Fuzzy Dice in a Cadillac

Fiercely average. Foolishly interested in politics. Te Deum laudamus. Whatsit/Who/Which. Obsessive re-tweeter. Wherever I roam, Ohio is home.

[Fuzzy Dice in a Cadillac @NoDiceSaidMom]

Every day, remember: that which is good, true and beautiful points to God.

[Diana Alastair💚🤍💜 ⚢ ❌❌✡️ @sappholives83]

Think for a moment. Who benefits from the creation of a group of emotionally immature adults with child-like bodies who are 10-15 IQ points slower than they would otherwise have been?

Qui bono? Who _really_ benefits from the effects of this medication? Because it’s not the children who are taking it.

Puberty blockers are nothing more than another facet of the transvestitic fetish that drives male transition. Feminizing and castrating young boys is a sexual fantasy for many of these men. Reduxx has spent years investigating and cataloging the involvement of senior WPATH members with an online archive filled with stories about the castration of young boys.

The goal driving the push for blockers is the desire to create “dolls,” or boys who can pass as girls, whom these men can then engage with sexually in ways that range from using them as unwitting fantasy material to engaging in actual sexual contact, often after online manipulation. The fact that these medications significantly damage a person’s intelligence and emotional development is seen as a bonus, as are their underdeveloped genitalia

Puberty blockers are a pedophile’s dream drug. They leave victims with childlike bodies, and minds that are easier to manipulate and control. The fact that trans-identifying men are the loudest supporters of this practice is no coincidence . It is both a deliberate attempt to turn confused and insecure boys into fantasy wank material, and an attempt to live vicariously through them.

Nothing would suit the adult mtf community more than to have a steady supply of feminized boys to manipulate and abuse, and that’s what puberty blockers provide.

Blockers also serve to lock the child in to medical transition: whereas 84% of children with gender dysphoria will outgrow it naturally if left to their own devices, 98% of children who take blockers will go on to take cross-sex hormones.

There is a mountain of evidence that shows the harm caused by puberty blockers, but the trans community continues to lie to vulnerable children about their effects. Portrayed as a “pause button,” they instead leave the children who take them with significant IQ deficits, underdeveloped genitalia, and significantly lower emotional intelligence. Instead of beginning a study of their effects, the UK should be banning their use for the suppression of normal puberty. The fact that this study is going ahead is clear evidence that someone is pulling strings, because there is absolutely no reason to continue inflicting this damage upon children — not to study it, not for any reason.

[PoIiMath @politicalmath]

Here are things that the Platner story has that the Kavanaugh allegations did not have:
1) proof of contact between the accuser and the accused
2) documented allegations from the accuser naming the accused to others *before* the accused rose to the national stage
3) multiple accusers with documented proof of contact and long-standing recognition of abuse

Liberals who are saying "this is just like Kavanaugh" are just reminding everyone of how flimsy the Kavanaugh accusations were

They are also letting you know that they don't care about evidence. They will accuse their enemies without any documented evidence. They will protect their own even with mountains of evidence.

[Nordic Model Now! @nordicmodelnow]

“I was an altruistic surrogate for some friends, carrying and giving birth to twins. It was an incredibly traumatic experience, and afterwards I had to receive treatment for post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). I never talk to anyone about my experience as I still find it utterly devastating.

[…]

I am left with birth injuries, incontinence, and with diastasic recti (separation of the abdominal muscles) which all cause me daily problems. I do not know what the long term health impacts will be of taking large amounts of synthetic hormones, nor the potential increased risk of breast cancer as I did not breastfeed the babies.

I am now completely against ALL surrogacy, both commercial (which is completely immoral in my view) and altruistic unpaid surrogacy. The potential for abuse is too great. Women should not be encouraged to endanger their emotional and physical health and safety for other people’s ‘need’ to have babies. Women matter. Women should not be encouraged to put ourselves second, and to risk our lives for other people.

I recommend that ALL surrogacy should be made unlawful as other countries have done. The law should not be changed to make it easier to exploit women, both women who are vulnerable through poverty and those who are simply well-meaning and ill-informed like me.

I also often think of the poor, young female student in Eastern Europe who had to endure egg harvesting and the life-long consequences of that, to pay for her studies. There is very little that is ‘ethical’ about surrogacy.”

Link to the full article in the next tweet.

