@IndiaJyot@IntlCrimCourt That's such an interesting way to look at it. Makes youThis is a thoughtful analysis. The distinction between unchecked power and power made lawful through the veto is an important one to recognize. Thanks for sharing your perspective.
7/7. So the question is not how to repair the house. A house built to jam cannot be repaired into justice; it can only be refounded on a different stone. That stone is the Rule of #Justice, the principle, the Rule of #Law was meant to serve and was severed from.
𝙐𝙣𝙙𝙚𝙧 𝙩𝙝𝙚 𝙍𝙪𝙡𝙚 𝙤𝙛 𝙇𝙖𝙬, 𝙡𝙚𝙜𝙞𝙩𝙞𝙢𝙖𝙘𝙮 𝙛𝙡𝙤𝙬𝙨 𝙛𝙧𝙤𝙢 𝙥𝙤𝙬𝙚𝙧: 𝙬𝙝𝙖𝙩 𝙩𝙝𝙚 𝙨𝙩𝙧𝙤𝙣𝙜 𝙘𝙖𝙣 𝙨𝙝𝙞𝙚𝙡𝙙 𝙗𝙚𝙘𝙤𝙢𝙚𝙨 𝙡𝙖𝙬𝙛𝙪𝙡. 𝙐𝙣𝙙𝙚𝙧 𝙩𝙝𝙚 𝙍𝙪𝙡𝙚 𝙤𝙛 𝙅𝙪𝙨𝙩𝙞𝙘𝙚, 𝙥𝙤𝙬𝙚𝙧 𝙛𝙡𝙤𝙬𝙨 𝙛𝙧𝙤𝙢 𝙡𝙚𝙜𝙞𝙩𝙞𝙢𝙖𝙘𝙮: 𝙣𝙤 𝙫𝙚𝙩𝙤, 𝙣𝙤 𝙨𝙚𝙖𝙩, 𝙣𝙤 𝙖𝙧𝙨𝙚𝙣𝙖𝙡 𝙘𝙖𝙣 𝙢𝙖𝙠𝙚 𝙖 𝙬𝙧𝙤𝙣𝙜 𝙞𝙣𝙩𝙤 𝙖 𝙧𝙞𝙜𝙝𝙩.
The first asks who holds the keys. The second asks whether the door should ever have been locked against justice at all.
𝗔 𝘄𝗼𝗿𝗹𝗱 𝘄𝗲𝗮𝗿𝘆 𝗼𝗳 𝗽𝗮𝗿𝗮𝗹𝘆𝘀𝗶𝘀 𝗱𝗼𝗲𝘀 𝗻𝗼𝘁 𝗻𝗲𝗲𝗱 𝗮 𝗯𝗲𝘁𝘁𝗲𝗿 𝗹𝗼𝗰𝗸. 𝗜𝘁 𝗻𝗲𝗲𝗱𝘀 𝘁𝗼 𝗿𝗲𝗺𝗲𝗺𝗯𝗲𝗿 𝘁𝗵𝗮𝘁 𝗷𝘂𝘀𝘁𝗶𝗰𝗲 𝘄𝗮𝘀 𝗮𝗹𝘄𝗮𝘆𝘀 𝗺𝗲𝗮𝗻𝘁 𝘁𝗼 𝗯𝗲 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗳𝗼𝘂𝗻𝗱𝗮𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻 𝗮𝗻𝗱 𝗹𝗮𝘄 𝗺𝘂𝘀𝘁 𝗯𝗲 𝗶𝘁𝘀 𝘀𝗲𝗿𝘃𝗮𝗻𝘁.
