@usemonologue@naveennaidu_m Does monologue store the recording locally in case transcription fails due to connectivity issues etc? I worry about losing a 30 min brain dump!
Also is there an api that agents can poll for new notes?
Suddenly blew through my weekly Codex limit on $200 pro plan overnight. Did leave 1 goal running, but never gotten anywhere the near the limit before (not sure even seen below 90%), to see it wiped overnight seems weird. Anyone else seeing the same? @thsottiaux
@danshipper Had no idea. That’s going to open up some really cool use cases. I barely need to switch out of the codex app for anything these days😅. It may as well be the desktop.
The Codex app has improved by orders of magnitude over the last couple of months. It's now extremely close to a 'one tool to rule them all'.
Even migrated a large chunk of claw functionality over to codex automations now we have locked screen use and remote connections.
@FPL__Raptor I’ve never understood the whole onfield antics thing. What are people even talking about? All I’ve ever seen is someone who really seems to care and gets frustrated when his teammates lack desire / ability. And I’m an Arsenal fan, so negative bias 😅
@trq212 I use claude code on three machines (all normally on the same ip, a local server, mac mini desktop and macbook) - recently i'm having to login all the time when I switch machines, never a problem before. Is this expected?
Convex @convex is an absolute game changer for people spinning up a bunch of AI prototypes with a backend requirement. Free tier is unbelievably generous too. Migrating everything over. (h/t @theo for the recommendation)
Great product from @danshipper and the @every team here, working in what might be the most interesting space in software right now.
The “death of SaaS” and rise of purely agent-driven workflows are in vogue, but the real design space might be in the middle, where humans and agents collaborate together in their preferred interface.
We've seen this in coding, now the net is widening.
BREAKING:
Proof—a new product from @every
It’s a live collaborative document editor where humans and AI agents work together in the same doc. It's fast, free, and open source—available now at https://t.co/OZeW6Wf1Iq.
It’s built from the ground up for the kinds of documents agents are increasingly writing: bug reports, PRDs, implementation plans, research briefs, copy audits, strategy docs, memos, and proposals.
Why Proof?
When everyone on your team is working with agents, there's suddenly a ton of AI-generated text flying around—planning docs, strategy memos, session recaps. But the current process for collaborating and iterating on agent-generated writing is…weirdly primitive.
It mostly takes place in Markdown files on your laptop, which makes it reminiscent of document editing in 1999.
Proof lets you leave .md files behind.
What makes Proof different?
- Proof is agent-native: Anything you can do in Proof, your agent can do just as easily.
- Proof tracks provenance: A colored rail on the left side of every document tracks who wrote what. Green means human, Purple means AI.
- Proof is login-free and open source: This is because we want Proof to be your agent's favorite document editor.
Check it out now, for free—no login required:
https://t.co/NTVY3Nh8A6
@FPL_Harry As a British guy living in Japan, it’s great to watch the evolution of someone’s else experience playing FPL in this time zone in real time! 😂
My read on the bill was v different so can someone smarter help me understand...
+ the bill doesn't ban tokenized equities, just regulates them like securities. Limits what you can do on-chain bc of AML/KYC rules but that seems pretty normal, no?
+ there does seem to be some grey area around DeFi, but if you're a non-decentralized app that follows basic operating rules like treasury sanctions you should be ok and don't need AML/KYC on all your users. I expect this to get more clarity over time and litigated through real-world implementation
+ Leaves it to the SEC to determine what is a security, but then regulation goes to the CFTC. I don't think this erodes the CFTC's authority...
+ The bill allows for rewards on deposits, but doesn't call it yield because that would open up a can of worms related to banking laws. From a technical standpoint, yield on USDC and other stablecoins operates more as "rewards" on USD deposits elsewhere, so I don't see what the issue is with this language since it defacto provides users return on holdings
Would love some help understanding the crux of these issues, as they are very important!
@brian_armstrong@SenatorTimScott@SenLummis@NeerajKA