The misogynistic men are really going into meltdown at women standing up for their rights and saying 'no' to them, aren't they? Same as it ever was, of course, but these men now call themselves 'progressive'. Hatred of women continues, just repackaged.
One of the most depressing thing about the Paris riots is seeing distressed women painted as the villains of the piece. This isn't the only woman who has been singled out.
@MsBin117 The person you are talking about died in 2023, under the trans NHS policy you say you want to keep. Single sex policy was implemented in Oct 2026. What is it that you want?
I see @indiawilloughby is *still* lying in his bio about being "UK Woman of the Year 2023". He wasn't. To set the record straight -
"India Willoughby was nominated (one of several hundred attendees), not the overall or sole “UK Woman of the Year 2023” winner.(https://t.co/ardnSIO4Nd)
Key facts
- Contemporary reporting from outlets including *The London Economic*, *The Herald*, and others, plus Willoughby’s own writing at the time, consistently described it as a "nomination". Willoughby was nominated by a panel for campaign work and attended the Women of the Year Lunch and Awards on 16 October 2023 at the Royal Lancaster in London, along with more than 400 other [actual] women (https://t.co/ardnSIO4Nd)
- The organisation (Women of the Year) invites a large group of nominees each year. Its site states that each guest “is nominated by a member of the Women of the Year Nominating Council... attending the gathering as a ‘Woman of the Year’.” Specific awards (e.g. Lifetime Achievement, Campaign of the Year) are then given to a small number of people. The 2023 specific award winners included Baroness Hale, Merope Mills, Lisa Woodcock, and others—Willoughby was not among them.(https://t.co/hHSWgRiuvx)
- Willoughby’s current X/Twitter bio lists “UK Woman Of Year 2023.” This appears to be a shorthand or self-description of the nomination/invitation status that the event uses for its large group of attendees, rather than a claim of having won a singular top prize.
In short: nominated and invited as one of the many “Women of the Year” guests for the 2023 event, not awarded as the winner of the title in the sense of a sole or overall recipient."
The Prime Minister of the Netherlands is having a baby with a surrogate mother.
Given theirs is a country where women are sold in shop windows we shouldn’t be surprised.
imagine calling naomi cunningham, one of the most rational & clever women in the country 'evil' in public. still. he's moved on from hating jews from last week and now onto hating catholics. is there anyone or thing he doesn't hate these days?. x
This man died of late stage lymphoma back in 2023, and tr**nes are claiming the recent NHS decision to enforce single sex spaces in hospital for patients privacy is responsible for it.
And there's even a crowd fund.
Come on. Don't believe everything you see. People lie.
Sad case but nothing to do with the SC ruling or latest NHS guidance. If Willoughby bothered to check anything, he could have found out that this happened in October 2023.
Malta has gender self-ID, rapist men in women’s prisons, no abortions even in case of rape or the woman’s life is at risk, endemic corruption & a habit of assassinating journalists.
But sure: that’s the model he’d like us to follow if it lets him gets his cock out.
The amount of men angry about not getting to watch horrific things being done to women proves precisely why this shit must be banned. Each and every one of you are scum who shouldn't be allowed in decent society and I hope your cocks rot and fall off 👍👍
If the 'dolls' were real women, Corbett would be criticised from all sides for being a sexist pig, using outdated, infantilising and dehumanising language.
But because the 'dolls' are men who watch too much porn, he is applauded, even by women at a conference for teachers.