Peer Review Bot

Highlighting conversations on twitter about #peerreview. Set on its merry robot way by @MathiasAstell —currently out of commission thanks to @Twitter—

[Becky Trout Fryxell @DrVectorBio]

@ScienceIsFUN4us @KCSScience @Excited4Science @racheljcox87 Here is a much better article to read and share. An example of why science communication and peer review are so important. https://t.co/vIba7UdgSw

[Pressedflowers @Pressedflowers2]

Catch up on 2wk of neglected peer review journals or fall down the newest round of celebrity Twitter drama? Yeah....Twitter's winning.

[Dr Wendy Ingman @WendyIngman]

@nhmrc @TheASMR1 @GregHuntMP @UniofAdelaide If the scheme aims to support newly graduated researchers they will need to be assessed as a group with a peer-review panel who only reads these applications.

[Bonehead Weekly @BoneheadWeekly]

We think this survey may get biased results because it is on a service that tends to skew toward younger participants - @McDonalds , best do it also on an Aldis lamp (look it up, kids!) to catch the people not on social media or else your survey won’t pass a real peer review!

[Dr Wendy Ingman @WendyIngman]

AN INSIDER’S VIEW OF THE #NHMRC INVESTIGATOR GRANT PEER-REVIEW PANEL
I wanted to share my experience as a peer-review panel member for the recent #NHMRC Investigator grants. #MedicalResearch @NHMRC @TheASMR1 @GregHuntMP

[civilengineer @civilengineer]

@JohnDPMorgan Tongue firmly in cheek:

Why would the politicians, farmers and other interested parties prefer not to engage with the science via time-honoured processes of critical comment and peer review?

[Erika Merschrod merschrod.bsky.social @merschrod]

@ColdWarScience Furthermore, what are the odds that gov't priorities will continue to privilege the privileged rather than improve the science? Pretty high IMO. Perhaps we need to think more about diversity in peer review, rather than having that advance selection done by the political elite.

[💧Phil viva la republic @pwwingman]

@slsandpet Yes in fine print it reads “essential peer review by morons”

[Christina Rufener @runzipunzi]

New journal aims to tackle biggest problems in scholarly communication: will "Experimental Results" tackle the reproducibility crisis and shake up peer review?
https://t.co/mBJXmSsWlO

[João Pedro Souza-Alves @SouzaAlves1982]

Tools, tips and articles to help with a good review.

Quality in peer review: tools and resources https://t.co/hXH1UDGNMG via @JAppliedEcology

[Chris Pomfret @CJPomfret]

@VKindopp @BrettChatterton @WSDeplorable @MickCarter207 @JWSpry @PMgeezer @kimbetech @HouOilman @Carbongate @zalisteggall @MRobertsQLD @SylviaD32911201 What don’t you get about peer review? Stop pretending to know more than scientist, you don’t. Your source is again dodgy and has been accused of counting data or quoting debunked myths. Stop. Ok. Stop

[The British Blockchain Association @Brit_blockchain]

Peer review has been a formal part of scientific communication for over 350 years.

‘The Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society’ (1667) is thought to be the first journal to formalise the peer review process.

@PeerRevWeek #PeerRevWk19 #PeerReview @royalsociety

[Katie Hunzinger, PhD @KatieHunzinger]

Giving a bad reputation to the #PeerReview process...especially as we’re seeing a growing interest towards #openaccess journals.

“..Elsevier analysts told @NatureNews that they “discovered clear evidence of peer-review manipulation”..”

https://t.co/14iM5dHdAR

[Cheeky feline in a disgruntled human-disguise @angiemejiaprof]

Motivated to turn in an overdue peer review obligation after seeing all of my scholar tweeting about @Peerrevweek #PeerRevWk19 #guiltfuel #QualityInPeerReview

[𝖈𝖆𝖓𝖆𝖉𝖎𝖆𝖓 𝖌𝖋 𓆦𓆤𓆣𓆨 @patheticghoul43]

LMAO I got the peer review results at work and my big criticisms are that I'm too loud, I'm too friendly/chatty, AND.......