@Goatedko Christianity exploded among non Jews despite heavy opposition from Jewish leaders dummy , hardly a "Jewish PSYOP." Paul went from persecutor to apostle after meeting the risen Christ, his writings fulfill Old Testament prophecy, not invent a plot.
@HardenBetter_ One God, 3 persons, not 3 gods to choose from. God the Son died on the cross, full stop. Attacking a strawman you built yourself isn't the win you think it is.
@fawzydawah The Quran borrows biblical people, stories, and claims all over the place. It doesn’t stand on its own; it’s arguing with the Bible while depending on it
@NotSonnyFaz "Never met a Muslim who hates Christians" is anecdote, not data Faz, Open Doors' 2026 World Watch List shows 380M+ Christians persecuted worldwide, with most top offenders (Somalia, Yemen, Pakistan, Nigeria, Afghanistan) being Muslim majority nations enforcing it by law.
@korrathetaymi So "every knee shall bow, including Jesus" is not what it says. It says every knee bows at the name of Jesus, confessing Him as Lord, which is the opposite of your claim. Get it right Korra.
@Ahraz__ That claim is backwards. A "global" miracle seen by the whole planet has zero corroboration from any astronomy obsessed civilization, no Chinese, Persian, or Byzantine record, while the resurrection has multiple early sources with direct eyewitness testimony, as in Acts 2: 32.
@MercifulMessage The crucifixion was not God losing, it was God winning through sacrifice, then vindicating it with the resurrection three days later. You are stuck on the setup and skipping the ending because it destroys your point
@fawzydawah You butchered Galatians 3 :13 so badly it is embarrassing. Christ bearing the curse for others is the whole point of the verse, so you did not expose Christianity, you just proved you do not understand substitution.
@fawzydawah That is the dumbest possible reading of John 6. Christians are not drinking literal blood at church, and calling it pagan just advertises that you cannot tell symbolism, sacrament, and cannibalism apart.
@muslimorthodoxy That is bad history and bad exegesis. A late hostile tradition is weaker than the earlier sources, and Galatians 5:2 is about relying on the Law for salvation, not about every instance of circumcision under any circumstance.
@el_Principino4@vult_dues Bro “Hadith isn’t scripture” does not save the argument. It is still a core Islamic authority but you know that already, and the age is still in the source Muslims use to define the Prophet’s words and actions.
@el_Principino4@vult_dues No, my argument is not “if it is not in the text, it is false.” My argument is that an age directly stated in a primary source is stronger evidence than an age inferred later from commentary, so Aisha and Rebekah are not parallel cases.
@el_Principino4@vult_dues Nice try, but “some scholars disagree” does not help you when the hadith still says it plainly. The real comparison would only work if the Bible directly said Rebekah was a certain age and then Christians tried to explain it away afterward.