#WeekendProject recreating @undertheraedar's 'UK Deprivation' #dataviz with updated election results in #rstats
It's such awesome graphic and nobody should underestimate the effort it takes to work with UK geopolitical data!
Code and full graphic, here: https://t.co/jyuyWgJpEK
@DrChalton 'Margins are for printing bleed', yeah right! That's a myth conjured up by the international notetaking community (probably lizards - the good ones) to systematise and industrialise note-space in books.
I am wrong.
Anyone - absolutely anyone - that says economic growth is “easy” or should always be given primacy should be blocked immediately.
The market is not an end in itself.
Would the rich pay more in tax if public opinion decided?
My new article "Taxing the 1 per cent: Public Opinion vs Public Policy" is now available in FirstView at @BJPolS.
(https://t.co/iw3XSmBtD6).
Here's a thread 🧵 on the main findings
WSJ investment tip. Short companies cutting WFH and long companies increasing WFH. Managers that see growth slowing care less about attrition so cut WFH, managers that see growth picking up need to hire so expand WFH.
https://t.co/E7BwcQ1d9i
@JackTShaw Where are those figures from Jack? Recently the ‘i’ reported:
“The biggest increase is in London where rents are up £230 a month (13.4%), followed by Edinburgh at an increase of £140 a month (13.7%).”
https://t.co/ALx6L7UNbL
Do I know any survey design pros who would be prepared to take a look at a draft of something?
This is to help test our qualitative findings from interviews w/ 50 civil servants against a wider sample.
@DavidVeevers1 Dani Rodrik cites it from Oded Galor and Andrew Mountfield’s ‘Trading productivity for productivity: theory and evidence’ (2008)… and it’s everything you’d expect it is.
Give me the confidence of an economist trying to explain the diverging growth of countries through colonialism as “commodity-exporting countries gave up productivity in exchange for population” (2008, not even that long ago!)
Leave colonial history to @DavidVeevers1 👀
@jburnmurdoch Isn’t that because higher tax take allows greater investment and therefore better infrastructure, though - instead of a direct mechanism from individual wealth.
@watling_samuel@DavidHenigUK@lmrwanda@tc1415 I think a lot of people read this (very good) piece and find ways to turn it to their preconception rather than engage with it on its own terms.