Dr. Rabble

Board cert surgeon no longer fooled by the system. Anonymity keeps my job (already been warned about posting anything against CDC dogma) so changed my Handle.

[Dr. Rabble @Rabblerouser45]

@AndrewZywiecMD @GrtSeizuresGhst For real??

[Jonathan Cohler @cohler]

The Smoking Gun Fauci Ignored
And the Nobel Prize that NEVER should have been

On February 8, 2021, Drew Weissman emailed Anthony Fauci directly. Weissman is not the inventor of mRNA vaccines. He contributed the nucleoside modification that reduced innate immune activation of synthetic mRNA. That contribution addressed one problem. It did nothing to prevent biodistribution to the placenta, fetus, uterus, or ovaries.

His own email confirmed those exact failures.

He reported that mRNA-LNPs crossed the placenta and entered the fetus, translated the mRNA, and triggered an immune response in the amniotic fluid. In non-pregnant animals, the LNPs accumulated in the uterus and ovaries. He told Fauci he was withholding public release pending further studies.

Three weeks later, on March 1, 2021, he sent Fauci the human-dose intramuscular study in pregnant mice. His words: "We still have some concern over the data." Fauci forwarded it to John Mascola, the head of the NIH Vaccine Research Center, inside the hour. "Let us discuss."

Two days after the February 8 email, Fauci stood at a White House briefing and said there were "no red flags." Six months later he called vaccination in pregnancy "an easy call."

The email closes with a line that matters. "Thank you for doing the Rosenstiel award."

Fauci was participating in the award machinery around Weissman while sitting on evidence from Weissman that the product had the worst possible biodistribution profile a gene-directed therapeutic can have. He praised the honoree.

He did not mention what the honoree had just written to him.

He did not mention the VAERS signals already accumulating in the public system at magnitudes orders of magnitude beyond every prior withdrawal threshold in the history of vaccine safety monitoring.

RotaShield came off at roughly fifteen reports.
Swine flu 1976 was halted at a few hundred.
LYMErix at numbers in that range.

The mRNA products were logging hundreds of thousands of reports and tens of thousands of deaths, and no comparable action was taken.

The Rosenstiel citation from Fauci was one step in a pipeline.
The Lasker followed.
The Breakthrough Prize followed.
The Nobel followed in 2023.

No reasonable observer can claim the endorsements of the head of NIAID at each stage played no role in that trajectory.

Rand Paul's July 2026 release documents exactly this pattern of Fauci participating in the award-nomination ecosystem around NIH-funded scientists, including reciprocal arrangements that produced a million-dollar prize for Fauci himself.

The Nobel went to a contributor whose own private correspondence, two months into the rollout, was flagging placental and fetal transfer and ovarian uptake to the head of the agency responsible for the recommendation.

That agency head, Anthony Fauci, then publicly denied red flags, endorsed use in pregnancy, and helped elevate the contributor to the highest scientific honor in medicine.

The product should have been pulled by February 2021 on the VAERS signals alone. The Weissman email adds mechanistic corroboration from the person best positioned to know.

Neither triggered action.
The award ceremonies proceeded on schedule.

That is the record.

[Secretary Kennedy @SecKennedy]

Today, I sent a letter to SAGE Open Medicine requesting an explanation for its decision to append an expression of concern to the article, “Analysis of health outcomes in vaccinated and unvaccinated children: Developmental delays, asthma, ear infections and gastrointestinal disorders,” without publicly explaining the reasons for doing so.

Scientific journals have a responsibility to uphold transparency, protect research integrity, and defend academic freedom. The American people deserve a scientific process that is open, accountable, and worthy of their trust.

