Advocate 4 common sense, less government, open free markets, personal accountability, consequences for bad actors; Not a fan of broad generalizations, tribalism
@dori_coin@earncoinpool@IOGroup Philosophically I agree At same time there is significant evidence to the contrary. 1) 11+ yrs & no meaningful adoption + far behind leading chains 2) Perverse incentives: IOG private co. w no transparency needs $ to survive - only incentive is to create LT roadmap & deliver a 👇
@dori_coin It’s clear current CH/IOG & FE model isn’t working + way too much dependency on IOG for core dev The cmmty would be well served to aggressively work toward minimizing that dependency so that a no confidence motion could be submitted & passed w a shift of core dev 2 an alt firm
@mr_cata I’m definitely a buyer at the first reversal sign that this 4 year downtrend is over! Looks like the first trigger will be when we clear 800 sats What you do you think happens first a break below 300 or a breakout above 800?
That's not the issue. I believe most people want the Founder to remain active, influential, and strong within the ecosystem. However, that should be accompanied by emotional stability, institutional conduct, and a willingness to engage with criticism and differing opinions.
Personal attacks do not contribute to finding solutions or strengthening the community. I've noticed that whenever community members express disagreement or raise legitimate concerns, they are often met with attacks. This creates the impression that criticism is being dismissed rather than addressed, or that pressure is being applied to secure funding without proper scrutiny.
No leader should be above questioning. The ability to listen to criticism, respond respectfully, and engage in self-reflection is essential for anyone in a position of influence within the ecosystem.
@CheekyCrypto@IOHK_Charles Yes that would be far better Although not with unfettered access to treasury There would need to be a compromise on some subsidy plus CH/IOG using their own funds to finish the job & deliver scaling, RealFi & BTC DeFi otherwise move to no confidence motion on current CC
@LeaderAlphaNews And 10k Dapps will appear on Cardano in December 2021 servicing 100s of Ms of users - the hyped up baseless proclamations about Cardano’s future are so tiresome- enough already - how about instead focus on small steps to remove blockers that have prevented any modicum of success
@Pledditor Charles is no more interested in the answer to his own question than Pinocchio is In case I’m wrong how about stop being an Ahole towards others, treat ppl they way you wanna be treated, don’t promise anything you can’t deliver, educate & make effort to grow vs shrink cmmty👇
@TheOCcryptobro@Ledger@IntersectMBO You’re hitting on the greatest value crypto has delivered to date It’s exclusively for wantrepreneurs & creators of tokens who get paid in advance & perpetually extract treasury $$ to fund opaque private biz at a profit in a quasi-regulated environment
There's little tech explanation on this Zcash vulnerability, very serious stuff
A soundness bug in their zero-knowledge proof circuit + sloppiness in their elliptic curve point handling code essentially allowed unlimited forged shielded transactions
That's gotta spook vendors!
@DeOpenSourceGuy@IOHK_Charles@phil_uplc If you agree his behavior has to change in order for C to thrive under his leadership curious how you blv the cmmty should go about driving that change? Specifics that will incite a serious attempt to change on his part will be appreciated
@TomDKirkpatrick@HiiiPowerRevo What viable solutions do you genuinely believe CH has? Sincerely curious on how you see it given is history of the way he treats ppl and his history of hype far greater than reality?
@DeOpenSourceGuy@IOHK_Charles@phil_uplc Fair enuf at same time wen the founder calls a cmmty member “garbage” after legitimately challenging him that’s where the evil starts & where the culture begins This is a pattern that’s been repeating for several years & too many in his circle of influence accept his behavior
@InputEndorsers When results are lacking AND leading personalities repeatedly mistreat & disrespect others while growing a cmmty is essential for success, that combo makes it virtually impossible to succeed
@CashAnvil It’s the same pattern though Using the C treasury to fund IOR to do research for other chains directly yields profits for IOG based on the investments of others who get no direct benefit and an unlikely indirect benefit
@CashAnvil@avaxricious@IOHK_Charles It’s very hard at this point not believing that that most of the harsh critics of Charles in the early days were right His emotional intelligence is in the range of a 9 year old
@CashAnvil@realdecimalist Perverse incentives at play unfortunately my friend It doesn’t matter who’s left as long as IOG can appear like they’re working on improving things for C the opaque nature of IOG allows them to continue operations that will shift are shifting heavily towards $NIGHT
@Defied_Investor@dori_coin@earncoinpool@IOGroup 100% been doing several of those things consistently since early 2018 Trouble is there’s an ever increasingly shrinking pool of people doing those things primarily because of 1)undelivered promises and 2) a toxic culture originating from the project’s founder
@AdamRusch@IOHK_Charles Charles has lost a massive amount of credibility Love this post from Adam! How will CH react? Will Adam become the next “piece of garbage” like @ItsDave_ADA became when he challenged CH just like so many other community members who have the stones to speak up? Your move Charles