NoJab4Me

[The Vigilant Fox 🦊 @VigilantFox]

He proved unvaccinated kids were healthier. They revoked his license.

Dr. Paul Thomas studied 3,324 children and found unvaccinated kids had FEWER doctor visits and BETTER health outcomes.

Here’s what his data showed:

Fever – 9.1× higher in vaccinated
Ear Pain – 3.4× higher
Otitis Media (Ear Infections) – 2.9× higher
Conjunctivitis – 2.4× higher
Eye Disorders (Other) – 1.8× higher
Asthma – 5.2× higher
Allergic Rhinitis (Hay Fever) – 6.9× higher
Sinusitis – 4.3× higher
Breathing Issues – 2.9× higher
Anemia – 5.5× higher
Eczema – 4.5× higher
Urticaria (Hives) – 2.1× higher
Dermatitis – 1.4× higher
Behavioral Issues – 4.1× higher
Gastroenteritis – 4.7× higher
Weight/Eating Disorders – 2.5× higher
ADHD – 0 cases in unvaccinated group

*Data based on how often children visited the doctor for each condition*

Instead of investigating the findings, the Oregon Medical Board suspended Dr. Thomas’s license—just days after the study was published. Months later, the study was retracted.

Dr. Paul Thomas isn’t the only one who faced swift punishment for publishing inconvenient science.

Other doctors have faced similar consequences for exposing the same pattern.

The question is: Why are doctors being punished simply for comparing vaccinated and unvaccinated kids?

[The Vigilant Fox 🦊 @VigilantFox]

Look closely at this graph — the results are jaw-dropping.

Vaccinated kids: 57% chance of developing a chronic disease in the first 10 years of life.
Unvaccinated kids: Only 17%.

“That should shock everyone.”

This figure is nearly identical to national data, which says that 54% of American children now have at least one chronic condition.

The graph comes from a vax vs. unvax study that’s been buried for five years.

Dr. Marcus Zervos led the research but chose not to publish it, admitting, “Publishing something like that, I might as well retire. I’d be finished.”

[The Vigilant Fox 🦊 @VigilantFox]

Bombshell vax vs. unvax study finally sees the light of day — and the results are staggering.

Dr. Marcus Zervos led the study, but he decided not to publish it because “publishing something like that, I might as well retire. I’d be finished.”

Here’s what the study revealed:

• Vaccinated children were 4.29 times more likely to have asthma.

• Three times higher risk for atopic diseases (like eczema).

• Nearly six times higher risk for autoimmune disorders — a category that includes over 80 different diseases.

• 5.5 times higher risk for neurodevelopmental disorders.

• 2.9 times more motor disabilities.

• 4.5 times more speech disorders.

• Three times more developmental delays.

• Six times more acute and chronic ear infections.

• In nearly 2,000 unvaccinated children, there were ZERO cases of ADHD, diabetes, behavioral problems, learning disabilities, intellectual disabilities, tics, or other psychological disorders.

• The study’s conclusion is devastating. It states: “[I]n contrast to our expectations, we found that exposure to vaccination was independently associated with an overall 2.5-fold INCREASE in the likelihood of developing a chronic health condition when compared to children unexposed to vaccination.”

[NoJab4Me @NoJab4MeThanks]

@thevivafrei @rcmpgrcpolice @InspectionCan Time for some target practice on those drones. Bring out the clay and trap shooters!!!

[Dr Clare Craig ✝️ @ClareCraigPath]

New video from Australia exposing regulatory failures but also a failed justice system such that they haven't been held to account.

https://t.co/Qfgq2wqmeo

[NoJab4Me @NoJab4MeThanks]

@SecKennedy Thank you secretary Kennedy!!!! Well done sir. 👏🏽👏🏽👏🏽

[Dr. Crisanna Shackelford @DrC_Shackelford]

What?
Are we talking about Moderna’s new mRNA COVID shot, mNEXSPIKE®? It wasn’t tested against a true placebo. It was tested against Spikevax — a product already associated with myocarditis, neuropathy, menstrual disruption, and more. This loop of relative validation isn’t science — it’s marketing disguised as methodology.

Worse, what does Moderna - or HHS mean by a “smaller protein”? In the context of gene-based therapeutics, that phrase is scientifically meaningless without further explanation.

mRNA platforms don’t inject proteins — they deliver genetic instructions that hijack the body’s cellular machinery to synthesize proteins internally. So if this shot codes for a “smaller protein,” we need to ask:

Is it a truncated version of the spike protein?

Has the genetic sequence been modified to produce a new antigen or epitope?

Does it code for a non-spike protein entirely (like the N protein or another structural component)?

Is this a fusion or chimeric protein engineered for altered immunogenicity?

Each of those options represents a fundamental change in how the immune system will respond — and in how we assess risk. Yet no clear biochemical characterization or peer-reviewed data has been presented. If this is a novel antigen, it could trigger different immune pathways, alter biodistribution, or generate new classes of adverse events — and without a true placebo control, we won’t see them clearly.

Simply calling it a “smaller protein” is not a scientific answer. It’s a PR placeholder that papers over the real question: What exactly is this gene therapy coding for — and why haven’t we been told?

The public is being asked to trust a product that wasn’t transparently characterized, wasn’t trialed against baseline risk, and won’t complete follow-up studies until after an entire political cycle has passed. Implications!