[Spencer @chris_cross1498]

I’ve taken a bit of a battering on here today by ‘trans’ activists so I want to make my position crystal clear.

I do not care if people want to wear clothes that represent the opposite sex. I do not care if adults think they are the opposite sex. Live your life. My only boundary is: I’m not required to play along or affirm it.

My problem with the trans movement is the medicalisation of children. Puberty blockers, cross-sex hormones, and surgeries pushed on kids who are too young to consent to permanent changes.

This is the fundamental difference from being gay. If someone says they’re gay, it requires no medication, no surgery, and no medical pathway at all. If a child says they’re trans, the movement wants them on drugs as fast as possible and then surgery.

[AG @AGHamilton29]

Everyone should be terrified that many Democrats are openly embracing a broken and economically illiterate ideology that destroyed countless countries and led to the death of over 100 million people in the 20th century.

[Laura Powell @LauraPowellEsq]

Throughout her dissent in the case protecting girls’ sports, Justice Jackson insists on using the phrase “sex assigned at birth.”

The principal dissent, authored by Justice Sotomayor, instead uses the phrase “sex identified at birth,” which is somewhat better misleading because it does not suggest that a doctor arbitrarily assigns a person’s sex. But it’s still inaccurate, given that sex is commonly detected before birth. The phrase attempts to create the impression that biological sex is simply a label applied at birth that is subject to change.

In reality, sex is established at conception and cannot change. There is nothing more intrinsic to who we are as individuals.

Justice Thomas criticized the wordplay employed by gender ideology in his concurrence: “To use language to obscure reality—to show indifference regarding the truth—is to lie to the public and cease to treat our fellow citizens as equals.”

[Jonathan Turley @JonathanTurley]

Before reporting on the transgender case, NBC actually gave an effective trigger warning that it would be quoting the court in the use of terms like "biological male" and "biological female." https://t.co/bN4NImmroF This is how the press becomes a parody of itself.

[Mark Hemingway @Heminator]

At every turn, it’s trans people that have been the aggressors demanding access to female only spaces.

Pretending they’re being “targeted” here is a complete inversion of reality.

[Sharron Davies HoL MBE @sharrond62]

A small reminder very mediocre college swimmer Lia ( William) Thomas 6ft 4’ went from over 600th in U.S. men’s college distance swimming to beating three women’s USA Olympic medalists in sprinting! Males do not belong in sport for females… at ANY levels. We’re worthy of our own fair sports category.

[Paula Scanlan @PaulaYScanlan]

I’m so glad the courts finally figured out what I knew in the locker room undressing with Lia Thomas

[Riley Gaines @Riley_Gaines_]

Justice Jackson, Kagan, and Sotomayor ruled against women having equal protection under the law.

Liberal women, yet again, prove to be the biggest hurdle women face.

[Bishop Robert Barron @BishopBarron]

Like many others, I have been alarmed by the success of certain politicians in our country who identify as extreme socialists or communists.

This is not a matter of classical liberals triumphing over standard-issue conservatives; this is the victory of people who stand athwart the fundamental principles that undergird our country.

There are many reasons why I detest Communism, but I want to draw attention to just one issue of supreme importance.

Karl Marx said that the first critique is the critique of religion. He meant that, before a complete re-working of the politics and economics of a society can take place, religion has to be taken down.

This is because religion, as he saw it, is the “opium of the masses,” a drug taken to dull our sensitivity to the suffering caused by economic exploitation. As long as the suffering populace is lured into complacency by fantasies about God's providence and the promise of eternal life, they will never rise up and throw off their chains.

But there is a second reason why the elimination of religion is of paramount significance for Marx.

Communism aspires to be a totalizing system, involving the government's control over education, entertainment, communication, politics, and especially economics.

What stands resolutely athwart this ambition is religion, which declares that all of these societal expressions are finally under the judgment of God. So, if you want Communism to succeed, religion has to be stamped out.

If you doubt me on any of this, I would encourage you to read the recent histories of China, Russia, Cuba, Nicaragua, Vietnam, Cambodia, and Venezuela. Revisit those histories and tell me I'm wrong about the attack on religion.

Might I encourage my fellow believers in God not to be complacent in the face of this very troubling development in the American body politic?

[Fuzzy Dice in a Cadillac @NoDiceSaidMom]

@NBCNews Boys can compete in boys sports, and girls can compete in girls sports. Nobody is banned from competing in sports.

