@againstgrmrs The FREE RIDE of the so-called 'TRANS movement' on the LGB bandwagon is thankfully coming to an end as more and more people come to realise it is both *MISOGYNISTIC* and *HOMOPHOBIC*.
Really couldn't happen soon enough 🙄
https://t.co/9L45vy54ef
@ginnydmm Somehow our finest EDUCATIONAL institutions have produced a TIKTOK GENERATION.
Gullible, manipulable political LEMMINGS as BRAINWASHED as MAO’S students with their Little Red Books and just as full of misplaced righteousness.🙄
https://t.co/qtMwYbMizj
@HeidiBachram@Iouiserrington There is a deep MORAL ROT in Western society originating in the IDENTITY politics force-fed in liberal colleges & schools.
A TikTok Generation (aka USEFUL IDIOTS R'US) have the brains & moral sensibility of a shoal of piranha. 🤮
@HuntersOfNazis The time will come for every EVIL DEGENERATE who gloried in the OBSCENITIES of 7th October to pay for their CRIMES in this world & the next.
May they be cast into the blackest ABYSS of Al-Hawiyah to suffer eternally for the FOULNESS of their sins. Bismillah💀
Sally Rooney is a historically illiterate Irish airhead ! She is not unique, there are many like her.
She has absolutely no idea what she’s talking about. She’s just throwing around words like colonialism, fascism, regime and liberation because she thinks it makes her a “morale person” who stands for something.
But standing is when things don’t move. Movement is crucial if you want progress and modernity, two things that Palestinism does not offer. So all she’s really doing is standing there with her head in the clouds like an airhead, saying words and talking about something that she has no understanding of and feeling good about herself.
Sally Rooney: “The liberation of Palestine really does represent the liberation of the world.”
Someone really needs to explain to Sally that there has never been a country nation or sovereign established State called “Palestine.” Ever ! In the entire history of the world !!!
There is no such place as “Palestine.”
It is not on any map.
“Palestine” was a Roman idea that no longer exists. It was the Latin name that the Romans gave to the kingdom of Judea after they conquered it, to sever the Jewish peoples connection to the land and embarrass them.
Syria/Palestina to erase Judea.
The people who colonised it were Romans, Christians, Arabs and Muslims.
But in 1948 Jews got their ancestral homeland and country back from waves of colonial invaders when they won their war for independence after being attacked by Egypt, Iraq, Syria. Lebanon and Jordan.
Zionism is the ultimate decolonisation movement. Israel was decolonised by its indigenous people, the Jews.
After WW1, and within a period of just 16 years between 1932 - 1948, five countries were chiseled out of the ruins of the Ottoman Empire with randomly drawn borders and became independent and sovereign.
They are all legitimate:
Iraq – 1932.
Lebanon – 1946.
Jordan – 1946.
Syria – 1946.
Israel – 1948.
No “Palestine”
1. Before Israel, there was a British mandate, not a Palestinian state.
2. Before the British Mandate, there was the Ottoman Empire, not a Palestinian state.
3. Before the Ottoman Empire, there was the Islamic state of the Mamluks of Egypt, not a Palestinian state.
4. Before the Islamic state of the Mamluks of Egypt, there was the Ayubid-Kurdish Empire, not a Palestinian state.
5. Before the Ayubid Empire, there was the Crusader Frankish and the Christian Kingdom of Jerusalem, not a Palestinian state.
6. Before the Kingdom of Jerusalem, there were the Umayyad and Fatimid empires, not a Palestinian state.
7. Before the Umayyad and Fatimid empires, there was the Byzantine empire, not a Palestinian state.
8. there was the Sassanid-Persian Empire before the Byzantine Empire, not a Palestinian state.
9. Before the Sassanid-Persian Empire, there was the Byzantine Empire again, not a Palestinian state.
10. there was the Roman Empire, not a Palestinian state, before the Byzantine Empire.
11. Before the Roman Empire, there was the Jewish Hasmonean state, not a Palestinian state.
12. Before the Jewish Hasmonean state was the Hellenistic Seleucid Empire, not a Palestinian state.
13. Before the Hellenistic Seleucid empire, there was Alexander the Great's empire, not a Palestinian state.
14. Before Alexander the Great, there was the Persian Empire, not a Palestinian state.
15. Before the Persian Empire, there was the Babylonian Empire, not a Palestinian state.
16. Before the Babylonian Empire, the kingdoms of Israel and Judah were not Palestinian states.
17. Before the Kingdoms of Israel and Judah, there was the Kingdom of Israel, not a Palestinian state.
18. Before the Kingdom of Israel, there was the theocracy of the twelve tribes of Israel, not a Palestinian state.
There have been many rulers and governments there, but never a Palestine.
