t.co/Zv9gQzybLO
Was driving past Mono Lake at sunset a week ago and just jumped out and quickly snapped this shot. When I looked at it later I was struck by how much it looks like a painting rather than a photo.
@jb_61820@StephenCMeyer Except the 1% isn't a myth but rather a particular form of measurement. The 1% is still 1% using that form of measurement and its the way its measured that has changed.