[Billboard Chris 🌎 @BillboardChris]

🚨 Huge victory!

The Supreme Court has upheld the West Virginia and Idaho laws which ban males from female sports!

“Men and boys with gender dysphoria are not women or girls, even if they believe that they are. Sex is an immutable ‘biological’ characteristic … it is binary … and ‘man’ and ‘woman,’ ‘boy’ and ‘girl,’ are the terms that correspond to adults and children of each sex.”

[Fuzzy Dice in a Cadillac @NoDiceSaidMom]

@BBCNews The US supreme Court upheld bans on men and boys in sports that are meant for women and girls.

[Sall Grover @salltweets]

Thank you, US Supreme Court.

[Bishop Robert Barron @BishopBarron]

In a recent interview, Archbishop Vincenzo Paglia, former grand chancellor of the John Paul II Institute on Marriage and Family Life, confirmed the worst suspicions that many of us had.

He admitted that the changes he made at the Institute during the Pope Francis years were designed to initiate a "very profound" reform of the idea of the natural law.

Instead of absolute moral norms grounded in a keen understanding of the basic goods, he and his colleagues were proposing a moral theory rooted in historical discernment of subjective and cultural experience--not an "armchair theology" but one operating "within history and within people's lives."

This, of course, is the language of trendy postmodernism, and it is dangerous indeed.

Allow me to illustrate the principle with one example. Is slavery wrong?

Intrinsically wrong? Wrong no matter what public opinion polls say about it, no matter what the current consensus on it might be? I imagine any decent person would say yes.

But that yes is predicated upon precisely what the tradition calls the natural law and the basic goods. There are some values so fundamental that acts repugnant to them are by their very nature wicked.

If you want a highly articulate presentation of this idea, go to St. John Paul II's Veritatis Splendor.

If we say that this is just "armchair theologizing" and that morality is a function of ever-shifting cultural and experiential data, then why couldn't slavery be justified?

One of the very smartest persons that ever lived, the philosopher Aristotle, thought it was; extremely bright and morally upright persons in our country, well into the 19th century, thought it was permissible.

Who is to say whether the consensus might shift back again? Who is to say that "lived experience" might come to justify it?

What any truly coherent moral program requires is the very thing that Archbishop Paglia and his colleagues were endeavoring to eliminate, namely, absolute moral norms.

Ridding ourselves of these in the name of freedom or pastoral sensitivity actually renders moral discourse dysfunctional, just as relativizing the basic principle of logic would render any rational conversation impossible.

The Archbishop's interview, frankly, reminded me of the discussions I had at the Synod on Synodality with some of my German colleagues. Under the rubric of the development of doctrine, they were eager to relativize or radically change the principles undergirding classical morality. If this was and is truly the game, we have ventured onto perilous seas.

Link to the article below.

[Diana Alastair💚🤍💜 ⚢ ❌❌✡️ @sappholives83]

There is a vast difference between sexualizing a child and acknowledging that some children have deviant sexual impulses. I’m a homicide investigator with sex crimes experience. Candice DeLong, whom I quoted above, is an FBI profiler. She studies sex killers, among others, and male transvestites are massively overrepresented in that particular population.

The fact is that sexually deviant behavior doesn’t flick on like a switch at age 18. If it did, minors would not commit rape. Anyone who has studied abnormal psychology knows that paraphiliac, or fetishistic, impulses frequently begin in childhood - even in prepubescence. Talking about this behavior is not “sexualizing a child,” and claiming otherwise is red flag behavior. Not only does silence aid predators; so does muddling the concept of child sexualization.

Let me be clear — sexualizing a child is a predatory act. So is pushing sexually deviant children into medicalization to further your own ends when what they need is psychological treatment.

Little boys who get off on crossdressing need to be encouraged in this behavior like they need a hole in the head. Not only does it encourage sexual deviance and psychiatric dysfunction; it also puts women and children at risk when these boys then grow up to become sex offenders.

[Anna Maria Junus @JunusAnna]

Men can pee anywhere. In bushes, by the side of the road, in alleyways. And it's easier for them to sexually assault women than it is for women to sexually assault men.

Yet, it's women that have to give up their bathrooms so that men get ALL the bathrooms and women have none.

[Diana Alastair💚🤍💜 ⚢ ❌❌✡️ @sappholives83]

“Men have been telling us who and what we are all of our lives.”

Amazing speech.