Voting in favour/against proposals is a very meh form of Governance.
This is a highly volatile situation, so something more like the @NegationGame that allows people to debate, learn, and come up with new ideas (while rewarding intellectual honesty) makes a lot of sense to me.
Cc @connormcmk
In a world where we use discourse less, I'm hopeful that a tool such as @NegationGame can potentially be an alternative. Any other ideas?
There's also a shielded/private voting element that would be beneficial too (assuming ones sticks with a voting based model).
I voted For Scroll DAO Constitution https://t.co/ggtPt5FbEV
We should pass this proposal, I would like to see the process in which this can change. This is my negation game process. https://t.co/dgrpCLsYBa
One of our guiding principles is breaking the link between ideas and tribes, empowering people to engage with ideas based on merit alone—free from the biases of who endorses them.
Love tracking live science debates by ppl I respect on here.
A bit underwhelming when they talk past each other, though... but I blame the medium.
No space for engaging with tangents, and no time to go past the first few replies.
It's been 10 years since Vitalk last posted about futarchy
odds on infoFi's success just shot up
@Polymarket's efforts this election have forcibly shunted the overton window in favor of infoFi
and the cost of experimenting in this field has never been lower
it's now or never
@VitalikButerin That's what we're building in the @NegationGame: a market for defensible ideas.
Think SchellingCoin on a graph of ideas (nodes) and negations (edges): the Schelling point is how defensible you think the idea is.
Would love to get your eyes on it
lifehack you dont have to have "beliefs" you can just make stuff up anytime anyone asks for your opinion
theyll never be able to prove youre rendering on the fly but many will try anyway, and thats fun too
Support the Negation Game now and get to brag about being an early supporter. We could give you an in-game badge for it (if you hold us to that 🫥)
Contribute now on @gitcoin GG22!
Link in replies
👇
This question could eventually be a good benchmark of how well we're doing in the Negation Game. We're trying to be biased towards being open to change