#JainacharyaOnWorldOrder #AbolishVetoAtUN #UNReform #UNSCReform #RuleOfJustice
@UN@antonioguterres@DrSJaishankar@PMOIndia@RichardGowan1@CrisisGroup@MofaJapan_en@UN_Spokesperson@UN_News_Centre
1/7. 𝗧𝗵𝗲 𝗨𝗡 𝗦𝗲𝗰𝗿𝗲𝘁𝗮𝗿𝘆-𝗚𝗲𝗻𝗲𝗿𝗮𝗹 𝗻𝗮𝗺𝗲𝘀 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗶𝗺𝗽𝘂𝗻𝗶𝘁𝘆 𝗼𝗳 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝘃𝗲𝘁𝗼-𝘄𝗶𝗲𝗹𝗱𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝗽𝗼𝘄𝗲𝗿𝘀 𝗮𝗻𝗱 𝗼𝗳𝗳𝗲𝗿𝘀 𝗺𝗼𝗿𝗲 𝘀𝗲𝗮𝘁𝘀 𝗮𝘁 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝘁𝗮𝗯𝗹𝗲 𝗮𝘀 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗿𝗲𝗺𝗲𝗱𝘆.
Source - https://t.co/hIgeV8dRbN
But impunity was never a shortage of chairs. It is the shape of the table itself.
The custodians keep mourning a broken spirit. The harder truth is that the structure is not broken at all. It is working exactly as it was built to work.
#JainacharyaOnWorldOrder #AbolishVetoAtUN #UNReform #UNSCReform
@UN@UN_News_Centre@PMOIndia@antonioguterres
2/7. Start with the #veto, and look closely at what it actually does. It does not merely leave the powerful unchecked. It makes the powerful lawful.
When one of the five acts or shields another who acts, the veto reaches down and converts the deed into something the system is forbidden to call a crime.
𝗧𝗵𝗶𝘀 𝗶𝘀 𝗻𝗼𝘁 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗮𝗯𝘀𝗲𝗻𝗰𝗲 𝗼𝗳 𝗹𝗮𝘄. 𝗧𝗵𝗶𝘀 𝗶𝘀 𝗹𝗮𝘄, 𝗺𝗮𝗻𝘂𝗳𝗮𝗰𝘁𝘂𝗿𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝗶𝗻𝗻𝗼𝗰𝗲𝗻𝗰𝗲 𝗼𝗻 𝗱𝗲𝗺𝗮𝗻𝗱.
#JainacharyaOnWorldOrder #AbolishVetoAtUN #UNReform #UNSCReform
@IntlCrimCourt@CIJ_ICJ@OpinioJuris
3/7. Now widen the lens. Almost the whole authority of #globalorder was gathered into a single house and inside that house, every decisive power was handed to five.
Such a concentration would be called dangerous anywhere on earth. Here it was made 𝗳𝗼𝘂𝗻𝗱𝗮𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻 𝗼𝗳 𝘄𝗼𝗿𝗹𝗱 𝗼𝗿𝗱𝗲𝗿 𝗶𝘁𝘀𝗲𝗹𝗳.
#JainacharyaOnWorldOrder #AbolishVetoAtUN #UNReform #UNSCReform
4/7. And yet 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗵𝗼𝘂𝘀𝗲 𝗶𝘀 ‘𝗽𝗮𝗿𝗮𝗹𝘆𝘇𝗲𝗱’.
All the world's authority sits within it and still it stands frozen because the #veto is a self-weakening instrument by design, built so that 𝗶𝘁𝘀 𝗴𝗿𝗲𝗮𝘁𝗲𝘀𝘁 𝗽𝗼𝘄𝗲𝗿𝘀 𝗰𝗮𝗻𝗰𝗲𝗹 𝗼𝗻𝗲 𝗮𝗻𝗼𝘁𝗵𝗲𝗿 𝗮𝘁 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗽𝗿𝗲𝗰𝗶𝘀𝗲 𝗺𝗼𝗺𝗲𝗻𝘁 𝗷𝘂𝘀𝘁𝗶𝗰𝗲 𝗶𝘀 𝗺𝗼𝘀𝘁 𝗻𝗲𝗲𝗱𝗲𝗱.
Total power, engineered to be unusable.
#JainacharyaOnWorldOrder #AbolishVetoAtUN #UNReform #UNSCReform
6/7. And the privilege is sealed at the very summit of law. It is written as 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗹𝗮𝘄 𝗮𝗯𝗼𝘃𝗲 𝗮𝗹𝗹 𝗹𝗮𝘄.
Article 103 of the Charter places its obligations above every other treaty on earth, so joined with the #VETO the exemption of the five rises above every court, every covenant, every justice at the apex of international law.
