@2_Cosmonautes L’allocation des récompenses semble être au choix de la chaine de consommation. A voir si les rendements sont semblables à ceux des pools de liquidités.
@octo_sed @zmanian Mi-figue mi-raisin. C’est quand même mieux que de l’USDC bridgé qui deviendra forcément de plus en plus présent. Les altenatives sont trop peu éprouvées ou juste en concept. Comme béquille oui, comme socle non, effectivement.
@DonCryptonium Indeed. Prop. 76 doesn’t solve anything and will not guarantee anything, at worst it damages the confidence and involvement of members within cosmos.
@gadikian @RobbStack_sats I find the eagerness surprising before a possibly modified atom 2.0 tokenomic announced at Cosmoverse 22. Why quickly change this before a bigger change ?
@SimplyStaking @catdotfish@cremonafran 5% seems completely arbitrary to me. Maybe 3 or 7% would be more adequate? The community must be able to refer and form an opinion. A number just for a number has no value. Not envious of your vision of governance. Thx @catdotfish.
What do you see here?
@StargazeZone dropped %25 of total supply $STARS
@osmosis dropped %50 of genesis supply $OSMO
@JunoNetwork dropped %47 of genesis supply $JUNO
@AssetMantle dropped %20 of genesis supply $MNTL
@CrescentHub dropped %50 of genesis supply $CRE
++
@Phil_RX Il y a l’air d’avoir de joli rendements mais je ne comprends pas trop leur système de cycle. Avec bFOT et gFOT et FOT… quelqu’un a creusé le sujet ?
@RobbStack_sats Agree with you, we are just starting a "synchronization" at this level. If it is restricted, it will only be a repetition of what already exists.
https://t.co/s3DERyVjsu
@Bessentiel @RobbStack_sats @CoinMarketCap I'm sure your investment strategies data do not stop at CoinMarketCap alone... Coingecko/mintscan/... were reliable. Mathematics on a false basis does not become true. Now the mistake can no longer be made by newcomers: good new.