The TurboQuant paper (ICLR 2026) contains serious issues in how it describes RaBitQ, including incorrect technical claims and misleading theory/experiment comparisons.
We flagged these issues to the authors before submission. They acknowledged them, but chose not to fix them. The paper was later accepted and widely promoted by Google, reaching tens of millions of views.
Weโre speaking up now because once a misleading narrative spreads, it becomes much harder to correct. Weโve written a public comment on openreview (https://t.co/nDVjmNhATM).
We would greatly appreciate your attention and help in sharing it.
Iโm so tired of writing rebuttals to this kind of โlack of noveltyโ review: โThis paper trivially combines A, B, and C, so the algorithmic novelty is limited.โ
Technically, most (if not all) robotics papers are convex combinations of existing ideas.
I still deeply appreciate A+B+C papersโespecially when they deliver:
- New capabilities: the โtrivial combinationโ unlocks behaviors we simply couldnโt achieve before
- Sensible & organic design: A+B+C is clearly the right compositionโnot some arbitrary Aโฒ+B+Cโฒ
- Nontrivial interactions: careful analysis of the dynamics, coupling, or failure modes between A, B, C
- Rehabilitating old ideas: A was dismissed for years, but paired with modern B/C, it suddenly worksโand teaches us why
- System-level & "interface" insight: the contribution is not any single piece, but how the pieces talk to each other
- Scaling laws or regimes: identifying when/why A+B+C works (and when it doesnโt)
- Engineering clarity: making something actually work robustly in the real world is not โtrivialโ
- New problem formulations: sometimes the real novelty is in the reformulationโonly under this view does A+B+C make sense.
Maybe worth keeping these in mind when reviewing the next A+B+C paper : )
๐ฅณ 3DV2026 is almost there!
๐ฃ We are at ๐ฃ๐ผ๐๐๐ฒ๐ฟ ๐ฆ๐ฒ๐๐๐ถ๐ผ๐ป ๐ฎ ๐๐ผ๐บ๐ผ๐ฟ๐ฟ๐ผ๐ ๐ฎ๐ณ๐๐ฒ๐ฟ๐ป๐ผ๐ผ๐ป!
๐ค Come discuss the opportunities for applying interactive digital twins in robotics!
#3DV2026#AI#ComputerVision#DigitalTwin#Robotics
๐Our new work, "iTACO: Interactable Digital Twins of Articulated Objects from Casually Captured RGBD Videos" got accepted to 3DV 2026!
๐กExisting methods for reconstructing articulated objects often require significant human effort to align all views to the same coordinate system. We instead propose building digital twins of articulated objects from casually captured RGBD videos, which is much more practical and scalable.
๐กWe therefore propose iTACO, a training-free pipeline for building digital twins of articulated objects from casually captured RGBD videos.
๐กAt the same time, we build a large dataset for robust benchmarking, which contains 20x more objects than existing datasets.
๐ชฉThe full dataset and source code are released. Visit our website for more details: https://t.co/NBTGBDeQVF
๐ฃ ๐๐ ๐๐ฟ๐ฎ ๐ฏ๐ผ๐ป๐๐ ๐ณ๐ผ๐ฟ ๐ฏ๐๐ฉ ๐ฎ๐๐๐ฒ๐ป๐ฑ๐ฒ๐ฒ๐!
๐ ๐ก๐ผ ๐๐ฒ๐ฝ๐ฎ๐ฟ๐ฎ๐๐ฒ ๐ฟ๐ฒ๐ด๐ถ๐๐๐ฟ๐ฎ๐๐ถ๐ผ๐ป ๐ผ๐ฟ ๐ฒ๐ ๐๐ฟ๐ฎ ๐ณ๐ฒ๐ฒ ๐ป๐ฒ๐ฒ๐ฑ๐ฒ๐ฑ, ๐ท๐๐๐ ๐ฐ๐ผ๐บ๐ฒ ๐ถ๐ณ ๐๐ผ๐ ๐ต๐ฎ๐๐ฒ ๐ฟ๐ฒ๐ด๐ถ๐๐๐ฒ๐ฟ๐ฒ๐ฑ ๐ฏ๐๐ฉ!
โจ Come to discuss and share ๐ฟ๐ฒ๐๐ฒ๐ฎ๐ฟ๐ฐ๐ต ๐ท๐ผ๐๐ฟ๐ป๐ฒ๐๐, ๐ถ๐ป๐๐ถ๐ด๐ต๐๐, ๐ฎ๐ป๐ฑ ๐ธ๐ฒ๐ ๐ฏ๐ฟ๐ฒ๐ฎ๐ธ๐๐ต๐ฟ๐ผ๐๐ด๐ต๐ ๐ถ๐ป ๐ฏ๐ with leading researchers in this field. Particularly if you are (under)graduate students and want to do great research, definitely come join us!
How AI looks like in 1948?
When mentioning Alan Turing, the first thing that comes to mind may be the Turing Test. But before Turing proposed the Turing Test in 1950, he presented an idea of a mathematical model of building AI, which I believe all modern AI approaches we have developed do not go beyond the scope of that model.
I put down my thoughts on this paper in the blog post: https://t.co/4PSS9UPj9S
Also, I highly recommend everyone to read the original paper: https://t.co/oPiEEfGeMW
Enjoy reading and feel free to discuss with me!
For a long time, Yann LeCun and others believed in gradient-based planning, but it didnโt work very well โฆ until now. Hereโs how we did it using incredibly simple techniques. But first, an introduction to gradient-based planning: ๐งต1/11
๐Our new work, "iTACO: Interactable Digital Twins of Articulated Objects from Casually Captured RGBD Videos" got accepted to 3DV 2026!
๐กExisting methods for reconstructing articulated objects often require significant human effort to align all views to the same coordinate system. We instead propose building digital twins of articulated objects from casually captured RGBD videos, which is much more practical and scalable.
๐กWe therefore propose iTACO, a training-free pipeline for building digital twins of articulated objects from casually captured RGBD videos.
๐กAt the same time, we build a large dataset for robust benchmarking, which contains 20x more objects than existing datasets.
๐ชฉThe full dataset and source code are released. Visit our website for more details: https://t.co/NBTGBDeQVF
๐ขStill struggling with building digital twins of articulated objects in your robotics project? Try our new method for producing replicas of articulated objects with casually captured RGBD videos!! All you need is just an iPhone with LiDAR.
๐ชฉwebsite: https://t.co/jkSJWVNnN1