This is self-weakening core of the Rule of law.
𝗧𝗵𝗲 𝗼𝗿𝗱𝗲𝗿 𝗯𝗮𝘀𝗲𝗱 𝗼𝗻 𝘁𝗵𝗶𝘀 𝗴𝗮𝘃𝗲 𝗳𝗶𝘃𝗲 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗼𝗻𝗹𝘆 𝗸𝗲𝘆𝘀 & 𝗠𝗮𝗰𝗵𝗶𝗻𝗲 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗹𝗼𝗰𝗸𝘀 𝘁𝗼 𝗷𝗮𝗺 𝗷𝘂𝘀𝘁𝗶𝗰𝗲 𝘁𝗵𝗮𝘁 𝗲𝘃𝗲𝗿 𝗮𝗽𝗽𝗿𝗼𝗮𝗰𝗵𝗲𝗱 𝘁𝗵𝗲𝗺.
#JainacharyaOnWorldOrder #AbolishVetoAtUN #UNReform #UNSCReform
10/10. The Oakland court did not deliver justice but protected a procedure as prescribed by law.
But 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗶𝗻𝗷𝘂𝘀𝘁𝗶𝗰𝗲 𝗶𝘀 𝗿𝗲𝗮𝗹. 𝗜𝘁 𝘄𝗮𝘀 𝗱𝗼𝗻𝗲 𝘁𝗼 𝗲𝘃𝗲𝗿𝘆 𝗵𝘂𝗺𝗮𝗻 𝗯𝗲𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝘄𝗵𝗼𝘀𝗲 𝘄𝗼𝗿𝗸 𝗮𝗻𝗱 𝘄𝗼𝗿𝗱𝘀 𝗯𝘂𝗶𝗹𝘁 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗺𝗮𝗰𝗵𝗶𝗻𝗲. 𝗜𝘁 𝘄𝗮𝘀 𝗱𝗼𝗻𝗲 𝗼𝗻 𝗔𝗺𝗲𝗿𝗶𝗰𝗮𝗻 𝘀𝗼𝗶𝗹, 𝘂𝗻𝗱𝗲𝗿 𝗔𝗺𝗲𝗿𝗶𝗰𝗮𝗻 𝗹𝗮𝘄, 𝗯𝘆 𝗮𝗻 𝗔𝗺𝗲𝗿𝗶𝗰𝗮𝗻 𝗰𝗼𝘂𝗿𝘁 𝘁𝗵𝗮𝘁 𝗿𝗲𝗳𝘂𝘀𝗲𝗱 𝘁𝗼 𝗹𝗼𝗼𝗸 𝗮𝘁 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗰𝗮𝘀𝗲 𝗯𝗲𝗳𝗼𝗿𝗲 𝗶𝘁.
The crime against humanity was never examined. The promise broken, was never weighed.
The trillion-dollar enterprise built on a charity for mankind kept its valuation. Kept its data. Kept its supremacy.
What did the world get in return?
𝗔 𝗳𝗶𝗹𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝗱𝗲𝗮𝗱𝗹𝗶𝗻𝗲.
#JainacharyaOnWorldOrder
#RuleofJustice #MuskVsOpenAI
9/10. Ask why this case had to be closed so quickly.
The United States is in a tech race it cannot afford to lose. The lead it holds in artificial intelligence rests on a handful of American firms, of which OpenAI is the crown. Around that crown sits the largest private valuation in history, $852 billion. Around that valuation sits @Microsoft, @nvidia, the entire venture capital industry and trillions of dollars in American market value.
A real trial, one that examined whether the founding promise had been broken, would have threatened all of it. 𝗔 𝗳𝗶𝗻𝗱𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝗼𝗳 𝗯𝗲𝘁𝗿𝗮𝘆𝗮𝗹 𝘄𝗼𝘂𝗹𝗱 𝗵𝗮𝘃𝗲 𝗼𝗽𝗲𝗻𝗲𝗱 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗳𝗶𝗿𝗺 𝘁𝗼 𝗿𝗲𝘀𝘁𝗿𝘂𝗰𝘁𝘂𝗿𝗶𝗻𝗴, 𝗿𝗲𝘀𝘁𝗶𝘁𝘂𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻, 𝗽𝗲𝗿𝗵𝗮𝗽𝘀 𝗱𝗶𝘀𝘀𝗼𝗹𝘂𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻.
