@liquidated777 Yeah, but since it's settle on daily closing below, it needs to settle under that level the chances are much much lower than just touching that price with an intraday spike.
Side note: much of the value is just what you think the implied or realized vol will be over next 40 days
@liquidated777 haha nah you're good. It's just basically a settle option that is only worth 9% (if the touch option is indeed worth 18% through end of year)
I do think both nates models and prediction markets pretty much nailed this election. Does not mean that either or both will be the same next election, but it really was pretty impressive
The argument of polls vs markets is an interesting one because yes they largely lined up but if looking for edge with one over the other, wouldn't you want to focus almost entirely on where they disagree?
Nate already did this with charts. I have no real dog in this fight as I don't really care what peoples conclusions are on this because it's really not terribly important
None of this means that any individual market will be priced correctly or will be predictive, but it could give us an idea of who to listen to and at what confidence vs everyone just saying their opinions as fact and not remembering their false predictions.
I do somewhat subscribe to the DARPA early prediction market idea of we have people put money on the line re their thoughts about events/future and we trust those who win more and who size positions appropriately (confidence).
I think most importantly spending cuts of the magnitude needed don't happen voluntarily. The market or an outside force needs to pressure politicians at this point