@micsolana But he called to one professor and promised to maybe apologize some day
And allowed in the same call the professotรคr to criticize him
Youbare too quick to judge!
Makes me so crazy that someone decided to build trains with too little space. If you are going to spend tens of millions on trains, make them at least good.
@l3s6vr9 I love how estonia is subsidying their software engineers by doubling their pre-tax salary
All countries should take the same approach and to all income
@Briankeating@micsolana And as you are facing the heat from the Threads people you have to come to publicly defend Scott?
You even said he is gracious enough to let you criticize him. What a joke!
@Briankeating@micsolana He said it twice, in two different podacasts, and comes out after there is financial and reputational backlash to him.
There is no way it is an accident and you are a joke to bend over for him.
@micsolana "Despite disagreeing with my criticism, Scott offered to defend my academic freedom and my right to criticize him."
That was the craziest part. Prof. Keating is happy to keep his job and needs to publicly come to defend his bully.
@fuchsdanielt@Briankeating@peterboghossian@profgalloway The point that Galloway allowed Keating to critirize him is just amazing. Anything else would be totalitarian and just the idea to post about it and think it is generous is ridiculous
It is not an honest mistake from Galloway to go say the thing twice in public appearances
He said it twice in two different public appearances. He coming back to you (and others), crying about how people misunderstand him, when shit hits the fan makes him a worse person, not better
UPDATE: Scott Galloway reached out to me earlier today and asked me to call him. I'm glad I did.
I've read @profgalloway's books, listened to his podcasts, and appreciated his willingness to confront campus antisemitism and debate people he vigorously disagrees with, including @BenShapiro with comity (and more than a little comedy).
That's why his recent comments about Elon Musk surprised and troubled me.
My central criticism was that Scott called Musk a "traitor to the West" while invoking Julius and Ethel Rosenberg, who were executed for espionage.
I think it was a careless statement, but I don't think Scott is calling for Musk's execution. Too many people on this platform are making that accusation, but it's an oversimplification. He told me he explicitly opposes capital punishment. I still believe the analogy was overblown.
We also discussed what actually happened with Starlink and Starshield in Ukraine. What was restricted, when, by whom, and under whose authority? I agree with him that we need to know what actually happened for transparency's sake. Sunlight is the best disinfectant.
Scott acknowledged that if Musk was legitimately enforcing a commercial agreement, not meddling in wartime policies as a private citizen, the accusation of treachery would be unwarranted. I hope that if that occurs, he will retract it publicly.
We agree that serious accusations require serious evidence.
I raised Scott's role as a UC Regent because I believe those entrusted with governing the best university on the planet deserve particular scrutiny. I never called for his removal, nor do I want him removed.
Scott explained why that framing troubled him. I listened, and I understand his concerns better.
Despite disagreeing with my criticism, Scott offered to defend my academic freedom and my right to criticize him.
As a professor, I teach students to revise their conclusions when confronted with new evidence. Today I was reminded that professors must also reconsider their own approach, too.
I stand by the substance of my criticism. But my tone should have been more collegial.
Our conversation strengthened my respect for Scott's generosity and commitment to the University of California, a system that transformed both our lives. As a two-time native son of the UC system, I think Scott will play a vital role on that august board.
Lastly, and most remarkably, two podcast hosts managed to have a contentious discussion and find common ground without recording another podcast about it.
A first in (unrecorded) history.
@Briankeating@profgalloway He said it twice in two different public appearances. He coming back to you (and others), crying about how people misunderstand him, when shit hits the fan makes him a worse person, not better
@Michael_Druggan@1thousandfaces_ Generational wealth usually needs multiples of that as there is supposed to be more descendants than one that need to live off in the next generation
And even more in the one after that...
@beffjezos You should bever donate to them anyways
Not even going into their editorial decisions, they actively are trying to mold the world to fit their worldview
They spend 1/3 of their money on funding NGOs