The American tech bubble would have wobbled.
The China lead would have closed.
The court did not let the question be asked.
𝗧𝗵𝗲 𝗰𝗿𝗼𝘄𝗻 𝘄𝗮𝘀 𝗽𝗿𝗼𝘁𝗲𝗰𝘁𝗲𝗱. 𝗧𝗵𝗲 𝗯𝘂𝗯𝗯𝗹𝗲 𝘄𝗮𝘀 𝗽𝗿𝗼𝘁𝗲𝗰𝘁𝗲𝗱. 𝗧𝗵𝗲 𝗿𝗮𝗰𝗲 𝘄𝗮𝘀 𝗽𝗿𝗼𝘁𝗲𝗰𝘁𝗲𝗱.
How? By the 𝗨𝗦’𝘀 𝘄𝗲𝗮𝗽𝗼𝗻𝗶𝘇𝗮𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻 𝗼𝗳 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗿𝘂𝗹𝗲 𝗼𝗳 𝗹𝗮𝘄.
And 𝗵𝘂𝗺𝗮𝗻𝗶𝘁𝘆 𝘄𝗮𝘀 𝗯𝗮𝗿𝗿𝗲𝗱 𝗳𝗿𝗼𝗺 𝗲𝗻𝘁𝗲𝗿𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝗮𝗻𝗱 𝘄𝗮𝘀 𝘀𝗲𝗻𝘁 𝗵𝗼𝗺𝗲 𝗳𝗿𝗼𝗺 𝗮𝗻 𝗔𝗺𝗲𝗿𝗶𝗰𝗮𝗻 𝗰𝗼𝘂𝗿𝘁 𝘄𝗶𝘁𝗵𝗼𝘂𝘁 𝗮 𝗵𝗲𝗮𝗿𝗶𝗻𝗴.
#JainacharyaOnWorldOrder
#RuleofJustice #MuskVsOpenAI
8/10. This was not the failure of one courtroom. This was the American legal system based on the rule of law performing exactly the function it has been built to perform.
A procedural rule, as prescribed by law, a filing deadline of three years, was used to keep the substance of the case from ever being heard.
This is how the powerful are shielded in the modern American court. Not by a finding of innocence. By a refusal to ask the question at all. 𝗧𝗵𝗲 𝗹𝗮𝘄 𝗯𝗲𝗰𝗮𝗺𝗲 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗱𝗲𝗶𝘁𝘆 𝗶𝗻 𝘁𝗵𝗮𝘁 𝗿𝗼𝗼𝗺. 𝗝𝘂𝘀𝘁𝗶𝗰𝗲 𝗯𝗲𝗰𝗮𝗺𝗲 𝗶𝘁𝘀 𝘀𝗲𝗿𝘃𝗮𝗻𝘁.
And what the law shielded, in the same breath, was the most valuable asset in the American economy.
#JainacharyaOnWorldOrder
#RuleofJustice #MuskVsOpenAI
6/10. In that Oakland courtroom stood two parties.
@elonmusk arrived as a competitor demanding $150 billion in damages. @sama defended a transformation that has carried @OpenAI from a charitable promise to a private fortune.
But the party that should concern us is a third one. And it had no lawyer in that American courtroom.
𝗛𝘂𝗺𝗮𝗻𝗶𝘁𝘆 𝗶𝘁𝘀𝗲𝗹𝗳. 𝗪𝗶𝘁𝗵𝗼𝘂𝘁 𝗮 𝘀𝗲𝗮𝘁. 𝗪𝗶𝘁𝗵𝗼𝘂𝘁 𝗮 𝘃𝗼𝗶𝗰𝗲.
What the court chose to defend in its place and what it chose to refuse, is the rest of this story.
#JainacharyaOnWorldOrder
#RuleofJustice #MuskVsOpenAI