Nitin

[Nitin @Nitinbhatt03]

I always recommended FundingPips whenever someone asked which prop firm to join. Whenever I saw posts about Device ID (CID) violations, I assumed the trader was at fault. I never thought a firm this large could make such a mistake. Today, I’m the one facing the same situation.

[Nitin @Nitinbhatt03]

@Naorem_D_C3bi @Khldfx If the no.1 firm did this what about other firm 💀

[Nitin @Nitinbhatt03]

@Limitless_Noman https://t.co/qo1MmG4F27

[Nitin @Nitinbhatt03]

FINALLY THE CEO OF FUNDING PIPS HAS ANSWERED ‼️

Where's the date, time, and complete login record? Stop posting selective screenshots Instead provide a verifiable evidence. (Details) slap me with the proper evidence and then i will quit the whole trading industry . @Khldfx

[Nitin @Nitinbhatt03]

@ambitiousmind06 @Khldfx @fundingpips @PFRT_X @propfirmeye @PropFirmMarkets No detailed proofs shared even not got the refund of banned accounts

[Nitin @Nitinbhatt03]

FINALLY THE CEO OF FUNDING PIPS HAS ANSWERED ‼️

Where's the date, time, and complete login record? Stop posting selective screenshots Instead provide a verifiable evidence. (Details) slap me with the proper evidence and then i will quit the whole trading industry . @Khldfx

[Nitin @Nitinbhatt03]

@hubatrades @Khldfx A CID match alone does not automatically prove that two people shared the same physical device. Other evidence (login history, IP addresses, locations, trading behavior, timestamps, etc.) is usually needed to support that conclusion.

[Nitin @Nitinbhatt03]

@MaxMindx @Khldfx A CID match alone does not automatically prove that two people shared the same physical device. Other evidence (login history, IP addresses, locations, trading behavior, timestamps, etc.) is usually needed to support that conclusion.

[Nitin @Nitinbhatt03]

@Mohamazinggg @Khldfx A CID match alone does not automatically prove that two people shared the same physical device. Other evidence (login history, IP addresses, locations, trading behavior, timestamps, etc.) is usually needed to support that conclusion.

[Nitin @Nitinbhatt03]

@VelvetQueen__ @Khldfx A CID match alone does not automatically prove that two people shared the same physical device. Other evidence (login history, IP addresses, locations, trading behavior, timestamps, etc.) is usually needed to support that conclusion.

[Nitin @Nitinbhatt03]

@RobMirlach @Khldfx Bro where is the detailed proof ?
A CID match alone does not automatically prove that two people shared the same physical device. Other evidence (login history, IP addresses, locations, trading behavior, timestamps, etc.) is usually needed to support that conclusion.

[Nitin @Nitinbhatt03]

@Mohamazinggg @Dioslev No detailed proof + no refunds direct ban nice strategy

[Nitin @Nitinbhatt03]

FINALLY THE CEO OF FUNDING PIPS HAS ANSWERED ‼️

Where's the date, time, and complete login record? Stop posting selective screenshots Instead provide a verifiable evidence. (Details) slap me with the proper evidence and then i will quit the whole trading industry . @Khldfx

[Nitin @Nitinbhatt03]

@onlyequities @Khldfx There were no detailed proofs have been shared yet

[Nitin @Nitinbhatt03]

@Usman_Igwe09 @Khldfx Where is the detailed proof banning and no refund is not expected by no.1 firm in cfd

[Nitin @Nitinbhatt03]

FINALLY THE CEO OF FUNDING PIPS HAS ANSWERED ‼️

Where's the date, time, and complete login record? Stop posting selective screenshots Instead provide a verifiable evidence. (Details) slap me with the proper evidence and then i will quit the whole trading industry . @Khldfx

[Nitin @Nitinbhatt03]

@rick_guy111 @fundingpips @Khldfx Where are the detailed proofs

[Nitin @Nitinbhatt03]

FINALLY THE CEO OF FUNDING PIPS HAS ANSWERED ‼️

Where's the date, time, and complete login record? Stop posting selective screenshots Instead provide a verifiable evidence. (Details) slap me with the proper evidence and then i will quit the whole trading industry . @Khldfx

[Nitin @Nitinbhatt03]

@Ovidotfx Banning without detailed proof and no refund is not what expected from no.1 firm

[Nitin @Nitinbhatt03]

FINALLY THE CEO OF FUNDING PIPS HAS ANSWERED ‼️

Where's the date, time, and complete login record? Stop posting selective screenshots Instead provide a verifiable evidence. (Details) slap me with the proper evidence and then i will quit the whole trading industry . @Khldfx

[Nitin @Nitinbhatt03]

@Propfirmedge https://t.co/qo1MmG4F27

[Nitin @Nitinbhatt03]

FINALLY THE CEO OF FUNDING PIPS HAS ANSWERED ‼️

Where's the date, time, and complete login record? Stop posting selective screenshots Instead provide a verifiable evidence. (Details) slap me with the proper evidence and then i will quit the whole trading industry . @Khldfx

[Nitin @Nitinbhatt03]

@Propfirmedge Then where are the proofs ? @Propfirmedge

[Nitin @Nitinbhatt03]

@thefundedroom Guys attention

[Nitin @Nitinbhatt03]

FINALLY THE CEO OF FUNDING PIPS HAS ANSWERED ‼️

Where's the date, time, and complete login record? Stop posting selective screenshots Instead provide a verifiable evidence. (Details) slap me with the proper evidence and then i will quit the whole trading industry . @Khldfx

[Nitin @Nitinbhatt03]

@Habeeb_M3 @TrustedPropHub Where is the detailed proof ?
A CID match alone does not automatically prove that two people shared the same physical device. Other evidence (login history, IP addresses, locations, trading behavior, timestamps, etc.) is usually needed to support that conclusion.

[Nitin @Nitinbhatt03]

@Ralle1012618 @TrustedPropHub A CID match alone does not automatically prove that two people shared the same physical device. Other evidence (login history, IP addresses, locations, trading behavior, timestamps, etc.) is usually needed to support that conclusion.

[Nitin @Nitinbhatt03]

@fxhustle7 @Khldfx @Ju_Trades @fundingpips If no.1 prop is doing this then u know what can other firm do

[Nitin @Nitinbhatt03]

@Khldfx @Atul_shukla1 A CID match alone does not automatically prove that two people shared the same physical device. Other evidence (login history, IP addresses, locations, trading behavior, timestamps, etc.) is usually needed to support that conclusion.