[Rasmussen Reports @Rasmussen_Poll]

"39,000 of those were deaths and of those deaths 24% occur on the day of the vaccination or within 1 or 2 days. 24% - which by the way just happens to be the same that a Rasmussen Poll pointed out ... that 24% of the American public believe THEY KNOW someone WHO DIED of the experimental gene therapy." - @SenRonJohnson

[Nicolas Hulscher, MPH @NicHulscher]

THREE U.S. STATES INTRODUCED LEGISLATION DECLARING COVID-19 mRNA INJECTIONS AS BIOLOGICAL WEAPONS OF MASS DESTRUCTION

1. Arizona HB 2974

2. Minnesota HF 3219

3. Tennessee SB 1949

mRNA shots have killed, injured, and disabled more people than 100+ Hiroshima nuclear attacks.

[Dr. Urso @richardursomd]

Correct!!

[Chris Martenson @chrismartenson]

This list from Toby Rogers has been living rent-free in my head. It's not like "they" got a few things right and a few things wrong, they got EVERYTHING wrong, which means this was intentional.

[#𝕎𝕒𝕣 ℍ𝕠𝕣𝕚𝕫𝕠���� @WarHorizon]

White House releases a website documenting whatever we have been saying for 6 years 🔥

Covid was Manmade Bioweapon.
Social distancing and mask rules were made up.

People who exposed this were censored by diffrent Govts and Big Tech Companies.

This should be the biggest news story on the planet right now.

[Cynical Publius @CynicalPublius]

My thoughts on today's ignominious performance in the Senate by "Doctor" Anthony Fauci are below.

Less than 900 words, please read if so inclined.

[Dr. Rabble @Rabblerouser45]

Yes!

[Kevin Bass @kevinnbass]

Emails show leading officials at NIH, including Fauci, knew the best data indicated no benefit from masks.

Why did they proclaim great benefits of masks then?

Because these officials were not managing a virus using science.

They were managing a population using psychology.

[Kevin Bass @kevinnbass]

Emails show leading officials at NIH, including Fauci, knew the best data indicated no benefit from masks.

Why did they proclaim great benefits of masks then?

Because these officials were not managing a virus using science.

They were managing a population using psychology.

[Dr. Rabble @Rabblerouser45]

@JenniferSey I’m sorry you are feeling this way. I think you did the right thing and people did listen to you, so you probably helped a lot of people along the way. I understand that doesn’t bring back what you lost, but you stood up for right!!! That means something!!

[Dr. Rabble @Rabblerouser45]

@MaryBowdenMD Well, let’s hope it’s for the right reason and it explodes even more tomorrow!

[Dr. Rabble @Rabblerouser45]

@BAWilliamson55 @MaryBowdenMD Was she pardoned as well?

[Dr. Rabble @Rabblerouser45]

@afshineemrani I agree with everything but the statin piece. Risks outweigh benefits unless known MI history. And even then I’m beginning to doubt the veracities of those studies as well.

[Amarillo @anyelamarillo]

🚨 ELON MUSK ACABA DE SOLTAR LA BOMBA QUE NADIE QUIERE ESCUCHAR 🚨

El tipo que manda cohetes a Marte, inventa autos que se manejan solos y está creando la IA más avanzada del planeta… acaba de decir algo que te va a dejar frío:

“Normalmente soy el primero en defender la tecnología… pero estoy diciendo claro: NO debería existir ni una sola máquina de votar.”

Punto final. Sin vueltas. Sin diplomacia.

Las urnas electrónicas ya no son el futuro.
Son una puerta abierta al desastre.
Con la inteligencia artificial creciendo a ritmo de locura, cualquier sistema digital puede ser hackeado, alterado o controlado en silencio. Nadie se enteraría hasta que el daño ya esté hecho.
No es una película de Hollywood. Es exactamente lo que Musk ve venir… y es el único con el valor de gritarlo.

La única forma real de proteger las elecciones es tan simple que duele:
✅ Boleta de papel
✅ Voto en persona
✅ Identificación obligatoria

Todo lo demás es regalar el poder a quien sepa manipular un código.

Musk no es un político de discurso vacío.
Es el hombre que más entiende de tecnología real en 2026.
Y su mensaje es brutal:
O volvemos al papel… o perdemos el control de la democracia para siempre.
No esperes a que sea tarde.
Comparte esto ahora.
Exige boletas de papel.
Exige voto presencial con ID.
Exige elecciones que nadie pueda hackear.
El futuro de tu voto está en juego.
Hoy.

