My 74 father-in-law sat down with a bottle and told me the TRUTH.
Our mothers' generation were doing the SAME shit. The only difference is there was no Instagram to record it.
He left his first wife - cheating.
Second wife - cheating.
And the CRAZIEST one - his ex-wife cheated on him, left him, gave ANOTHER man his son.
He only found out because her own cousin snitched and said "that kid with your ex-wife's new man looks just like you."
He went and saw the kid. His blood. Another man raising his son thinking it's his.
This is 51 years ago years ago. No phones. No social media.
They were cheating with neighbors, with bosses. The only way you caught them was if you came home unannounced or a neighbor told you.
So don't give me this "women back then were loyal" fantasy. They were just better at HIDING it.
Modern women are not worse. Their cheating is just TELEVISED.
He was writing this as Francine, his wife, was having her brain electrocuted to rot in a psychiatric hospital, driven into depression by his constant infidelity, especially this affair. Pinterest intellectualism, ruled by women, ten billion likes, dark academia, fawns and poetry.
baudrillard’s work on disneyland says: disneyland exists as an “obvious fake” in order to imply that the world outside it is real. that’s what the idea below is, in reverse: there’s a real world out there if you “log off” (not possible), so, dont worry, the internet is all fake.
Japoneses não passaram por trovadorismo e cortesia, não leram Dante e Petrarca. O amor romântico foi introduzidos a eles tardiamente, no século XIX, mas eles entenderam e, agora que o Ocidente que lhes apresentou o conceito regride a um cinismo bestial, preservam a velha chama.
“Ever since I fumbled us, I’ve pretty much only had sex with girls everyone says look exactly like you. I finally found one I really like and I think I’m gonna date her
Just wanted to let you know I’m not imagining you while I’m with her or anything weird like that”
This is, bar none, the worst thing I have ever read. I have known about the Rape Gangs longer than a lot of americans, but even I did not grasp the scope or scale of what went on. Forget about Epstein, this was a crime against humanity on the scale of the Holocaust, of the Khmer Rouge, or of the lsraeIi atrocities in Gaza.
This was the systematic, intentional, targeted kidnapping, rape, torture and murder of White, Christian girls in England, specifically chosen due to their race and religion.
11 year olds had their vaginal walls used as bottle openers, and were then forced to consume the alcohol. Girls were raped with car keys and and baseball bats. 12 year olds with whiskey bottles inserted into their anus and smashed. Pre-teens raped by dogs.
The NHS is complicit. The British police is complicit. Damn near every single british politician over the past thirty years is complicit. The media is complicit. Anyone who ran cover for this must be put to death following a tribunal.
Nothing short of the public executions of tens, if not hundreds, of thousands of people, followed by the deportation of millions more is sufficient. Nothing will provide justice; that is the scale of the action required to merely get this to stop.
Women want to be raped and dominated but also loved and cherished but only when they feel like it by a partner they don’t even like most of the time but also witnessed and validated by lots of strangers while wearing a veil of soft innocence but also be openly perverse
> be a modern woman
> get driven insane by modern beauty/fashion standards created by gay men
> make no attempt to exit the system, find healthier modes of life, cure insanity
> double down on insane consumerism, feminism, sexual revolution, LGBTQ+
> push your insanity into mainstream education, government, and the workplace
> take power and force men to play by your insane-gay rules
> men start going insane
> crow triumphantly: "How does it feel NOW to be as insane as we are? Not so pleasant, is it?"
> pump fists, high-fives in group chat, "girl power!"
> someone asks: "But now that everyone is insane, what do we do now?"
> shrug-shoulders, probably someone else should do something about that
> no one does. society crumbles
"According to Jesus we're supposed to turn the other cheek when we're hurt, right?"
"Yes. In Jesus' time, a person that backhanded your cheek was treating you as lesser. So you turn the other cheek, forcing them to strike you as an equal."
"What does that have to do with immigration?"
"The contention is that immigrants are allowed to treat us as lesser because they come from incompatible cultures and attack us. But we can't then tell them no, because that's 'racist'."
"That seems contrary to what Jesus taught."
"It is, and amazingly so. Non-Christians often seize on the idea that Jesus advocated for non-violence to tell Christians to shut up and take what's being done to them."
"Are you sure that's what Jesus taught? It's not like you could ask him personally. He predates you by a millennium, right?"
"Jesus makes the same point with the story of giving away your cloak, and with going the extra mile. In the latter's case, a Roman soldier could make an Israelite carry anything like a pack mule for up to a mile. It was a humiliation. But Jesus told them to carry it another mile, to treat the Roman as you would a friend, which would both shame them and force them to treat you as a person instead of a mule."
"What about the cloak?"
"When you're poor and living in an ancient society, your cloak is vital for getting through the cold nights. In Jesus' time, it was common to get around this by demanding the other person give you their shirt. But if you give them the cloak as well, it is a deliberate provocation: if they take the shirt and cloak, they will be shamed by the community."
"And... the good samaritan?"
"The point was the man who was a neighbor was not the priest or the Levite, but the one who showed mercy to his neighbor. It doesn't say 'everyone is your neighbor', in fact it states the opposite rather plainly. It's your actions that make you a neighbor, NOT your ethnicity."
"So, not everyone is your neighbor?"
"The neighbor shows mercy to those who have been hurt."
"What does that have to do with immigration?"
"Nothing. They've decided it means that you must allow immigrants to raid and attack you and treat you like garbage without retaliation of any sort. You can't even say 'stop it' without being declared racist."
"Then why did he bring up Christianity at all?"
"Because he's not a Christian and doesn't understand it."
Left wingers: See that guy who maintains a core public service? Let's beat the shit out of him. Then we'll go back to mom's condo and masturbate to our Che poster. We're the good guys.
Remember kids, Xbox was charging for online while the PS3 had online for free, then Sony realized you can charge people online for no reason, the Nintendo realize you can do the same thing
It does not go towards "upkeeping the servers" it goes to robbing you blind
This man represents an incredibly powerful facet of being a consumer that most companies never even considered, where a single encounter with it is STILL shaking the industry at its core.
The ability to straight-up look the developers in their face and say "No thanks."
A shocking amount of rhetoric from highly educated leftists can be defeated by a functionally retarded man stumbling into the room and asking “even Palestine? Even George Floyd??”