[A Thread] For fun's sake, I'm going to be posting a bunch of links of music that I'm enjoying for time to time. Mostly soundtracks and lofi ahead to chill to, ye been warned. I'll start with this https://t.co/i0R8hm4oLO
@MaximumCapron@JackTipGuin@HowIMineFish No, I mean that even if you have the book in front of you, if you don't understand the concepts it simply doesn't help much. Doesn't matter how long you look at the book or the text for
@TruthHurtsDemz@151Call@ChrisGloninger I see. So we can agree that water vapor will turn back into water and ice. When it is water and ice, how does it impact the atmosphere? Additionally when we pump CO2 into the atmosphere, when does it decrease?
@TruthHurtsDemz@151Call@ChrisGloninger When water vapor reaches cooler temperatures in the upper atmosphere, what happens? When CO2 reaches cooler temperatures in the upper atmosphere, what happens?
Introducing Ode Poetry. Ode is a wonderful poetry pharmacy that reads you a poem for the moment you’re in. Just tell Ode what you're feeling, and it uses Microsoft AI audio models to connect you with the same work that poetry expert William Sieghart would recommend.
The best technology doesn't replace human creativity, it helps more people experience it. Super proud of the team for making this truly humanist tool. More in the blog:
https://t.co/oCDTiIdXxW
"Everyone has the ability to do great things"
And the great things are defined here as making 150 billion off of slave labor and cloak and dagger espionage
American liberals embracing this blatant corruption is exactly why their country is in the state it is in. If you're not principally opposed to corruption, if you cheer and make light of it whenever it favours you, you are furthering the rot at the heart of your society.
Claude Sonnet 5 achieves 53 on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, but without promotional pricing will cost more per task than Opus 4.8
We supported @AnthropicAI to evaluate Claude Sonnet 5 ahead of release: with max effort it improves 6 points over Sonnet 4.6 to achieve the same Intelligence Index as GPT-5.5 with high reasoning, but remains behind Opus 4.7 and 4.8
Key takeaways:
➤ Claude Sonnet 5 is the #5 model on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, only 2-3 points behind GPT-5.5 (xhigh) and Opus 4.8 (max)
➤ With max effort, Sonnet 5 works harder than previous Anthropic models: it used ~40% more output tokens per Intelligence Index task than Sonnet 4.6, and ~3x the agentic turns for our knowledge work evaluations AA-Briefcase and GDPval-AA. This behavior scales well with the ‘effort’ setting, with the max effort using around 6x more turns than low effort on GDPval-AA
➤ Claude Sonnet 5 costs more per task than Opus 4.8 before accounting for promotional pricing: Claude Sonnet 5 costs $2.29 per task on the Intelligence Index, a ~2x increase compared to Sonnet 4.6 and ~15% more than Claude Opus 4.8. This is driven entirely by increased token usage. Sonnet 5 retains the same $3/$15 per 1M input/output token pricing as Sonnet 4.6 (compared to $5/$25 for Opus 4.8), however Anthropic is offering a one-third reduction to $2/$10 until September 1. Our results use standard $3/$15 pricing
➤ Sonnet 5 matches or outperforms Opus 4.8 on agentic knowledge work tasks: on both AA-Briefcase and GDPval-AA, Claude Sonnet 5 sits just ahead of Opus 4.8, trailing only Claude Fable 5 (which is not currently generally available). These benchmarks test the ability of models to produce accurate and well-presented professional outputs using our open source reference agent harness, Stirrup
➤ For reasoning and knowledge-heavy tasks, Sonnet still sits behind its larger siblings: despite substantial gains across many evaluations, heavy reasoning and knowledge benchmarks still show Opus 4.8 ahead of Sonnet 5. On CritPt, a frontier physics reasoning benchmark developed by researchers at Argonne and UIUC, Sonnet 5 scores 17% - this is 14 points higher than its predecessor, but behind GLM-5.2, Claude Opus and Fable, and GPT-5.5 (xhigh and Pro)
➤ Sonnet 5 also showed significant improvements over Sonnet 4.6 on Terminal-Bench v2.1 (+9 points), Humanity’s Last Exam (+10 points), and SciCode (+7 points), with relatively flat scores elsewhere
Other key model details:
➤ Context window of 1 million tokens (equivalent to Sonnet 4.6)
➤ Pricing of $3/$15 per 1M tokens of input/output (reduced to $2/$10 until September 1); cache pricing remains at a 25% premium for cache writes ($3.75 per million tokens) with 5-minute time to live, and 90% discount for cache hits ($0.3 per million tokens)
➤ Effort remains the recommended way of configuring model performance and latency. Sonnet 5 adds an additional ‘xhigh’ effort setting relative to Sonnet 4.6, matching the 5 effort levels available on Opus 4.8 (max, xhigh, high, medium, low)
@aphysicist@matthewstoller How can you possibly say this in good faith? Why are you equating more money to money that was already being provided?
Why are you removing Musk's agency when doge was practically led by him?
Or is this all a d suck to get on the good side of this X's owner?