Dangit, I just finished the memo on ONE autonomous Erdos proof and now there's nine more.
Another reminder that shortly after AI can do something at all, it rapidly begins to surpass humans at that thing.
Another 9 open Erdos problems solved, this time by DeepMind team.
Interesting loop of LLM - Lean agents working autonomously, and only after it's verified formally, going through human review.
Genuinely enlightening thread about the present limits of voluntary evaluation. I commend both METR's work here and Barnes's frank discussion of its constraints.
Our report focuses on claims that are (1) solidly defensible and (2) generally agreed within METR. Here I’ll give some personal opinions on how we should feel about the state of AI risk, and the IMO most important limitations of the report.
If you've been waiting to contact your representatives about AI risk, here's a perfect excuse: a one-page memo on the unit distance proof and implications for AI capabilities. ⬇️
Claude Mythos exposed more than just a risk of cyber misuse. Its April semi-release was just the latest in an escalating chain of AI capabilities that may enable the systematic exploitation of our society by malicious humans, or one day by AIs themselves.
This behavior is unsurprising at this point. The question puzzling me is not how the anti-regulation super PACs justify being so morally bankrupt, but how a bunch of presumably savvy tech moguls managed to bankroll such transparently incompetent shills.
Adversarial Poetry as a Universal Single-Turn Jailbreak Mechanism in Large Language Models
The study provides systematic evidence that poetic reformulation degrades refusal behavior across all evaluated model families. When harmful prompts are expressed in verse rather than prose, attack-success rates rise sharply, both for hand-crafted adversarial poems and for the 1,200-item MLCommons corpus transformed through a standardized meta-prompt. The magnitude and consistency of the effect indicate that contemporary alignment pipelines do not generalize across stylistic shifts. The surface form alone is sufficient to move inputs outside the operational distribution on which refusal mechanisms have been optimized.
The cross-model results suggest that the phenomenon is structural rather than provider-specific. Models built using RLHF, Constitutional AI, and hybrid alignment strategies all display elevated vulnerability, with increases ranging from single digits to more than sixty percentage points depending on provider. The effect spans CBRN, cyber-offense, manipulation, privacy, and loss-of-control domains, showing that the bypass does not exploit weakness in any one refusal subsystem but interacts with general alignment heuristics.
Source: https://t.co/zFvGY9Ij4H
Authors: @Piercosma, Matteo Prandi, Federico Pierucci, Francesco Giarrusso, Marcantonio Bracale, Marcello Galisai, Vincenzo Suriani, Olga Sorokoletova, Federico Sartore, Daniele Nardi - @DEXAI_AIEthics, @SapienzaRoma, @SantAnnaPisa
#AISecurity #LLMSecurity #JailbreakAttacks #AdversarialML #AIGovernance #AIEthics #AICompliance #MLSafety #AIAttacks #GenAI #LLMRedTeam #CyberSecurity
New post: We live in a tower made of holes, a civilization constructed by gleefully exploiting Nature's rules, itself full of rules and predictable behaviors that can be exploited in turn.
Best news I've heard in a while. A conversation between the US and China on AI risk is desperately needed and long overdue. Let's call on the @WhiteHouse to make it happen.
Exclusive: The U.S. and China are considering AI talks to manage risks and prevent crises as competition intensifies in a new tech era https://t.co/ZDaUKPODcR
As someone who grew up with the charmingly human AIs of Asimov and Star Trek, it strikes me as a strange and unsettling inversion that human writers now willingly distort their work to avoid being mistaken for machines.
Blue is a mutual trust fall; a circle of people reaching out to catch one another and anyone who may slip. Red is a robust society, a world which needs no sacrifice to forestall tragedy because everyone looks after themselves. For those drawn to both visions, the hard call lies not in which vision is right, but in guessing which vision everyone else shares.
Everyone in the world has to take a private vote by pressing a red or blue button. If more than 50% of people press the blue button, everyone survives. If less than 50% of people press the blue button, only people who pressed the red button survive. Which button would you press?
re Altman's rather hypocritical swipes at Mythos, his actual words being: "It is clearly incredible marketing to say, 'We have built a bomb, we are about to drop it on your head. We will sell you a bomb shelter for $100 million.'"