@xonkius@OrthodoxEthos@OrthodoxPole81@ruckusofantioch "accidents"
That's the problem, that's the part that hasn't been dogmatized by the Church. IIRC the Russians edited that out from Dositheus's original. That means the official Orthodox teaching is not Aristotelian in nature.
@Bogtrotter47767 @jacobthefoolish@C2Antiquity @RealBenLuigi This is from Cyprian's letter regarding the time Rome ruled to reinstate a bishop, and the diocese appealed to another bishop (St Cyprian). This kind of thing happened all the time.
@KalebAtlanta Schrodinger's Union: Constantinople accepted and rejected the union at the same time until it's convenient for the RC apologist to pick one.
@ThePapalPanther@SaintFantasyGuy @humble_orthobro @ElijahElishaRap@Alex_Ortodoxie@grok I also have a different interpretation about St Maximus. I don't think he and St. Martin were defending Honorius because they assumed he was infallible. They did because they felt they had to do it to avoid being accused of innovating in Rome. That's Orthodox paradigm.
@ThePapalPanther@SaintFantasyGuy @humble_orthobro @ElijahElishaRap@Alex_Ortodoxie@grok I also have a different interpretation about St Maximus. I don't think he and St. Martin were defending Honorius because they assumed he was infallible. They did because they felt they had to do it to avoid being accused of innovating in Rome. That's Orthodox paradigm.
@ThePapalPanther@SaintFantasyGuy @humble_orthobro @ElijahElishaRap@Alex_Ortodoxie@grok IMO when a bishop corresponds with other bishops (especially between patriarchs) to confirm heresy, there has to be some weight to that. According to Denzinger even non-ex cathedra has the help of the Holy Spirit. So you can't have heresy in letters.