**Reply sentiment (from sampled top and latest replies, totaling dozens across multiple fetches):**
- **Opposed**: Overwhelming majority (~95–100% of visible replies). Common responses include “Yes we do,” “I do,” or statements preferring ICE at polling sites to prevent non-citizen voting and ensure election integrity. Many frame the post as speaking for “Americans” incorrectly or prioritizing illegal voting over citizen concerns.
- **Supportive**: Extremely rare to none in samples. Searches for agreement language (“agree,” “thank,” “correct,” “exactly”) returned mostly further opposition or unrelated points.
- **Indifferent**: Negligible. Most engagement is direct disagreement rather than neutral commentary.
With ~7,700 replies, the pattern is consistent across top-liked and recent ones: the conversation is dominated by pushback. Top individual replies (e.g., one with ~2,000 likes) explicitly reject the claim and cite illegal voting concerns.
**General reception based on metrics:**
The post has roughly 114k views and ~1,200 likes (≈1.05% like-to-view ratio), plus ~160 reposts, 226 quotes, and ~7,700 replies. A 1% like-to-view rate sits at the lower end of typical/average for many accounts (benchmarks often cite 1–3% as common/good, lower for larger accounts with broader reach). However, the extreme reply-to-like imbalance (~6.5 replies per like) is the stronger signal—classic “ratioed” territory, where replies far outpace likes. This typically indicates controversy, disagreement, and negative reception among those who engaged, rather than broad positive endorsement.
Popular posts usually show likes significantly exceeding replies with stronger positive engagement rates; unpopular or polarizing ones reverse that, drawing high reply volume from critics while likes stay muted. Here the distribution reached a decent audience (views) but the reaction was predominantly critical.
@PaulleyTicks The annoying part of this is that morons will believe it. Also, insinuating how ugly Susan Dell is after she donated over $6B to children shows how disgusting you people are. Fuck you.
@wendyp4545 What about this that want to avoid a return to Biden-esque government and therefore make as many positive changes as possible with each vote? How in the hell does going backward help the situation?
Nobody screamed for "Epstein files" before Trump took office. Do you really believe the last administration and their minions left all of the evidence intact? Trump was originally all for releasing the data but then seemingly changed his mind. I'm betting it was white washed and everything remaining is much worse for republicans than democrats.
@RepThomasMassie@SpeakerJohnson@SecWar The poll question is loaded and you know it. It's insinuating that Hegseth unilaterally started an illegal war. If you're so firmly on the high ground, why do you need to frame this in a way to persuade people to agree with your view?
@SKDoubleDub33 Is definitely fabricated. Just like the polls showing how overwhelmingly democrats will win the midterm elections. They do this stuff every time there's an election now to demoralize and reduce republican voter turnout.
@LydiaLedesma@unusual_whales Trump has never claimed that he didn't know Epstein. Can't you assclowns get any facts straight before blurting your nonsense?
This disgusting person participated in a scheme that ultimately robbed US taxpayers of ~$240M. We are expected to recover less than 25%. We also pay to investigate, try, and jail the criminals. Fraud is out of control across the nation yet this judge and liberals are so proud of handing out light sentences like this. People participating in these schemes should face denaturalizatiom and deportation.