I’d really like it if Sally Rooney and her low grade thug followers would learn history, but more importantly, stop trying to colonise and Islamise Israel !!!
@wakeupusa They will be remembered, if at all, as representatives of a tragic GENERATION: groomed by BIG PHARMA to be obedient CASH COWS.
Already, the MEDICAL CLASS ACTIONS have started from STERILISED & MUTILATED kids with buyer's regret.
https://t.co/hvCwDTxz9J
The only option left to take with those disingenuous snakes still claiming a genocide in Gaza, in the face of all available evidence, is cold, hard contempt.
Let’s remind ourselves of truth and facts.
The definition of genocide:
“intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnical, racial or religious group.”
And the component parts:
“1A mental element: the "intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnical, racial or religious group, as such"; and
2A physical element, which includes the following five acts, enumerated exhaustively:
- Killing members of the group
- Causing serious bodily or mental harm to members of the group
- Deliberately inflicting on the group conditions of life calculated to bring about its physical destruction in whole or in part
- Imposing measures intended to prevent births within the group
- Forcibly transferring children of the group to another group.”
Firstly, intent. Nowhere, anywhere, has anyone shown evidence of a clear plan to destroy all Gazans. South Africa’s joke of an ICJ case cites a variety of punchy statements from Israeli politicians and soldiers as evidence of intent. Most of these submissions were from people *nowhere near* policy making and - critically - armies do not take orders from press conferences.
Speeches by policy makers have been taken out of context, the old crowd favourite being “Amalek”. But look at what Netanyahu went on to say in that speech:
“In their name and on their behalf, we have gone to war, the purpose of which is to destroy the brutal and murderous Hamas-ISIS enemy, bring back our hostages and restore the security to our country, our citizens and our children.”
It’s obvious what he meant. Factor in the horror of the events of 7 October, and, frankly, you can’t blame Israeli politicians for sounding pissed off, or the utility of threatening an enemy in wartime.
The other half of the equation is action on the ground. We can dismiss preventing births, and we can disregard forcible transfer of children. Even Israel’s critics don’t accuse them of that.
So the other three: of course, people have been killed. Of course, bodily and mental harm will have been caused. This is a war. The key question is how and why?
Hamas fighters are legitimate targets. Israel has killed 15-20k Hamas fighters, with many more wounded. Hamas omits this in their weekly casualty figures (which, of course, don’t stand up to the merest statistical scrutiny). We can safely take Hamas’ reported “40k dead civilians” and bring that total down to 5-15k at most. Still many people; still a tragedy.
But is it legal? Well, that depends on Israeli targeting. Were those civilians legally collateral damage? I don’t know and you don’t know. However: we also have documented and unquestionable Israeli attempts to remove civilians from the areas they are attacking. For example, they delayed the assault on Gaza City until a million people had fled South. That, I suggest, is not the action of an armed force determined to “destroy in whole or in part”.
So, we turn to “Deliberately inflicting on the group conditions of life calculated to bring about its physical destruction in whole or in part”. Even Hamas’ 40k dead civilians, out of 2.4m, disprove this - and as I’ve argued, it’s probably 10k or fewer if you look at the stats.
We’re 10 months in. The conditions, whilst clearly appalling for Gazan civilians, are demonstrably not bringing about physical destruction to any greater extent than one would expect in a war zone of this nature and even the most recent reports say there is no famine.
No intent; no action: no genocide.
Be appalled at dead civilians: that is the correct human response, although civilians are always the greatest victims of war.
But the deepest shame on those who disregard all available evidence and twist facts to cynically and evilly weaponise the worst crime in history, by accusing its historical victims of being its modern perpetrators.
@frad1957@HonestReporting When our MAINSTREAM MEDIA, for whatever reason, colludes in creating a false PUBLIC CONSENSUS of what is "TRUTHFUL" out of LIES, DISTORTIONS and blatant PROPAGANDA, it becomes incredibly hard to change public perception.
Sadly, that's where we are now. 🙄
@Israelkicksass Parroting MADE UP figures supplied by HAMAS in support of a MADE UP narrative invented by HAMAS is not the winning ARGUMENT many people imagine.
But when MAINSTREAM MEDIA platforms do it, it's fckng inexcusable. 😡https://t.co/4CBBara9Jv