@gregisenberg Muse - free
Grok Bot - Cursor Pro ($20)
Dots - Pro subscription ($100)
In terms of capturing market share, Muse wins hands down. My mom ain’t getting a Cursor Pro or ChatGPT Pro sub.
Remember the guy who hacked his gym using AI, Andrew Bird?
Well, I did a little OSINT, and it turns out he is the Conference Co-Director of Effective Altruism Global since 2015.
Isn't it interesting that every major "AI" hack has been made by people directly connected to Effective Altruism?
@yacineMTB Muse was better with its execution. Highly accessible (free), just as capable, and generous usage limit. The personal agent race is getting good. Looks like ChatGPT is next.
@Apple’s Siri vs @Muse. I had high hopes for Siri after watching the recent Apple Event, but it can’t even edit certain fields on its own system (1st screenshot). Meanwhile, Muse just gets it done (see other screenshots).
@Apple’s Siri vs @Muse. I had high hopes for Siri after watching the recent Apple Event, but it can’t even edit certain fields on its own system (1st screenshot). Meanwhile, Muse just gets it done (see other screenshots).
Hey Parker, love that the team’s iterating on Grok Bot voice. Biggest ask: move beyond turn-based voice toward something closer to GPT‑Live‑1’s full duplex.
Today (most assistants, and Grok Bot voice as I’ve used it) feels like walkie-talkie: I talk → silence → you talk → I wait. That works for dictation / brief Q&A, but it doesn’t feel like a teammate on a call.
What GPT‑Live‑1 does differently that I’m craving in Grok Bot:
1. Full duplex: it can listen while speaking. I can interrupt or add a detail mid-answer without killing the turn.
2. Backchannel acknowledgments (huge): short “uh-huh / yeah / mm-hmm” or emotional cues like a chuckle/gasp while I’m still talking, which makes the convo feel organic and present instead of frozen until the end of my sentence.
3. Organic pacing: it doesn’t only dump a paragraph after I stop; it can stay in the conversation while work continues in the background (the Live‑1 pattern of voice front-end + agent backend).
Grok’s strength for me is already there on the agent side (thorough, model choice for research/reasoning, bots that actually do work). What’s missing is the voice shell: natural overlap, interruptions, and those little acknowledgments that make it feel like a real call with @bot not a polished voicemail loop.
If Grok Bot voice got that duplex + backchannel layer on top of the existing bots/tools, that’d be a huge game-changer for how I use it day to day.
🚨 TREASURY SECRETARY BESSENT JUST NUKED ANTHROPIC & OPENAI’S “ROGUE AI” IMMUNITY SCAM ON LIVE TV
"A sitting employee came out, said there's a 10% chance of an extinction level event. But then the labs also said, take the liability off of our hands. And we will NOT do that.
The Hugging Face incident is the responsibility of OpenAI management, NOT a bunch of agents.
It is humans who are responsible, not the AI.
These labs need to take responsibility for themselves. They can slow down any time they want to."
CHECKED.