@circle This idiot thinks he can charge a tax for being the platform of choice for stablecoins but bear no responsibility or duty of care to its users and depositors. Sue these a-holes into oblivion @circle@jerallaire
@Cointelegraph I don’t know how but after letting DPRK walk with $285mm in user deposits, it’s almost obvious this dude is captured by the CCP in some way
@circle $CRCL should be changed to $CUCK. They like to sit in the corner and watch hackers fck their users while doing nothing about it @zachxbt@circle
@circle You dummies fumbled the ball at the one yard line! You had the high confidence Stablecoin market locked and @tether just picked you off and is running it back! @jerallaire nice job!
@circle@tboypod@jerallaire Who wants to place a bet that these guys have some back door agreement to allow North Koreans to ride their platform for hack monetization in exchange for not being hacked themselves? @circle
@GabGrowth how sustainable is a business that freezes 6 private wallets in the morning worth pennies, then decides not to freeze obviously malicious hacked wallets a few hours later?
@jerallaire Hey @jerallaire, why was @Circle able to freeze 16 wallets for a private civil dispute on April 1st, but sat on its hands for 6 hours while $230M was drained through YOUR OWN CCTP bridge? Selective protection isn't neutrality—it's negligence. You've broken user trust irreparably
@SolanaFloor@jerallaire@circle@solace_fm Choosing the hard way. @circle deserves to be sued and lose. You don't get all the good and none of the bad about being a major centralized trusted partner.
@mdudas@circle is showing its colors. Instead of owning an obligation and mistake, they try to deflect and defend the hill they'll die on. It's early days in stablecoin land and it's these moments protocols die
@solananew@jerallaire major gross negligence by @circle. They should and will get sued civilly for this failure. The debate is whether @CFTC should look at potential criminal participation here by circle and DPRK hackers