We’ve crossed into post-scientific territory where novel bioengineering is fast-tracked under the cover of “non-inferiority,” and vague immunological language is treated as adequate informed consent. This isn’t innovation — it’s institutionalized ambiguity.

If you approve gene therapy while calling it a vaccine, and waive first principles like placebo controls in the name of “ethics,” then you’ve already rigged the outcome.

We are not anti-science. We are pro informed consent.

@US_FDA: Define “smaller protein.”
@CDCgov: Show us mucosal efficacy.
@SecKennedy: You know what real science looks like. Hold the line.
@NIHDirector_Jay
PS...This is how we end up trapped in a loop of relative comparisons, where each new iteration is judged not by its own merits, but by the mediocrity that preceded it. It’s a scientific echo chamber dressed in the language of ethics.
And...btw...post-approval, they’re announcing trials for pregnant women and middle-aged adults — as if they’re asking the important questions after giving the answer. That’s not gold-standard science. It’s regulatory gaslighting.

If we continue down this path, we’re not just normalizing bad science — we’re building the architecture of coercion with the bricks of institutional trust! Stop.

Cc: @uTobian @SharylAttkisson @MdBreathe
@IamBrookJackson @C__Herridge @LeslieManookian
@DrC_Shackelford

[NoJab4Me @NoJab4MeThanks]

@SecKennedy @US_FDA SO, YOU APPROVED A PRODUCT TO BE RELEASED INTO THE PUBLIC BEFORE IT'S BEEN FULLY STUDIED??? And it uses nanoparticles and the non-human foreign genetic material again? The same GENETIC -NANOPARTICLE TYPE INJECTION that already has so many side effects?

[Mary Talley Bowden MD @MaryBowdenMD]

One of the biggest myths in medicine—shut down!

[NoJab4Me @NoJab4MeThanks]

@SecKennedy @DrMak

[No College Mandates @NCM4Ever]

This is what the end looks like but don’t be fooled as most healthcare students are still required to take C19 vaccines to complete programs. @SecKennedy

[NoJab4Me @NoJab4MeThanks]

@DrMaka

[Kris Held,MD @kksheld]

I remember our pediatrician prescribing fluoride drops to my babies and obediently, unquestioningly administering them. This is another example of why I no longer trust top down medical guidelines and agonize about what is happening to humanity today. I regret my blind obedience as a young physician mother and pray my daughters will mother with eyes-wide-open, Godly, ethical skepticism.

[NoJab4Me @NoJab4MeThanks]

@SecKe

[Five Times August @FiveTimesAugust]

Lowering drug costs?

Good!

Taking bad chemicals out of food?

Great!

Leaving unnecessary and harmful covid shots on the childhood schedule and ignoring discussion on the dangers of mRNA?

Criminal.

[Camus @newstart_2024]

How about no...

In a new preprint study, researchers from institutions funded by the National Institutes of Health, USDA, and U.S. Department of Energy have demonstrated that an experimental mRNA-lipid nanoparticle (mRNA-LNP) vaccine targeting the H5 HA protein induces strong immune responses in Holstein calves.

This study provides timely and potentially transformative insights into a potential intervention strategy. The vaccine, adapted from the same platform used in human COVID-19 mRNA vaccines, may help reduce viral spread among cattle and limit the risk of zoonotic transmission.

[NoJab4Me @NoJab4MeThanks]

@Ro

[Mary Talley Bowden MD @MaryBowdenMD]

25,000 American children a day are getting these shots. What is taking so long @DrMakaryFDA?

[NoJab4Me @NoJab4MeThanks]

@Rober

[Dr. Dawn Michael @DawnsMission]

At this point isn't worth stoping all vaccines that we give to babies until we know they are completely safe?

[Mary Talley Bowden MD @MaryBowdenMD]

25,000 American children a day are getting these shots. What is taking so long @DrMakaryFDA?

[Mikki Willis Official @MikkiWillis]

The Voices They Tried to Erase Will Be Heard

The moment is almost here.

On Thursday, May 15th at 6:00 PM CDT, the truth will be unleashed to the world.

You’re invited to experience the global online premiere of Follow the Silenced—a powerful, heart-wrenching documentary that tells the stories of Americans forever changed by the COVID vaccine trials.

Be the first to watch it for FREE online! Register at
followthesilenceddotcom/register

You can even host your own watch party the night of the premiere. Join 348+ other people hosting watch parties across the USA and around the world including Canada, UK, Australia, New Zealand, Sweden, Portugal, Argentina, Germany, France, Denmark, Philippines, South Africa, and more!

Please share far and wide!

[William Makis MD @MakisMedicine]

@DrMakaryFDA COVID-19 mRNA Vaccines give children increased risk of CANCER for life.

Take the damn mRNA shots off the market Marty.

THEN you can fix the infant formula and Fruit Loops.

[NoJab4Me @NoJab4MeThanks]

@DrMakaryFDA We aren't pressured & coerced to use infant formula or eat fruit loops. Take the covid shots off the childhood schedule! Don't allow any shot that isn't tested against a placebo, aka all childhood vaccine injections need to be tested properly.

[Dr. Stella Immanuel MD @stella_immanuel]

If we repeal National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986. We would not have to do anything else, the market would solve itself. And vaccines, if any at all will be manufactured will be safe and effective.