Assistant Professor @LehighBusiness | Lecturer @HarvardExt
I study bias in orgs, politics, and law.
formerly @SBUPoliSc @PsychHarvard @CSPPUM @JohnJayCollege
Does providing personalized feedback about implicit bias lead to increased awareness and change in attitudes or behavior?
In a recent paper, in Journal of Experimental Social Psychology (@ELSpsychology), Gordon Moskowitz and I address this question.
https://t.co/YIc9iqxvNd
(1/7)
I’m excited to share that our election legitimacy data brief is now available online! @Prof_Vitriol@CFarhart and I put together two great panel datasets with plenty of measures on perceived electoral legitimacy and political attitudes and behavior! https://t.co/ZbT1SOMUby
We’re building the Group Dynamics & Social Change Lab at Lehigh University! Our research explores the psychology of social change, combining computational and empirical methods and collaborating with local and global communities—stay tuned for updates!
https://t.co/Yi1S2ixFx2
Why are some American racial/ethnic groups seen as more "American"? In a new paper w/ @TesCharlesworth@thdevos & @banaji, we explore predictors of the American=White/Asian=Foreign stereotype and whether stereotypes have dropped over the past 17 years https://t.co/rpQBLDx5no 1/n
@ALDragovich@basinmusic@mattyglesias yes. The market is largely supportive of DEI, and most companies and organizations are pursuing these policies precisely because of the competitive advantage it gives them.
@adrianbignyc1 @ramcdk@J0654275591881@mattyglesias It's literally an opinion-piece from a right-wing think tank. And it is not at all persuasive nor original, either.
@adrianbignyc1 @ramcdk@J0654275591881@mattyglesias These aren't studies, but diatribes published in right wing outlets. You use words you do not understand.
@adrianbignyc1 @J0654275591881@mattyglesias If you actually read those articles, instead of immediately dismissing anything that vaguely threatens your dogmatic worldview, you'd know that they are either peer-reviewed scientific papers or summaries of peer-reviewed scientific papers. But you're an unserious troll.
@smithkl42@moderatetex512@mattyglesias Everything I have said is well supported by empirical evidence. I encourage you to spend time learning about the topic, with an open mind, if you actually want to ground yourself in the "real world".
@smithkl42@moderatetex512@mattyglesias And also, the status quo clearly damages and hurts minorities already, and undermines the success of organizations, more generally. Bias and prejudice in the workplace are very real things that organizations would be remiss to ignore; doing so undermines their own interests.
@smithkl42@moderatetex512@mattyglesias DEI programs have widespread support in the general public:
https://t.co/ifGH2zmDFm
And, I have already shared sources demonstrating that DEI programs are needed, effective, and beneficial, for individuals and organizations, even if sometimes done poorly or shallowly.
@moderatetex512@smithkl42@mattyglesias What a bad faith interpretation of what I’ve said. That some programs are ineffective or poorly done does not at all mean these programs aren’t needed or can’t be done well. On the contrary, DEI is absolutely necessary for modern organizations and can be done well.
@BlatantlyDumb@smithkl42@mattyglesias Sure, I would love for DEI programs or really any policy change, in government or elsewhere, to be evaluated. But sadly, that is very costly and difficult, and time consuming and therefore very rare. This is not unique to DEI, nor government.
@J0654275591881@mattyglesias Absolutely. Just a handful below.
https://t.co/I59ICQLRaE
https://t.co/cIX39A50pt
https://t.co/fsWBTXPtMb
https://t.co/bJgXpWL8H2
@SF_Truth_Seeker@mattyglesias DEI programs, when done well, accomplish a lot, and are necessary for modern organizations to succeed, lead, and innovate. But effective DEI programs require more then good intentions and shallow, empty gestures.
@smithkl42@mattyglesias I doubt these federal programs have been subject to empirical evaluation. However, sometimes DEI programs fail or backfire in many orgs, for a variety of reasons, often because the programs lack meaningful support from leadership or are implemented in a shallow way.