[Senator Rand Paul @SenRandPaul]

1/9 — My investigation uncovered that Anthony Fauci kept a diary.
What he wrote privately and what he told the country are two different stories.

Today I'm releasing his entries from December 2019 through December 2022. 🧵

[Dr. Rabble @Rabblerouser45]

@Fynnderella1 That would definitely be a way to eliminate the control group!

[Dr. Rabble @Rabblerouser45]

Unbelievable! I hope the Supreme Court reverses it. I don’t see how that can be anything but a violation of their first amendment rights!!

[Dr. Lynn Fynn-derella (ret) 🐭 @Fynnderella1]

A federal appeals court has reaffirmed New York’s strict school-vaccination requirements, dealing a setback to Amish families seeking religious exemptions. In Miller v. McDonald, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit ruled that the state’s elimination of religious exemptions does not violate the First Amendment-protected rights of Amish parents and private schools. The decision imposes significant fines for noncompliance.

[GINGERSKOL💜💛 @GlowSurfing]

HISTORY LESSON ON YOUR SOCIAL SECURITY CARD:
Just in case some of you young whippersnappers (& some older ones) didn’t know this. It’s easy to check out, if you don’t believe it. Be sure and show it to your family and friends. They need a little history lesson on what’s what and it doesn’t matter whether you are Democrat or Republican. Facts are FACTS.
Up until the 1980's, Social Security cards expressly stated the number and card were not to be used for identification purposes.
Since nearly everyone in the United States now has a number, it became convenient to use it anyway and the "NOT FOR IDENTIFICATION" message was removed.
Franklin Roosevelt, a Democrat, introduced the Social Security (FICA) Program. His promises are in black, with updates in brackets.
1.) That participation in the Program would be completely voluntary [No longer voluntary],
2.) That the participants would only have to pay 1% of the first $1,400 of their annual Incomes into the Program [Now 7.65% on the first $90,000, and 15% on the first $90,000 if you’re self-employed],
3.) That the money the participants elected to put into the Program would be deductible from their income for tax purposes each year [No longer tax deductible],
4.) That the money the participants put into the independent ‘Trust Fund’ rather than into the general operating fund, and therefore, would only be used to fund the Social Security Retirement Program, and no other Government program [Under Johnson the money was moved to the General Fund and spent], and
5.) That the annuity payments to the retirees would never be taxed as income [Under Clinton & Gore up to 85% of your Social Security can be taxed].
Since many of us have paid into FICA for years and are now receiving a Social Security check every month — and then finding that we are getting taxed on 85% of the money we paid to the Federal government to ‘put away’ — you may be interested in the following:
Q: Which Political Party took Social Security from the independent ‘Trust Fund’ and put it into the general fund so that Congress could spend it?
A: It was Lyndon Johnson and the democratically controlled House and Senate.
Q: Which Political Party eliminated the income tax deduction for Social Security (FICA) withholding?
A: The Democratic Party.
Q: Which Political Party started taxing Social Security annuities?
A: The Democratic Party, with Al Gore casting the ‘tie-breaking’ deciding vote as President of the Senate, while he was Vice President of the US
AND MY FAVORITE:
Q: Which Political Party decided to start giving annuity payments to immigrants?
A: That’s right! Jimmy Carter and the Democratic Party. Immigrants moved into this country, and at age 65, began to receive Social Security payments! The Democratic Party gave these payments to them, even though they never paid a dime into it!
Now, after violating the original contract (FICA), the Democrats turn around and tell you that the Republicans want to take your Social Security away!
And the worst part about it is uninformed citizens believe it! If enough people receive this, maybe a seed of awareness will be planted and maybe changes will evolve. Maybe not, though. Some Democrats are awfully sure of what isn’t so — but it’s worth a try.
How many people can YOU send this to?