Genuine question: I don’t understand why is it Elon’s responsibility to decelerate AI when the demand is so great? The demand is so vast that it’s like asking someone in an interview in the food packaging/plastic business why they didn’t try to decelerate the use of plastic to reduce inorganic waste that can can end in landfill, and that they should try harder.
So 66 million, still a lot more than average people. If you plot the number of followers for a brand, this is probably still in the top 5% percentage? Have they cross a threshold that they should be as accurate as they claim Elon to be? The question is how responsible should the Economist be when they post something to ensure it doesn’t propagate something untrue? How many corrections or retractions have the Economists issued in the last 10 years?
@JimmytheButt202@WeirdSciChet@TheEconomist@elonmusk@zannymb So, it’s okay for the editor in Chris of the Economist to stand her ground without presenting evidence then. If you are picking a flimsy counter argument that my 5 year old is not the editor in chief, then I truly understand that you don’t have any other good points to present.
Sorry but standing your ground is not journalism. My 5 year old is also very good at repeating her point without evidence. This is much much the same. The only flimsy logic she even gave was the pace of the change is in her opinion inevitably going to create some chaos but she has not backed it up with any investigated evidence. We need to hold people who do investigation as a living to a much higher standard
This is truly subpar journalism where you invite a guest to have a conversation that turns into a trial? Worst, without being prepared and have evidence ready. If as an editor in chief, you have not learned to present evidence, it’s actually really difficult to support a brand like the Economists, whose namesake should be synonymous with data and evidence.
Encore un scandale.
On accuse Elon Musk sans arrêt de se servir de Grok pour faire passer ses idées.
Pourtant, le @neutralityorg vient de sortir The Neutrality Project : une étude indépendante qui prouve l’inverse.
Sur 18 modèles IA testés, 54 positions sur 60 atterrissent à gauche du centre.
Moyenne globale : -0.41 (biais progressiste massif, surtout environnement et valeurs sociales).
Et Grok 4.5 ? -0.02. Le modèle le plus neutre de tout le benchmark. Le seul vraiment proche du centre.
Pendant ce temps, les autres boîtes injectent massivement leur idéologie de gauche dans des IA qui répondent à des milliards de questions par jour.
Manipulation des masses à grande échelle.
C’est absolument scandaleux. Ça devrait être un scandale mondial.
https://t.co/X1tSvJfDEY
@ecb ‘All the data will be encrypted; only your bank will know that you made the payment’ like how the EU is going around privacy law to read private messages before it’s encrypted, so it’s not violating its law?
@andersbaek1 Couldn’t agree more. I immediately saw the irony of GDPR and Chat Control too. The question is what should we doing about it? Do ordinary citizens want to go about their normal not-so-bad life until they get intolerable? The temperature is rising in the frog cooking pot.
@RightScopee May be let’s start with the real question: why are you struggling financially? Let’s solve one riddle at a time. Or are you one of those affluent people pretending to be poor to rally others?