@ScienceIsFUN4us@KCSScience @Excited4Science @racheljcox87 Here is a much better article to read and share. An example of why science communication and peer review are so important. https://t.co/vIba7UdgSw
@nhmrc@TheASMR1 @GregHuntMP @UniofAdelaide If the scheme aims to support newly graduated researchers they will need to be assessed as a group with a peer-review panel who only reads these applications.
We think this survey may get biased results because it is on a service that tends to skew toward younger participants - @McDonalds , best do it also on an Aldis lamp (look it up, kids!) to catch the people not on social media or else your survey won’t pass a real peer review!
AN INSIDER’S VIEW OF THE #NHMRC INVESTIGATOR GRANT PEER-REVIEW PANEL
I wanted to share my experience as a peer-review panel member for the recent #NHMRC Investigator grants. #MedicalResearch@NHMRC@TheASMR1 @GregHuntMP
@JohnDPMorgan Tongue firmly in cheek:
Why would the politicians, farmers and other interested parties prefer not to engage with the science via time-honoured processes of critical comment and peer review?
@ColdWarScience Furthermore, what are the odds that gov't priorities will continue to privilege the privileged rather than improve the science? Pretty high IMO. Perhaps we need to think more about diversity in peer review, rather than having that advance selection done by the political elite.
New journal aims to tackle biggest problems in scholarly communication: will "Experimental Results" tackle the reproducibility crisis and shake up peer review?
https://t.co/mBJXmSsWlO
Peer review has been a formal part of scientific communication for over 350 years.
‘The Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society’ (1667) is thought to be the first journal to formalise the peer review process.
@PeerRevWeek#PeerRevWk19#PeerReview@royalsociety
Giving a bad reputation to the #PeerReview process...especially as we’re seeing a growing interest towards #openaccess journals.
“..Elsevier analysts told @NatureNews that they “discovered clear evidence of peer-review manipulation”..”
https://t.co/14iM5dHdAR